Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Attacks Sites Participating in Its Own Campaign

An anonymous reader writes "The RIAA is once again at their old tricks. The band Nine Inch Nails has intentionally 'leaked' songs via USB keys hidden at restrooms during their current European tour. Sites hosting the songs are now being sent cease and desist orders. 'Ironically, with its numerous pirated downloads available, the whole album has not leaked yet. According to a source, the only leaks are the ones Reznor approved himself. And whether he realizes it or not, Reznor may be building a new option for presenting music that augments the existing CD/tour scenario.'"

6 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. "found" USB keys by foodnugget · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I frequently take things I've found in bathrooms and put them in corresponding ports.
    Seriously, USB key, or, really, anything else, who is taking things they find lying around (in bathrooms!) and putting them in their computers?
    This might just give script kiddies the idea of a brand new way to start spreading worms...

    I'm not sure if i'm trying to be serious or gross, here, but i do know i would not be putting a found USB key in any box of mine (esp. if it is running windows...)
    Similarly, what kind of format are these being left in? MP3? WMA? something with some nasty DRM?

  2. Reminds me a rabid dog by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    RIAA reminds more of a rabid dog: Biting at friend and foe alike. An unreasoning animal with no clear objective.

    I'm not sure what strategy they're pursuing, but it's not working. One wonders why member companies continue funding an organization that frequently acts against their membership's best interests and frequently paints them in a bad light. It's just astounding to me how poorly RIAA performs their task and how ineffective in achieving their objectives. And they don't seem to learn anything from past failures. It's like a corporate version of the Bush administration.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  3. Don't sell Rez short - he knows his marketing... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to a source, the only leaks are the ones Reznor approved himself. And whether he realizes it or not, Reznor may be building a new option for presenting music that augments the existing CD/tour scenario.


    Um...you really think Rez's leaking songs for something other than to augment his gravy train (CD/tour)? No, like most people trying to make a living in entertainment, he's picked up some marketing savvy along the way, and is using the same "try before you buy" technique that also works when selling software, illegal drugs and laundry detergent.

    The story about dropping USBs in the shitter is just a brilliant way to get even more free press: a band putting their B-sides on its web site is already quite common and won't get its story...
  4. Re:Huh? by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Current works are built of previous works as a matter of necessity. So calling music distributors thieves is not simply "hot headed". It's simply taking EVERYTHING into account. People build on the works of others and the expect exclusive ownership. Then they interfere with others trying to do the same thing they did (build on the work of others).

    That is as much theft as anything that consumer pirates do.

    Now the RIAA is trying to interfere with one of it's artists that has realized that pirates are a damn good distribution medium. This situation simply highlights the fact that artists have no real control over their work anymore. Those with the most valuable creative contribution are actually being exploited and abused by the very body that loudly proclaims to protect musicians.

    There is also fair use and the actual artists intent to consider.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  5. Re:I think you're the confused one by Marillion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From another article I read, Trent obtained permission to conduct this campain from his label. The label had full knowledge, hope and expectation that the few songs on the USB drive would be widely distributed.

    --
    This is a boring sig
  6. Re:I think you're the confused one by danimrich · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's discuss the following aspect: Assume that an USB stick was given to me by a stranger as a gift. Let's further assume that the USB stick contained an mp3, but no mention of the artist who created it, no copyright message, no license, and the stranger didn't say anything about it. Would I be allowed to publish the mp3 on the internet?

    Similarly, if NIN intentionally lose USB sticks with some songs from their unreleased album, how could the finder be expected to know or verify that the mp3 is actually a real NIN mp3 and copyrighted? Call Trent?
    At what stage does a song that is sung become a copyrighted song?

    --
    where's all that Karma?