Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

NASA Unveils Hubble's Successor

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the new-and-improved dept.

dalutong writes "BBC News has an article detailing NASA's replacement for the much-loved Hubble telescope. The $4.5 billion telescope will be placed in orbit 1.5 million km from Earth and will be almost three times the size of the Hubble. It is set to launch in 2013. They also plan to service the Hubble in 2008."

8 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. So if this one breaks ... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... who's going to fix it????

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:So if this one breaks ... by pookemon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pffft! As if that would happen... NASA learns from it's mistakes. :)

      They're far more likely to do something new - like tell it to go to the other side of the sun, via the centre of the sun.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    2. Re:So if this one breaks ... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Funny
      They're far more likely to do something new - like tell it to go to the other side of the sun, via the centre of the sun.

      That's ok, they can get it to land at night.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  2. Completely Offtopic!!!!! by rts008 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long is that lame /. poll going to stay????

    Move on to the next subject!!!!

    I have Karma to burn....mod's do not hold any fear for me!!!!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  3. is it just me by callmetheraven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me or does the JWST look kind of like Barbie's Imperial Star Destroyer?

    --
    You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  4. Re:Six years? by HAKdragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think it's possible, it's not like their working on Duke Nukem Forever or anything.

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
  5. Re:We dont need hubble for visible... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hot damn, you bitch slapped the parent post.

  6. Re:We dont need hubble for visible... by beset · · Score: 4, Funny

    You actually know what you're talking about.

    You must be new here.

    --
    1) Clever Sig 2) ????? 3) Profit!