Slashdot Mirror
Jobs to Labels- Lose the DRM & We'll Talk Price
eldavojohn writes "Apple CEO Steve Jobs has been talking smack about DRM and has recently issued a verbal offer to major music lables stating that if they are willing to lose the DRM, he'd be willing to raise his 99 cent price for those iTunes songs. These tracks (such as the recent EMI deal) would also have better sound quality & cost about 30 cents more."
But we like suing people who prefer high quality audio ... we would prefer if all online music was 24kbs and required a new DRM key for each play session.
.. well we might already be there, but there are still 10-year-olds to sue.
We of the RIAA will resist this thing called "progress" until our lawsuits make us hated more than rush hour traffic. *cough*
Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
1. Find scoop
2. Misspell major word in description submitted to slashdot
3. ?????
4. PRFOIT !!?
The labels have already loosed the DRM.
We want them to lose the DRM.
If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
How did you manage to get this right in the headline and STILL get it wrong in the summary?
Geez!
"Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
Absolutely. This being Slashdot and you being on the wrong side of an opinion, that the 85% of music distributed via CD constitutes an 'outmoded distribution system', means that unless you fully and in great detail explain not only every possible nuance and misinterpretation of your argument but that you also post your full life history as it relates to the topic, and your DD214 if you have one.
Notice that no one has commented on the actual substance of your post yet.
So let this be a lesson. Do not go against the grain.
Microsoft doesn't have a "Monopoly" in any sense of the word. They have a complete vertical market solution, which is not the same as monopoly. You are free to choose other market options that are reasonably close facsimile of what Microsoft produces, but you'll be giving up the virtually seamless integration by doing so.
Microsoft's Internet Explorer, MS Offfice and Windows handle many INDUSTRY standards, and ONE proprietary data format (*.doc).
I never got the gripe of you Anti-Microsoft whiners. Go, use Apple, or Linux, or whatever else is out there for operating your computer, nobody is holding a gun to your head. Go, Use Firefox, Open Office and any other source for editing documents and surfing the web. Hopefully you don't have to be a technical genius to get it all to work right, because if you do, then you're obviously missing the point of Windows, IE, Office and the whole integration thing. It Just Works (TM).
I gave my wife Windows last year for her birthday, she didn't even know what it was! The she picked up and used it, and started Surfing the web and editing documents right away. It just works for her, and it is "easy" for her. Which is the whole point, isn't it?
We got it hooked into the Media Center in the kitchen, the Main Whole House Stereo system, because "It Just Works(TM)".
If you want to call that a Monopoly, fine, go ahead. I call it building a better mousetrap, and Microsoft has done a great job in making an Operating System Experience that is pleasant. Sorry if it doesn't support Ogg or Linux or whatever else you think it ought to. It does support MP3 and ACC, both open formats, and can rip, burn CDs quickly and easily, and support from many third party add-ons, and IE and Office works both on Mac and Windows.
So, I don't know what the beef is all about. It isn't the monopoly you think it is.
> I have bought a total of about 3 cds in my entire life, but i've also purchased 5-6 songs from the itunes store.
You own three cds and 6 mp3s from iTunes and you bought an iPod? Let me guess, you also bought two books once and then built a library to keep them in.