The Myth of the Superhacker
mlimber writes "University of Colorado Law School professor Paul Ohm, a specialist in computer crime law, criminal procedure, intellectual property, and information privacy, writes about the excessive fretting over the Superhacker (or Superuser, as Ohm calls him), who steals identities, software, and media and sows chaos with viruses etc., and how the fear of these powerful users inordinately shapes laws and policy related to privacy and digital rights."
YUM delicious
ps liverpool owns
Mention of Law +1 point - damn lawyers
Mention of intellectual property +1 point - imaginary, mindless term
Mention of Superhacker +1.5 points - popular usage of "hacker", plus a super tackled on it, also overloading Superuser - let me scream bloody murder k?
Mention of software and media stealing +1 point - you don't steal software and media
Mention of "The gist is that we need to start to police our rhetoric" +1 point - after overloading and misusing a lot of terms it is just hypocritical.
Final score: 5.5 points out of the needed 4,
article 2>&1 >/dev/null
It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
Be yourself no matter what they say
Mod parent overrated. One anti-religious quip and he gets +X Insightful? Please.
Your punctuation, spelling, and grammar isn't much better. Hint, if you want to be a good writer then be a good reader. As for the girls, well, I just dunno.
C|N>K
Naw dude - you got pwnt.
Whatever, I spend the time to write a comment that has some personal background to try and make it a little more interesting and all I get is you anonymous tards who have nothing but smartass shit to troll around with. Fuck off, assholes.