Slashdot Mirror


US's Slow Embrace of Information Technology

mattnyc99 writes "To motivate his new column, Popular Mechanics' Glenn Derene takes research data from a discussion here of his last column. He analyzes a new study released this week — revealing that fully 49 percent of Americans 'only occasionally use modern gadgetry' — to compare the rise of the PC with that of the TV and ask a big question: What keeps the most important and powerful communication tool since the telephone from being universally embraced?"

11 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Incredible! by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comparing a product that takes an IQ of 12 to understand and use to a product that honestly take above average IQ to use and wondering why the Computer and Internet is not beign adopted as fast as the item everyone calls the "idiot box"?

    Tv is passive, I can sit there and drool at it watching the guy getting kicked in the crotch show all day long. The computer takes not only knowledge and mental ability, but the worst part it takes EFFORT to use.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Because were are not all the same. by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look, outside of work, if I really wanted to, I could live without my computer. Hell I can live without a cell phone too. It just takes discipline. I lived through the 70s and 80s without the access I have these days as did my parents and their parents before them.

    Rural America has more pressing issues than the net, let alone the people with manual labor type jobs. Don't classify them as ignorant either. Many of them do a far better job at raising their families than the so called "educated elite". They don't need the net as a subsitute for life and friends. They don't need TV shows for entertainment, let alone care to see the violence in big cities portrayed in fiction and fact.

    Its America stupid, we are not one giant homogenized horde. We are little tight knit groups spread out across a large area all enjoying the freedom this country affords, and that freedom can and does mean not doing what everyone thinks you should be doing. Hell there are times I wish I could live back on the farm, work 12 to 14 hour days, and never see a computer. Somethings the simpler life is actually better.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Because were are not all the same. by Doc+Lazarus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But then again, the crux of your argument is that life would be simpler, but not that enlightening. While I did grow up in a fairly rural town, I wouldn't care to do it again. Having a close knit group of people you can rely upon is good, but it's not everything. It leads to a stagnation of thought and personal growth as you become homogenized to your group. And a lot of the time, most people see that as a negative instead of a positive. Yes, you're in a group, but you're alone in that group.

      This shows that one of the biggest problems that America faces is being too insular. Variety is indeed the spice of life, and simply living with people that you adapt your values to in exchange for feeling a sense of belonging is a false one. Plus, it could be seen that a rejection of something that takes skill in exchange for being purposely ignorant is not a virtue, but a sign of fear.

  3. People don't read so well by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The internet requires lots of reading. Broadband and Youtube cut down on it a little, but there's still lots and lots of reading. People don't like to read.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  4. list of reasons by egburr · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What keeps the most important and powerful communication tool since the telephone from being universally embraced?

    • Price - hundreds to thousands of dollars for a computer versus tens of dollars for a phone
    • Ease of use - I can make and complete a phone call in less time than my computer takes to boot
    • Ease of maintainability - virus checking, defragmentation, spyware, trojans, etc. Need I say more?
    • Expected lifespan - Growing up, we had the same phone for 15 years. Even the cheap phones last 5 usually. How long is it until a computer is obsolete? Two years? Unusable in four?
    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  5. Well... by sheldon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My father was an engineer at Zenith, back in 60's and 70's... We had one of the first color televisions in the neighborhood. It also just happened to be a engineering prototype. But don't worry! My father had the schematics!

    So in my family, we had what we called the yearly "Fix the Television" event. This would be somewhat akin to reinstalling the OS in your computer. It involved taking the back off the television and with a combination of compressed air and a vacuum, removing most of the dust. Sometimes it involved replacing weak solder joints. But it always involved replacing worn out vacuum tubes.

    Each vacuum tube, of which there were perhaps 20 total, was removed one at a time and carefully wrapped in kleenex and placed in a box. This box then was taken down to Radio Shack where each tube was placed into the tube tester to verify it's performance characteristics.

    After buying the new tubes to replace the old ones, back home we came to reassemble the television.

    People today lament about how there is no longer a need for television repair men. Instead people keep their televisions for 10-15 years and when they die they throw them away. Some day people will be complaining about how you don't need a help desk, and desktop support teams.

    That day can't come soon enough for me.

  6. TV Too Easy? We can fix that... by bockelboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I appreciate the fact that most posters and the article writer seem to blame the difference on the fact that TVs are so much easier to use than computers.

    Those people obviously aren't looking far enough into the future.

    I see a world with a mess of cords behind each and every TV; one where HDMI gets half-adapted as the "one true solution" for each component, before 3 new incompatible versions of the cord come out.

    I see a world of MS Media Center. A world where it takes a day or two to set up your TV. A world which requires firmware updates to DVRs, firmware updates to DVD players, firmware updates to BluRay / HD-DVD players, HDCP updates to TVs -- without which none of the above components will work. Dare I even say that the first non-computer electronics virus will come within the next 2 years?

    I see a world of TV remotes with full-sized keyboards so you can buy Pay-Per-View movies directly from the internet, and view them the next day when they download. I see a world where the bootup time for your setup is measured in minutes, not seconds.

    Perhaps, some day in the future, after work we will go home to watch some TV to relax. Then we will all go outside in order to relax from watching TV.

