Slashdot Mirror


Washington Bans Chemicals; Industry Freaks

Frosty Piss writes "The governor of Washington is scheduled to sign legislation today to ban flame retardants called PBDEs in furniture, televisions, and computers in the state. This is despite the more than $220,000 the chemical industry has spent since 2005 to defeat the legislation. At a time when the federal government is largely ineffectual in regulating long-used but potentially dangerous industrial chemicals, the Washington ban could be the beginning of the end for PBDEs across the nation. 'The industry that makes deca and PBDEs is freaking out because they lost so severely in Washington state and other states will follow,' said a spokeswoman for the Washington Toxics Coalition. 'It really is a message from Washington state and policymakers that we won't accept chemicals that build up in our bodies and our children.'"

33 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. But if the children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    burn to death, we're fine with that...

    1. Re:But if the children by noidentity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, as long as it's not too many. Otherwise we'd have to ban anything that's not metal/glass/ceramic.... oh, wait, those could cut someone, so we better ban them too. The question is not whether it's dangerous, it's how to balance the inherent tradeoffs between the various dangers.

  2. As opposed to burning to death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This might be the first recorded Think-Of-The-Children infinite loop:

    "If you get rid of the flame retardant, people will die in fires. Think of the children!"
    "No, YOU think of the children, who are filling up with toxic chemicals!"
    "YOU think of the children, who are currently on fire!"
    (and so forth)

    Meanwhile, the children grow up and move to Vancouver.

    1. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      "YOU think of the children, who are currently on fire!"
      (and so forth)

      Meanwhile, the children grow up and move to Vancouver.

      One would think that being on fire might retard the maturation process in children, never mind Canadian Immigration being ok with immigrants ablaze.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by sammy+baby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Canada, aka Canuckia, is getting a lot stricter with its immigration policies. These days I'm pretty sure that showing up at a checkpoint while on fire will get you detained for a fairly lengthy interview with Canuckian authorities.

    3. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by onkelonkel · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a Canadian I can assure you that our ever-vigilant Customs and Immigration officers would ask several sternly worded questions before they admitted such a person.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    4. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      At which point they would be sued for discrimination against flamers...(interpret as you will)

    5. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And after providing proof that they were in fact being unfairly discriminated against because they were ablaze, the Canadian court would overrule the intervention of Customs and Immigration. Not only that but the PM would soundly condemn the practice of discrimination based on current fire affinity but they would pass a rule allowing admittance based on asylum for those who are currently ablaze. After which the major airports would be flooded with arriving foreigners who would promptly purchase a bottle of flammable substance and promptly douse themselves in it and upon being called for their interview with customs would promptly alight themselves.

    6. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

      One would think that being on fire might retard the maturation process in children, never mind Canadian Immigration being ok with immigrants ablaze. We've never had a problem with flamers. Gay marriage has been legal here for years.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    7. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by tbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a Canadian I can assure you that our ever-vigilant Customs and Immigration officers would ask several sternly worded questions before they admitted such a person.

      How dare they discriminate against the Incendiary-American community!

    8. Re:As opposed to burning to death? by dryeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meanwhile, the children grow up and move to Vancouver. Well it does rain enough in Vancouver that the children are unlikely to burn
      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  3. Washington Toxics Coalition by Expertus · · Score: 3, Funny

    'The industry that makes deca and PBDEs is freaking out because they lost so severely in Washington state and other states will follow,' said a spokeswoman for the Washington Toxics Coalition. They might have stood a better chance with a different name
    1. Re:Washington Toxics Coalition by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not as bad as the Washington Biological Survey, abbreviated as "Wash. Biol. Surv.", which people may mistake as animal cooking instructions.

  4. Money talks? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is despite the more than $220,000 the chemical industry has spent since 2005 to defeat the legislation.

    Wow a whole $200k over two years; they must really be serious!

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Money talks? by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Funny

      No kidding. You can't even buy ONE congresscritter for that these days, unless they are cheap or desparate.

    2. Re:Money talks? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      that much money bought them 3 lobbysts and a magic marker, but they had to SHARE the magic marker.
          In other news the Washington state legislature passed a bill that outlawed the most common casue of fire: Oxygen. The bill mandates that industry provide an alternative to this dangerous gas within the next 4 years. In a move seen by many as a landmark case Washington may well become the first Oxygen free state in the nation.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Money talks? by Pope · · Score: 4, Funny

      1 US dollar = 1.6 metric dollars.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  5. Re:So ... ? by pla · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... does this mean that work on Vista will have to be moved out of state?

    Nah, it goes down in flames at the drop of a hat.

  6. Re:So ... ? by beckerist · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'd be surprised at the current effectiveness of Vista's Firewall. Talk about retardant!

  7. Re:Another step towards a States Rights battle? by mi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would not be surprised either — promises to "cut the red tape" and reduce the regulatory burden is part of the reason I vote Republican...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  8. Re:Inflamatory rhetoric by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget dihydrogen monoxide!

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  9. Almost recursive by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Funny

    The post calling for a -1 Flamebait mod being moded -1 Flamebait tickles my weird sense of humor. What's next, a post asking for a +1 Insightful mod getting moded +1 Insightful?

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  10. Re:Abuse of states' rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But I have to wonder, at the same time, at what point legislation stops being about good-for-the-people, or even look-I'm-doing-something-vote-for me, and starts being about legislating morals, ethics, and such.

    It's got so bad in my state that they actually outlawed murder, not just because it's expensive but because it's "wrong".
  11. Wait...they're banning industry freaks? by wramsdel · · Score: 3, Funny

    So does that mean that Steve Ballmer has to move?

  12. Re:And in other news... by pla · · Score: 3, Funny

    In short, you're an ignorant douchelord

    I bow before your superior eloquence.

  13. Washington Bans Chemicals; Industry Freaks by phazux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good thing...

    I've been wanting those industry freaks banned for a while.

    --
    -- Working to secure tomorrows technology. Honestly Officer!
  14. Re:The fear born of ignorance is at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I didn't know granola and Birkenstocks were fire retardants.

  15. Re:I've gotten worried about this myself by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget about dihydrogen monoxide! It's been found in over 50% of all cancers examined! Inhaling excessive amounts has been known to cause death! This substance should be banned world wide!

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  16. There is actually a law to prevent this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can't just show up at the border waving a firearm.

  17. Re:It only takes a spark by Yaotzin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Interpretation: Congressmen need more than 6 figures to be bought off. $220,000.05 Yes... Now that should do it!
    --
    Error: No error occurred
  18. Simpler idea by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not just ban matches?

  19. safer form of asbestos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed. They should use chemicals that cause more painless forms of cancer.

  20. Re:The fear born of ignorance is at work by furchin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now there's a brilliant idea! Posting my personal contact information on slashdot. Should I leave you my pager number too, to make sure I don't get any sleep for the next two weeks?