SCO Vs. IBM Leaks Exposed

Xenographic writes "Remember all the fuss about SCO subpoenaing PJ of Groklaw, where they allege that she's funded by IBM because she once got a publicly available document from a volunteer at the courthouse a little before it hit the Court's website? That's nothing. Groklaw has evidence that other materials have been leaked in this case — but they weren't leaked to Groklaw, and they weren't leaked by IBM. Information about the sealed materials in question made its way to Maureen O'Gara, who wrote a story based on inside information, displaying a positively uncanny insight into what SCO was planning, including far more than just the sealed document a SCO lawyer read out loud in open court. Interestingly, several witnesses report that Maureen O'Gara did not even attend that hearing, leaving us to speculate about her source."

Comments

Re:Retarded Moderation

[WrongSizeGlass]

How is this a troll? Do moderators have no shame or sensibility? You must be new here.


warning: The above content tests positive for sarcasm and/or is a failed attempt at humor and should be taken with a pound of alt.

Re:Where this comes from

[SleepyHappyDoc]

It is true that taking the time to format and submit a link tends to garner mods, especially if vaguely relevant. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anything probably isn't relevant enough to cut it.

It's funny, though.

Interesting article

[coastin]

Oh SCO, how did you sink soo low....

When I was a child I use to hope the Circus would never end, but now I've grown tired of the clowns!

Re:Retarded Moderation

[Schlemphfer]

I enjoyed how you, in a nice way, suggested that most moderators are morons -- and then had your comment moderated up as informative.