  7. Re:Why, you ask? by mangu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    if you do go out into the field to get the most popular apps, you're looking at many times the purchase price of the computer for a set of the full versions, and they usually lower the overall system responsiveness


    And the answer to this problem is ... Linux!


    Computers are still the automobile of the 1920s, or the private aircraft of today. They work, but it's hardly something the average person can really understand and use without a significant investment in both time and money.


    An interesting parallel, take a look at this description of the user interface in the most popular car in the 1920s:

    There are three pedals on the floor, two levers on the steering column, and one floor lever to the left of the driver. The floor lever is neutral while in the upright position, second gear when in the forward position while the leftmost pedal is not depressed, and emergency brake when all the way back.
      The leftmost pedal is first gear while depressed, second gear if the floor lever is forward when released. The middle pedal is reverse gear and the rightmost pedal is the brake. The right lever on the steering column is the gas, and the other lever is the spark advance. Confused? Once you drive for a month or so, it gets easy, but the controls are far from orthogonal. If you get into trouble, you can just stomp on all three pedals and that will stop you pretty quick. Doing this causes the bands in the transmission to lock up the drive train.


    About half of the cars in the road in the 1920s were Ford Model T. The fact that the user interface shifted to the usual today, with the accelerator on the right, tells a lot how users can accept innovations.


    We can still hope that Windows will go the way of the Model T and people will adopt less cumbersome computer systems in the future. The difference between the Windows user interface and Gnome or Kde is much less than the difference between a Model T and a 1920s Chevrolet.

  8. Re:Blame the phone companies by operagost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know who coined that term "neo-libertarian" (I'm guessing you) but we already have a word for someone who wants to entwine corporations with government: "fascist." Don't make up some grabage term just because you don't like libertarians. Libertarians are opposed to most forms of government control of corporations, positive and negative.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  9. Remember the internet appliance? by qweqwe321 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The simple solution is to provide an slightly more functional version of the internet appliance that Just Works (tm). Something like a Wii with a keyboard and AbiWord would be perfect-- an interface that is idiot-proof, comes out secure by default, uses a remote for navigation, and all you have to do is plug it into your TV and its Ethernet port. Most people already have a television set and free RCA jacks-- there's no need to buy a whole separate set of peripherals to watch YouTube and type emails to Aunt Mary.

  10. On Windows by AP31R0N · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's cute seeing all the windows bashing here. However, 90% of the computers of the world are running windows, so windows CAN'T be the problem. Windows has done more to make computer use prevalent than anything else. People like to complain about windows being bloated and unstable. But to say that they have to ignore that Windows has to work with hundreds of hardware vendors and thousands of software vendors. Linux and Mac have far fewer compatibility issues, not because they are superior in design, but because there are so few things to install into them or connect to them. If a company wanted to make video games for Linux, how much could they possibly make? Making hardware for Macs is almost as futile. You can sell to 9 users or to 1. There are some situations where a monopoly can be good for the consumer. Mass production lowers price. More potential customers = more enticement to produce things. i am not a windows fanboy, i am however a fanboy of being objective. Windows has its flaws, but most of those flaws are overcome by allow the user a huge array of software and hardware. Linux, while i love the idea of it, is still not ready for prime time. Anyway, back to the subject.

    We also have segments of the population that have no reason at all to have a computer. Just because we /.ers are so entwined with our machines, doesn't mean that everyone else wants to be or should be. Anyone over the age of 60 has only a few uses for a computer. The main use being keeping in touch with their grandkids who won't call them anymore. As people age their brains learn more slowly, new things require learning. We tried to get grandma to use email and she was terrified of the machine. Then there are people who live in the sticks. Dial up is painful to use, and getting worse since web developers are largely incompetent and are making sites more complex and larger. Our culture revere athletes above teachers and scientists and artist (not to be confused with performers). It shouldn't be a surprise. i think that the next generation of kids will see to it that everyone has a computer and broadband.

    We also have a populous that hates to pay taxes. We hate being told what to do or how things should be done. In cultures like Japan, the leaders can say, "Right, we're going to IP6", and it's done. If that means raising taxes or making citizens/companies change their ways, so be it. We however comma are all cowboys alone on the range. i'm not saying either is right or wrong, just describing what i see. There are good and bad things each model. Our future might depend on adoption of technology. We face obsolescence if we don't adapt.

    i think we are slow to adopt IT because the US has a strong anti-intellectual streak. We hate anyone smarter/more educated than us. Computers are for smart people, smart people think they are soooo superior to us. Again, the next generation might not think that way. My lil brother, ten years younger than i, had a PC in the house since he was 7. i had one in the home since i was (does the math) 17. Now kids are coming back from the hospital never knowing a life without a computer in the home.

    Build a console that does email and chat, like WebTV. Build machines that can do only ONE thing at a time. Want to do word processing? Slap in the Word cartridge. Let's play WoW, slap in the WoW cartridge. That's what most Americans want from a computer. Anything more complex than that should be for geeks only. Whoever builds this machine will be a brazillianaire.

    What is luxury today, is necessity tomorrow

    - Faith and the Muse

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!