Slashdot Mirror


Why are Websites Still Forcing People to Use IE?

DragonTHC asks: "I just visited Movielink's website for research. Their site has a nice message saying, 'Sorry, but in order to enjoy the Movielink service you must use Internet Explorer 5.0 (or higher) or Mozilla/Firefox with an IE Tab Extension (IE installation required).' While allowing the IETab Firefox extension is somewhat progressive, why do companies still force people to use Internet Explorer? Surely the site should work just fine in Firefox? With Firefox's steady gains in market share, you would think that webmasters would get the hint. If you are a webmaster, what are your reasons for forcing IE?"

22 of 899 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Obvious by alexjohnc3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the same reason people use IE in the first place: They are stupid and/or lazy.

    They could also have a passionate love for Microsoft. Oh wait, I guess that falls under the "stupid" category, doesn't it?

  2. Slashdot Webmasters Forcing IE? by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you are a webmaster, what are your reasons for forcing IE?

    Do you honestly believe there exists a /. webmaster who would require IE?

    And if such a monster exists, do you honestly believe he'd admit it?

    1. Re:Slashdot Webmasters Forcing IE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes.

      -Anonymous Coward

      *ducks*

  3. As I was told by chuckymonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    by a tech support person, "because Linux and free software are hacker tools".

    --
    "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  4. Re:What could be worse? by robogun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't sweat it, Google kicks the shit out of them by not indexing Flash pages.

  5. Just to balance things out... by Ant+P. · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...I use an XHTML mime-type on all my pages.

  6. Re:Obvious arrogance. by gregmac · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know! Firefox doesn't even run ActiveX controls, and those awesome search bars that give you free stuff don't even install into it!

    --
    Speak before you think
  7. Re:Obvious by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1, Funny

    How narrow-minded. Do you know why I use IE? I used Firefox 1.0, and unless they've improved it since then, it rendered some sites (Gamespot is one that comes to mind as being particularly bad) very slowly, and very inaccurately. So, since I haven't heard of Firefox's rendering improving (of course, everyone raved about how good it was at the time, so maybe my experiences were unique), I use IE 7. The only feature in Firefox that I cared about was tabs, and now IE has that. So, am I stupid or lazy, given those reasons?

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  8. stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, you do read Gamespot...

  9. Re:Banks by quag7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bank of America works...Of course, they're the official bank of the antichrist, so there's that.

  10. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't call anything running Windows Vista a "Workstation" with a straight face.

  11. Re:We only support IE because... by xjimhb · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The boss wants to cut costs and doesn't see the choice driving away clients."

    And then you say "Nobody here is dumb ..."???? Come ON!

  12. Re:Obvious arrogance. by AmiAthena · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was curious about the error message, so I tried to go to movielink, which caused Firefox to crash. Fun fun fun!

  13. The Internet... by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... uses the blue e thingy. So, you don't use the internet?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  14. Re:eTRADE requires IE to access account by bejito81 · · Score: 1, Funny

    it is always so funny to see people speaking about security issues in internet explorer, do you really think you ll have less security issues on firefox? so many people try to find security issues on IE, so naturaly they find some, but so many stupid people think firefox is so great that they dont look for security issues on firefox. somehow it is very comparable to people saying that linux is so great, they never got viruses or so. it is just that hackers/pirates prefer find security issues in microsoft product to hit more people, but trust me you can find many issues on linux too. if microsoft product were that bad, do you really think so many people would still be using them?

  15. Re:Obvious by romland · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nonsense. I've had work done on a number of ASP websites and never got a dinner by Microsoft!

  16. Re:Try This.... by StarWreck · · Score: 2, Funny

    hehe, typo. It'll make Firefox tell the website that it is IE even though its still using the FireFox rendering engine.

    --
    ... and in the DRM, bind them.
  17. Re:We only support IE because... by egandalf · · Score: 2, Funny

    My boss uses a Mac and he'd rather it looked worse in IE than in Firefox. I'm still trying to convince him to let me put a big "Get a Better Browser Link" on our homepage for IE users.

    I have a dream.

    --
    Those who have telepathy have no need to RTFA.
  18. Re:Obvious by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can run Windows Vista on a "Playstation"?!?!?

  19. Re:Obvious by Observador · · Score: 3, Funny

    At the bus station the bus stops; at the train station the train stops...

    Guess what happens at the Vista work station.

    --
    I wish I could filter out the annoying Pickens articles...
  20. why by whatev · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why pose the question "Why are Websites Still Forcing People to Use IE?"? The header for this article should have read, "Come here if you want to gripe about Microsoft", or "Join us in Microsoft bash session". Give it a rest already.

  21. Re:Obvious by slonkak · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have mod points, but there is no "-1 dumbass" mod.