MySpace Takes on Google News and Digg
cyberianpan writes "According to a Times Online article, MySpace is going into the news business. They'll soon be premiering a service that will scour the internet for news stories and let users vote on which ones receive the most exposure. This approach blends elements of Google News and sites such as Digg and Netscape, which rely on readers to submit stories and determine their prominence. One could see where this might be the 'holy grail' of internet news. Not only will you be able to tap into the wisdom of the crowds, but ultimately your recommended stories could be influenced by the likes and dislikes of your friends/heroes."
And "ultimately your recommended stories could be influenced by the likes and dislikes of your friends/heroes"?
All in the same paragraph as "MySpace"?
Hold the phone... where do I sign up?
After all, it worked marvelously for Digg!
And instead of taking contributions everyone - which works out famously on Digg, by the way - or instead of using intelligent algorithms to uniformly aggregate news from a wide variety of news outlets around the world, this instead filters down to the existing membership and intellectual level of MySpace?
What could go wrong?
...
More like "the collective whim of whatever quasi-viral story du jour interests MySpace users at the moment".
Yeah, I realize News Corp owns MySpace. But give me a break.
Again, and again, and again...., American Idol a thousand weeks running. who cares?
Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
Myspace will bring some much needed credibility to the mainstream media.
I submitted this same story earlier this morning but it was voted down to black in the firehose almost instantly. Probably because of the negative spin I gave it. Well, I'm not afraid of losing karma so I'll spout my ramblings in a post instead.
...
Rupert Murdoch owns News Corporation, a conglomerate business that, among other things, owns many news sources. MySpace is a division of News Corp as well as Fox News, The Sun, The Australian, SmartSource, The Times, New York Post, News of the World, etc.
Something interesting about Rupert Murdoch is his political leanings are often reflected in all of the divisions of his corporation. Guess why 175 of his editors favored the Iraq war.
Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever you need to call me in order to ignore one nagging issue--is it really that safe to have so many different news sources coming from really the same man? The worst part is that there is no perceived relation between the New York Post and Fox News yet they are basically one and the same in how they spin their news on partisan issues. It's the same in Great Britain & Australia. I don't even care that he's predominantly conservative in his views, I just care that if he decided to back any candidate (possibly even Hillary Clinton) that suddenly that candidate is favored in many news sources. He's making political decisions that impact the world and he's not an elected politician.
I fear that if MySpace is edited at all by hand or by automation, it will favor articles that favor his candidates--in exactly the same way he has been running his newspapers and TV news. Beware your free and capitalist media, America because it looks as though a single man has a growing monopoly on it
My work here is dung.
I thought the basic demographic of heavy MySpace users were the same group that never talk about the news unless its sponsored by a cosmetics company or MTV?
Support NYCountryLawyer RIAA vs People
The day I want some 13 year old emo kid brigade to guide me with their "wisdom" will be a cold day in hell.
Tapping into the collective wisdom of the MySpace crowd might not be the most productive thing in the world...
Why do I feel like I'm about to enter into a tug of war for the essence of my soul?
Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
"OMG I HAVE A MYSPACE ON TEH INTARWEB!"
Do you really trust this person to help provide useful news?
Yeah, but how often will the news be this instead?
Sorry! an unexpected error has occurred.
This error has been forwarded to MySpace's technical group.
Wisdom of the crowds? When you get a crowd, wisdom is the opposite of what you have. To paraphrase an entertaining little movie, only because I'm too lazy go to look it up properly, a person is smart. People are dumb, panicky animals and you know it.
Here on slashdot, supposedly the site for "news for nerds", the only way we reach anything like wisdom (or even correct information) is for a bunch of people to spout off foolishly and then be corrected incorrectly by people who think they're smart, who are finally properly corrected by someone who knows what they're talking about - usually by which time the story has left the front page.
My first guess is that a myspace news will be far, far worse.
I do think that community-developed media is the future of basically all types of media. But the above quote just makes me snicker.
Do I really want the same news feed as my idol? I mean, since I'm a nerd, if I actually had an idol it would probably be someone whose news page would be interesting. But if I were a typical myspacecase, I'd be reading about basketball shoes and ferraris or something.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Dungg.com
I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
Britney Spears...
/., only different topics. /.:
Jessica Simpson...
American Idol...
OMG Ponies!
Oddly enough, it's similar to
Most frequent stories on
Linux is ready for the Desktop!
Ground-breaking new hard-drive capacity!
New, ground-breaking graphics cards!
OMFG Ponies!
What worries me is the power one man is given without an election. Point me to a conglomerate of "liberal spouting news organizations" run by one man or even one company all spinning the news the same way and I'll be just as critical and upset.
Please do reply to this with an example of 175 editors all working under the same man all coming to the same conclusion about a partisan issue and I'll add them to my list.
Fine, you sit back and take it. I'll bitch about it on Slashdot because I love my free speech.
If you had read that Wikipedia link, you'd notice he has hosted fund raisers for Hillary Clinton. I don't give a rat's ass who the candidate is, if I like them or if I like their party. I just have a problem with him exerting influence through a news dominant stance.
In my eyes, MySpace is just another growth of that iron grasp but apparently you don't agree or care with me about that
My work here is dung.
So not only is user-driven news sources inherently flawed, but as we all know, giving any sort of voice or power to Myspace users just screams OMG PONIES, "OMG NEW SHOES AT ABERCOMBIE" and "People- DO U ACTLY THINK IM HOT?" all over the front page, daily.
I, for one, welcome our new Myspace over.... OMG PONIEZ!!!!!!
There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
:wq
"What could possibly go wrong?" Well, how about "Triumph of the Will", only with NASCAR. Or for the less serious maybe some of the mass hysteria scenes from "Spongebob Squarepants."
I'll take my content filtered by The Man, please.
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
Finally! I have been waiting for a place to find all the information I ever wanted on free iPhones, ring tones, Target gift cards and penis enlargement supplements.
hey! geuss wat? i just got my FREE voucher for that handbag i was telling u about! You can get 1 to, just click this link. Be quick before they all run out!
Shouldn't they worry about fixing the functionality they already (are supposed to) have instead of trying to add new functionality?
Make me a friend and I'll mod you up