Slashdot Mirror


Google Admits to Using Sohu Database

prostoalex writes "A few days ago a Chinese company, Sohu.com, alleged Google improperly tapped its database for its Pinyin IME product, stirring controversy on whether two databases were similar just due to normal research process. Today Google admitted that its new product for Chinese market 'was built leveraging some non-Google database resources.' 'The dictionaries used with both software from Google and Sohu shared several common mistakes, where Chinese characters were matched with the wrong Pinyin equivalents. In addition, both dictionaries listed the names of engineers who had developed Sohu's Sogou Pinyin IME.'"

3 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. Do no evil by z-j-y · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is going to release a statement that stealing code/data is not evil in China, and Google must fit in local cultures and abide by local laws.

    Seriously, this is just pathetic. I am appalled by the Google apologists on slashdot.

    Chinese input is a well established market; Google Giant forces itself into the market with a product that is very similar to existing ones and offers no innovation. That is not evil enough? They did this by stealing data and who knows what from others. Mind you that the data is not publicly available, so Google must have committed certain crimes to obtain the data.

    For those who don't see what's the big deal: the mapping from ASCII sequence to Chinese character/phrase is not trivial; actually it is what Chinese input is all about.

    1. Re:Do no evil by ShawnDoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a serious problem when dealing with Chinese companies. Now that Google has opened offices in China and has staffed them with native Chinese people, they're going to have a hard time enforcing western style ideas about copyright and what constitutes "doing no evil". Its a problem we've run into in the past with our Chinese operations. The way the problem was "solved", by removing the engineers names, but still clearly using the other company's engine (they didn't remove the identical bugs), is something I have seen happen in the past when dealing with our R&D team in China when we've found them using code they "borrowed" either from open source code or from an engineers past employer. I've never seen it handled in public like this however. Google is going to need to take some serious Q&A steps in their Chinese offices to keep stuff like this from happening again or else risk their Chinese office ruining the entire company's reputation.

  2. Re:Time for a slogan change? by LarsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This reminds me of Animal Farm and how the commandments on the barn wall changed.

    The people outside looked from Google to MS, and from MS to Google, and from Google to MS again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

    --
    If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!