Deep Blue vs. Kasparov 10th Anniversary

qeorqe writes "For the tenth anniversary of Deep Blue's victory over the world chess champion Garry Kasparov, Wired has an interview with Deep Blue developer Murray Cambell. The discuss the power of the now-aging supercomputer (equivalent to just one Cell processor), and the nonexistent future of PC vs. Human chess contests. 'It's almost the end of the story for chess in the sense that matches between chess machines and grand masters are becoming less interesting because it's so difficult for the human grand masters to compete successfully. They're even taking relatively dramatic steps like giving handicaps to computers, making them play the game with a pawn less or playing the game with less time. We're past the stage where there's a debate about who's better -- machines or grand masters -- and we're just looking for interesting ways to make the competition fairer.'"

Comments

the problem is chess

[St. Arbirix]

and we're just looking for interesting ways to make the competition fairer.

Make them play go.

Re:It was inevitable

[j0nb0y]

Humans are really bad at being random, so a computer could stomp a human at Rock/Paper/Scissors, provided that there were enough rounds.