Slashdot Mirror


Zero-60 in 3.1 Seconds, Batteries Included

FloatsomNJetsom writes "Popular Mechanics has a very cool video and report about test-driving Hybrid Technologies' L1X-75, a battery powered, 600-hp, carbon-fiber roadster that pulls zero-60 in about 3.1 seconds, and tops out at 175 mph. Of course, there are few creature comforts inside, but that's mainly because the car's 200 mile range is meant for the track, not the road. Nonetheless, Popular Mechanics takes the car for a spin up 10th Avenue in NYC. Oh, and the car recharges via a 110 outlet. They also test-drove Ford's HySeries Edge, a hydrogen fuel-cell powered, plug-in series hybrid that, unlike the L1X-75, is unfortunately at least 10 years away from production and nearly 100 mph slower."

7 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. The bike (singular) is even faster by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Killacycle used to be powered by spiral-wound AGM cells, but the producer went out of business.

    Since then, it was repowered with A123Systems' LiFePO4 cells. It now does 0-60 in 1.5 seconds and the quarter mile in 8.16.

    Electrics need not be slow, and their range is growing by leaps and bounds. The ICE has received its terminal diagnosis; the future is electric.

  2. How about the rest of the story? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Oh, and the car recharges via a 110 outlet.

    Yes, and in how many days to pass that much energy back into your car. Not exactly a candidate for a quick pit stop, unless they can swap the entire battery pack in 10 seconds.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  3. Re:quarter mile time? by Bertie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually I'd rather know how it does 30-70 in gear, as that's the kind of acceleration I actually need - getting up to speed for joining a motorway. Blasting away from the lights is strictly for boy racers, and how fast my car does it is of no practical value to me.

  4. MSRP? by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I can buy one of these for under $40K, call me. Until then, this is a neat idea which requires much more development before anyone will be interested.

    I'm all for green power, green transport, et. al. But if it costs me more than my house, what's the point? Nobody will buy it because nobody can afford it, good intentions or not.

    Now if all automakers would suddenly convert over to pure carbon-fiber bodies, CF production costs would (eventually) plummet to the point where it's the same cost (or cheaper) than steel. But that's not likely to happen anytime soon.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  5. Re:Make electric cars cool by rossifer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They never sound right so it will never be cool enough.
    I think silence and/or natural noises (wind noise) are pretty damned cool. But then, I prefer sailboats over motor boats, vibrating phones over polyphonic ring tones, opening the window over central heating/AC, backpacking over theme parks, reading over television...

    So, I'm a wierdo. But I did manage to find a wife who agrees with me on noise, so I'm not alone, just outnumbered.

    Less glibly: I would love to be able to eliminate my motorcycle tailpipe and make it completely silent. I've heard that this would make me less safe, but I've noticed that when driving, I've never heard a motorcycle coming up behind me. Even the ones with loud pipes.

    Regards,
    Ross
  6. Why is this red herring moderated up? by guidryp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He makes a clear point. Electric cars break the tie to any single fuel type. That means at any point the generation is cleaned up by adding renewables/nuclear even old electric on the road benefit.

    You concentrate on the worse case scenario without even looking into it. You can look up carbon content per megajoule of energy today and do the comparison numbers.

    You will still produce much less net emissions by using an electric car because of it's much higher efficiency.

    Under no circumstance is an electric car producing more net emissions. This long tailpipe argument is an old unsupported red herring.

  7. Re:Doesn't work, refer back to Newton, Faraday et by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One thing is certain: factor in the battery manufacture and recycling costs, and they are no solution to global warming.

    No, the whole idea is to have all the pollution happen elsewhere - like at the top of a very tall stack instead of at ground level in the centre of a city. It's the same with hybrids - they are the solution to a city traffic problem and have a different transmission system that has benefit.

    As for the SUV thing - yes you can cherry pick stuff and say that a one litre Suzuki Seirra is still an SUV but it all comes down to big heavy vehicles requiring more energy to move about whether they have a tonne of batteries or are just big to look impressive. A minivan with the aerodynamic properties of a brick can carry more people for far less energy than what I would normally call an SUV.