Teens Actually Do Protect Their Online Profiles
Thib writes "A study from the Pew Internet and American Life Project reveals that the majority of teens pay attention to what they are revealing about themselves in their online social profiles. For instance, while many routinely use their first name or include a picture, 'fewer than a third of teens with profiles use their last names, and a similar number include their e-mail addresses. Only 2 percent list their cell phone numbers.' The study comes to light just as state legislatures once again begin to mutter about the dangers of online predators. From the article: 'According to Pew, 45 percent of online teens do not have profiles at all, a figure that contradicts widespread perceptions that the nation's youths are continually on MySpace.'"
That's still a huge number of people who have exposed themselves to risk.
Why is it that politicians are always addressing the symptoms of societies problems?
How long till they want to simply ban the internet?
What is it that causes people to prey on children in the first place? I think there should be more investigation into that.
Personally, I think this is fantastic news. People expose themselves on the Internet far too often and quite often volunteer information which they really should not.
--
Geoff Robertson
3304 Celeste Ave.
Dupage, IL 39182
(630) 555-1221
Maybe we can finally that prove Yes, finally you can that prove you have brains! us teens can actually think for themselves Indeed, why don't people realize that you can they do that?
Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
I agree. Protect against Spam and Scam's first. Children at least have parents who should have taught them properly, the elderly don't have this...
Me failed English...
FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
Last names aren't exactly the most revealing piece of info evar. Besides which, there is more than one case here: Someone could post their first & last names on a social networking site, such as Facebook, with a "friends-only" profile setting (the default) so that only people they authorize can see it (as I do), or they could just put it out there. There's a big difference, and I would have to wonder if the study took that into account. Also, people might have varying levels of personal info available on different sites (eg. have more info on a Facebook page than a /. or digg page, for the above reason).