Slashdot Mirror
Open WAP = Probable Cause?
RockoTDF writes "A court in texas has ruled that an open WAP is not a sufficient defense against child pornography charges, a ruling which could carry over to p2p users. In addition, it appears that an open WAP could be seen as probable cause by law enforcement."
How did this not get modded flamebait? This post has absolutely nothing to do with open WAPs and is an intentionally inflamatory comment, posted no doubt with the hopes that others will respond with similarly inflamatory comments about our rights to own guns.
Mods, please review your guidelines. (Specifically the part about not modding comments simply becuase you may or may not agree with the poster's sentiments.)
If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.
Ahahah
You know its so true.... I look at the EU and think gee... isn't that what our "Federal Government" was supposed to be? A strong alliance between independant states for mutual defense and betterment.
Sadly, nobody bothered to look at how that worked out for us.
The strong alliance has come to dominate the states. Its power has creeped ever so steadly, and now an entity that was once meant to govern interstate commerce and defend the boarders now interferes in peoples lives. The supreme court even ruled recently that it can meddle in your medical relationship with your doctor.
Yes... thats exactly what interstate commerce and boarder defense was about. Good thing we struck down that 9th amendment eh?
-Steve
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"