Slashdot Mirror


Wolfram Offers Prize For (2,3) Turing Machine

An anonymous reader writes "Stephen Wolfram, creator of Mathematica and author of A New Kind of Science, is offering a prize of $25K to anyone who can prove or disprove his conjecture that a particular 2-state, 3-color Turing machine is universal. If true, it would be the simplest universal TM, and possibly the simplest universal computational system. The announcement comes on the 5-year anniversary of the publication of NKS, where among other things Wolfram introduced the current reigning TM champion — 'rule 110,' with 2 states and 5 colors."

18 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. 33% solved. by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the colors must be blue so it can emulate Windows.

  2. Sounds like... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...he's given up on proving it himself.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  3. I can disprove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It'll take me some time.

    I can disprove it. It will take me some time.

    I can disprove it. It'll take me some time.

    I can disprove it. It will take me some time.

  4. Cock & Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it just me... or is this graph not family-appropriate?

    1. Re:Cock & Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sad thing is, I posted anonymously 'cause I figured the mods would think that was a troll. And now, I'm posting anonymously because this is off topic. Just my luck, this will get modded up as "funny" again, just for the irony.

  5. Cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was disappointed that Wolfram's book A New Kind of Science wasn't something like a Scientology cult. He would have been the awesomest cult leader!

  6. Re:They have it all wrong. by Frozen+Void · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its way less interesting then rule 34.

  7. I have a proof by vivaoporto · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a truly marvellous proof of this proposition which this comment is too narrow to contain.

  8. Re:No Halting State by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, and wtf kind of notation is that? I suppose I could go to the library and dig up a copy of NKS, but $25,000 isn't worth the trouble.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  9. Hmm by Frogbert · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't understand a word of the summary.. or the article.. But I'm going away to research the topic extensively, and when I get back you can all be assured I'll have opinions on it... Loud opinions!

  10. Re:No Halting State by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's not forget:

    being that I was both a computer programmer and a mathematician, I was in a unique position....

    I remember 5 years ago walking around my comp sci lab proclaiming to people:

    being that I am both a computer programmer and a master of Bubble Bobble, I am in a unique position....
    being that I am both a computer programmer and holding a piece of chalk right now, I am in a unique position....

    The implication being that I am going to lock myself in a cave for the next 10 years any minute now and come out to self publish a book about the lint I found in my navel.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  11. Re:They have it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Way, way, way less interesting. But more importantly, the first rule of /b/: DON'T EFFING TALK ABOUT /B/.

  12. batshit insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ".. a rare blend of monster raving egomania and utter
    batshit insanity"

    Cosma Rohilla Shalizi on S.Wolfram, A new kind of science

    http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/notebooks/cellula r-automata.html

  13. Microsoft's proofs by should_be_linear · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Research Labs has 221 proofs to choose from. 85 proofs are related to Mathematics, 115 proofs are related to Alan Turing himself and 21 are mostly general proofs on anything. Also, thay have 43 proofs on those little cells that combine togather into tapestry patterns.

    --
    839*929
  14. where's my $25K? by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ok, my proof is by contradiction: First, I take a sheet of graph paper and put a mark on it. Here's a transcript of the experiment.

    Me: Hello Mr (2,3), how are you?

    Graph paper: no response.

    Me: Hello. Mr (2,3)? Are you there?

    Graph paper: no response.

    Me: Mr (2,3), can you hear me?

    Graph paper: no response.

    Me: HELLO! CAN-YOU-HEAR-ME? MIS-TER (2,3)? CAN-YOU-HEAR-ME?

    Graph paper: no response.

    Me: ARE-YOU-THERE? MIS-TER (2,3)? PLEASE RESPOND?

    Graph paper: no response.

    Me: MIS-TER (2,3), PLEASE RESPOND NOW! IF-YOU-DO-NOT, I-SHALL-BE-FORCED-TO-CONCLUDE-THAT-YOU-ARE-NOT-HUM AN! N-O-T H-U-M-A-N!

    Graph paper: no response.

    Obviously, based on this Turing test, the (2,3) machine is not intelligent, but all intelligent creatures can simulate universal Turing machines. Contradiction! Q.E.D.

  15. Re:Cult of NKS by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

    So you are telling me lord Xenu used Mathematica to create all those space planes and send them into volcanoes?

  16. Re:They have it all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You fucking retard, he didn't mention ... He simply mentioned Rule 34. On top of that you can't even spell ... properly. There is no uppercase in ... It is always lower case. You are obviously some pathetic gaiafag that seriously needs to become an hero. I suggest you lurk the fuck moar before trying to act all hard on the interbutts. You don't even know your fucking memes correctly.

    I hate fag-bitch retards like you that spoil the good name of ... especially as it is YOU that has broken Rule 1 and Rule 2.

    Now STFU retard, go die in a fire and may our Lord Raptor Jesus H Christ show mercy on your unworthy soul.

  17. Re:Arrow of time is reversed in CA by julesh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yep. California is one fucked-up place.