Slashdot Mirror


CNET Reporters Intend to Sue HP Over Surveillance

theodp writes "The NY Times reports that three CNET journalists whose records, as well as those of their relatives, were scrutinized by pretexting investigators working for HP intend to sue the company for invasion of privacy. HP, who paid $14.5M to settle a lawsuit filed by the CA attorney general in connection with the spying, reportedly offered each reporter $10,000, roughly enough to cover legal bills. The CNET reporters have been banned from covering HP or its see-no-evil CEO, who BTW was rewarded with $20.33M in 2006 despite skipping his reading assignments."

1 of 40 comments (clear)

  1. Re:HP's Actions Where Shameful by arun_s · · Score: 4, Informative
    From TFA:

    A California judge dismissed the charges against Ms. Dunn in March and reduced the charges against three other defendants to misdemeanors.
    The company agreed in December to pay $14.5 million to settle a civil lawsuit filed by the California attorney general in connection with the spying. The company has also apologized to the journalists.
    Yeah, they really got punished the last time round. They actually had to apologise to all those journalists!
    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.