F-Secure Calls for '.safe' TLD
Rajesh writes "According to F-Secure, ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), the organization responsible for the global coordination of the Internet's system of unique identifiers, should introduce a .safe domain name to be used by registered banks and other financial organizations."
I just don't trust anything that comes out and says "trust me, I'm safe." This isn't a good idea, it teaches people to let their guard down as opposed to being aware of the risks of blanketly trusting a website. What if someone gets some exploit code on one of these sites? I think it'll just take a few notable hacked up website before the whole trust of .safe is lost.
People are infallible and immune from social engineering attacks and there is no way a shady organization would ever get a .safe domain.
My twitter
Count down to the first case where a .safe domain is corrupted because of nepotism, fraud, forgery, what-have-you.
.safe TLD mean, in that case?
A TLD does not solve this problem. An alert user does, aided by tools like regular check-ups, challenge-response systems or cryptography.
We've all heard how some corporations lose several thousands of records of personal data. What does that
Exactly, how many people would pay for an .unsafe tld?
.com.safe, .gov.safe, .net.safe....
.unsafe domain and we're done!
So once 95% of all websites decide that they want to be safe, how do organise the namespace? How about
Then all we do is turn off the
Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
Agreed. We should also create a .terror domain--it'd help make tracking down those evil evil terra-ists that much easier...
This guy's the limit!