Microsoft, Best Buy Face Racketeering Suit

15 judges of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals have unanimously reversed dismissal of a RICO class action suit against Microsoft and Best Buy, which claims the companies engaged in fraud in promoting Microsoft's MSN online service. (RICO is a statute originally intended to help prosecutors go after organized crime.) Quoting: "The case started after James Odom bought a PC-based laptop at a Contra Costa County Best Buy store. Data about the purchase was sent to Microsoft as part of a joint marketing agreement between the companies. Microsoft then signed Mr. Odom up for its MSN Internet service and, after a free trial period, began billing him for it." Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog has more details on the reversal, including a paraphrase from one of the appellate judges that "all blame rests with the U.S. Supreme Court for allowing the 'outlandish' result that a claim such as this can be pursued under RICO."

Comments

Re:This is definitely true, Revelations inside

[Anonymous Coward]

The last time I forced customers to setup with this was a memorable occasion. A semi-intelligent customer realizes I had just set him up with something that he did not want. I confused him by rushing him through the process

So... How's it feel to be a Corporate Whore ?

Re:RICO is a Bad Law

[jellie]

RICO may be an overly broad law. But I remember when it was used by the Clinton DOJ to sue the tobacco industry, asking for a disgorgement of "ill gotten" gains. I remember reading, at the time, that quite a few legal scholars found it to be a brilliant tactic because it allowed the government to essentially try and bankrupt the tobacco industry.

But alas, Bush became president. I believe they watered down the monetary penalties so much that it became a joke. And we all know how incapable the DOJ is now.