Slashdot Mirror


Vista's Troublesome UAC is Developer's Fault?

MythMoth wonders: "We've heard all about the pain and discomfort of working with Windows' User Account Control (UAC) switched on, but now Ian Griffiths is explaining that the developers are the problem — they brought it on themselves. In earlier articles we have heard that Microsoft think that everyone should do it like this — Ian does acknowledge that things are better in the Unix world, but is he right? Is the onus now on the developers to help fix a problem that they did not cause?" Rather than ask the user for permission on every operation, what other ways could Microsoft have improved Vista's security?

2 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Admin-level privileges by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, a software company approves another software company's software.

    Nope. Can't see it happening.

    --
    A sig is placed here
    To display how futile
    English Haiku is
  2. Re:I saw a different problem by B'Trey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, it IS a new item on the stack...

    (Please do note that I'm not defending this decision, just pointing out what the thought process likely was...)

    --

    "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.