Slashdot Mirror


Spy Chief Hints At Limits On Satellite Photos

An anonymous reader writes "Vice Adm. Robert Murrett, director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, says that the increasing availability of commercial satellite photos may require the government to restrict distribution. 'I could certainly foresee circumstances in which we would not want imagery to be openly disseminated of a sensitive site of any type, whether it is here or overseas,' he said. This would include imagery on Web sites such as Google Earth, because the companies that supply the photos get help from the NGIA with launches." I had never heard of this particular intelligence agency. During the early months of the invasion of Afghanistan they bought up all satellite imagery over that country, worldwide, in a tactic later dubbed "checkbook shutter control."

19 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I claim this first post for pi! by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Funny

    just so you know, you've got a typo in there

  2. Re:NGA not NGIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think he actually means NIGA - the intelligence agency from the ghetto.

  3. Re:Restriction on restriction by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...non-US commercial sources...
    Terraists.

    ...images will still be available from European and Japanese satellites...
    Either they are for US or against US.

    ...learn to live with the fact...
    You must be new here. This regime does not "live with facts".
    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  4. Re:panic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    While i understand the logic here to an extent, it is a bit of a knee jerk reaction. If somebody really needed ariel photos of a place for illicit purposes it would be MUCH easier for them to obtain them from a balloon, or even an airplane.


    Have you ever tried this near military locations? And what kind of sentence did you get?

  5. Re:NGA not NGIA by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 5, Funny

    nga plz.

  6. Re:Suspicious Cloud by slayermet420 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ummmm, you said it's a "suspicious cloud" over a "chemical plant"? You ever stop to think that it could be "smoke"? That's what it looks like to me.

    --
    Geeks strike again 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  7. Re:Restriction on restriction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't forget CTU and "Division"!

  8. Re:Intelligence Agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Look out, they'll be after you because you haxxored them! Obscurity is security, and you didn't respect their securitah!

  9. Re:on control of information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1998's not old

    Get back in your wheelchair you fossil! That's almost a whole friggin decade ago!

  10. Re:A Message from the Ministry of Truth by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Funny

    remind anyone of anything *cough cough* DRM *cough cough* copy protection *cough*

    Do you need some Sucrets? Maybe you should have called-in sick to Slashdot today.

  11. Re:You americans are living in intelligence hell by Anomolous+Cowturd · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know you're headed for disaster when your only consolation is being better than the English.

    --
    Software patents delenda est.
  12. Re:Restriction on restriction by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The current admin does everything, seriously, everything
    wrong, which creates long term damage.

    You can predict what their response will be to any
    situation: whatever will create damage will be the choice.

    The list is long. Katrina is a good example."

    If the current adminstration was able to cause Katrina, then perhaps that tinfoil hat isn't going to be enough.....

    --
    -Styopa
  13. It's an allergy. by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Funny
    Do you need some Sucrets?



    He's just allergic to BS.

  14. Re:How to stop companies selling pictures of home by Ed_1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even better: Paint 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 on the roof of your house. Build a large structure/plant trees/mow grass/make crop circle with the same information...

  15. Re:panic? by gtall · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, your right. We regularly move our building around about every six months just to confuse the terrorists.

  16. Re:Can you receive and decode this stuff yourself? by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nothing to it - all you need is a 12m tracking dish capable of keeping up with a Low Earth Orbit Satellite on a circa. 90 minute orbit, hardware capable of handling the huge bandwidth required (a single QuickBird scene of about 272 km^2 runs to gigabytes, then you can hack into the satellite to persuade it to unload the raw data from the on-board solid-state memory to your PC which knows how to process it into system-corrected data and then...

    I have one of those at work, but they won't let me play with it.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  17. Re:Restriction on restriction by Apoklypse · · Score: 0, Funny

    and "in fact", (US government) nature abhors a factuum

  18. Re:Restriction on restriction by drgonzo59 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah...wait someone is at my doo.DD:KSDFKFDSD HFKSDHFK adfkasdf

  19. Re:Restriction on restriction by pipatron · · Score: 2, Funny

    If doing this saves the lives of US soldiers

    There's a much easier and obvious way to save the lives of US soldiers, but unfortunately I only want to provide that information on a need-to-know basis.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */