Slashdot Mirror


40M Vista Licenses in 100 Days

Gary writes "In the first 100 days since its launch in Jan 30 Windows Vista has sold an astounding 40 million licenses. Bill Gates gives the credit to accelerating consumer shift to digital lifestyles which has made it the fastest selling operating system in history. Surprisingly the more expensive premium editions accounted for 78 percent of Vista sales. With around 400,000 licenses a day new Vista users will take 8 weeks to beat Mac users, 4 days to exceed Mac sales and 3 days to exceed Linux desktop users."

29 of 579 comments (clear)

  1. Where did they get these numbers? by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm betting they included "free upgrade to vista" offers for copies of XP sold for the year prior to vista. But how many of these people have actually claimed their free upgrade copy?

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:Where did they get these numbers? by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know a couple that have. However most of them have subsequently given up on Vista and reinstalled XP.

    2. Re:Where did they get these numbers? by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I know a couple that have. However most of them have subsequently given up on Vista and reinstalled XP.

      Most of a couple?
      Anyhow, I love Gates' insinuation of "if you aren't using Vista, you're trapped in some pre-digital lifestyle limbo."

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Where did they get these numbers? by Skrynesaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AS there were 238 Million PCs sold last year, we could take a rough calculation of 20M PCs sold per month, thus in the first ~= 4 months Vista shipped -20M copies, including pre-existing vouchers !!

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    4. Re:Where did they get these numbers? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ok, so let's assume the split is something like 39,995,000 OEM sales and 5,000 retail. So what?


      The world's largest OEM, Dell, has begun selling PCs with Windows XP again and will soon offer PCs with Ubuntu pre-loaded. These separate, but related incidents come on the heals of complaints from Dell customers who wanted a choice after they had tried Windows Vista and discovered it sucks.

      40 million licenses != 40 million Vista users.
    5. Re:Where did they get these numbers? by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That hardly matters from Microsoft's perspective. They've booked the revenue. They get the income. That's the goal, remember. Tearing the numbers apart in throes of pedantic ecstasy is just masturbation.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    6. Re:Where did they get these numbers? by value_added · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope. They cannot state those as current-period sales, and for Gates to publically announce that they were would be grounds for FTC action. I'm sure he cleared the statement through Legal, so I'd be willing to bet those aren't included.

      I strongly doubt whether Gates needs to check with the folks in Legal when the folks in Accounting will do just fine.

      And since neither you nor I works in that area, we'll have to defer to someone more qualified or at least informed to comment as to how the sales were booked and the rationale used. In the interim, lets enjoy the wild speculation, trusting in the notion that there's a grain of truth to all rumours.

  2. Still doesn't say by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who these licenses are being sold to. If half of them were sold to only two OEMs, its not saying much really. If even half of them were bought off the shelf at Best Buy or other stores, that would say something. So, exactly who is buying these licenses?

    1. Re:Still doesn't say by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The catch is the fact that the more expensive premium editions are accounting for 78 percent of their sales. The people who don't want Vista aren't buying the premium editions.

  3. Waiting for it... by M-Saunders · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate Microsoft as much as the next man, but I'll be entertained to see how some Slashdotters twist this into being "bad for Microsoft" or something. Every other day I see some comment like "The end is here for Microsoft" or "It's all over for MS" or some such nonsense. Let's see:

    1) Record profits in the last year
    2) Fastest-selling OS in history

    It's only getting better for them, isn't it? We need another way to fight them...

    1. Re:Waiting for it... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Record-setting profits are easy when the profit margin is 80%+, and selling quickly is easy when each new PC sold has a copy of your product bundled with it.

      That removes things like production costs and consumer choice from the equation. :-)

      We already fought them in court, and won. It's hard to gain much ground, however, when some elements of the government seems to be in bed with the company which is violating anti-trust laws...

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  4. Fastest? by Applekid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Fastest-selling OS in history"

    That wouldn't have anything to do with having more computers in the world NOW versus, you know, any other point in history?

    In other news, the world's human population is the highest it's ever been in history.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  5. Both. by RingDev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a mixture of both. This is a press release by marketing to try to bolster stock prices. So when they mean licenses sold, that doesn't mean the same thing as copies purchased. It with all likelihood refers to the number of licenses they have sold to Dell and other major PC vendors, all of the free upgrade licenses from XP, all of the copies they sold to retailers (which the retailer may or may not be having luck selling), etc...

    Vista isn't the failure that /. anti-MS pundits would have you believe, but it is a long way from the success that Microsoft's marketing department would have you believe.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  6. Re:I'm confused... by Shados · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I should go and take some screenshots of articles and posts saying how Vista is a failure. The same darn thing happened with XP: "OMG! no drivers! Games don't work! its so slow! doesn't work on my 266 mhz celeron!", and now the Slashdot crowd spits out quite a bit that Microsoft is a failure -except- for XP, which is semi-acceptable.

    Now we see with Vista? Same damn thing. "OMG no drivers, omg games, omg its slow, omg omg omg failure, I'll never upgrade from the previous version!"

    Same. Damn. Thing. Hell, XP was worse: my 1 year old (at the time) lap-top had a hard time with XP, and I had paid a fortune for it. My 3 years old budget lap-top runs Vista just fine.

    The only thing that can rival Microsoft's FUD, is the fud coming from thousands of geeks banded together :)

  7. Re:I'm confused... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What am I supposed to believe: facts, or Slashdot FUD?

    The facts. And the facts are the Microsoft has been deferring the count of "Vista Upgrade Certificates" until the first quarter of 2007. So a large portion of the 40 million is from Vista licenses that Microsoft has been selling for the last year.

    It's also important to note that there are no figures on how many of those upgrade certificates have been cashed in for an actual copy of Vista. Which means that the number of installed Vista Desktops could be a mere fraction of the 40 million unit number that Microsoft is providing.

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." --Mark Twain
  8. Its difficult to buy a PC without it! by supersnail · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For all practical purposes you must buy a Wondows OS when you by a PC.
    (Geeks can manage it but try getting a cool VIAO or ACER which isnt preloaded with Vista!)

    The interesting statistics would be how may PCs sold with Vista have been back-graded to XP?

    Judging by the various blogs etc. this would seem to be the only way to get your shiny
    new box to run as fast as the old one.
    Google "Vista The long goodbye" Results 1 - 10 of about 907,000

    So thats 5% of Vista users hacked off about just one of the Vista bugs enough to blog or cry for help.

    --
    Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
  9. Give it until next year by Bullfish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The true tale of Vista will be in about 18 months (from release). I know for myself, I wouldn't touch Vista until the early adopters suffer the bugs inherent in any new MS release and MS fixes them, Ditto for all the missing drivers for hardware. After this time next year Vista will have ripened and be ready for prime time and we'll get an idea of what it can really do that makes a it worthwhile upgrade over XP. If it doesn't have any advantages by then, penetration will be largely limited to newly bought PC's and MS will have to do a rethink. If it does improve and become useful, then MS will continue on as it always has, and while some may not like that, remember that no one changes a successful behaviour. For them, it has been successful, like it or not.

  10. Re:I'm confused... by Professr3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't take issue with the system's speed or games. I have a problem with the protected content path, and other DRM technologies integrated even further into the operating system than any part of WMP11 was integrated into XP. If I'm going to buy or use an operating system, I expect it to be made with me (the consumer) in mind, not the interests big businesses have to limit my access and restrict my fair use rights. I recently switched to a Macbook Pro because of Vista, and I must say, I'm finding that it increases my productivity quite drastically.

  11. Re:Hmm.. by Idbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't RTFA (since appear to be /.'d), but I just wonder, how many of these licenses were sold to Dell, Toshiba, HP, etc...
    And since there are no more XP, well...

  12. Be interesting to find out... by Kythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...just how many copies of AOL are in circulation. Surely, the fact that it's included with just about every new PC proves AOL is a stellar success.

    --

    Kythe
  13. Typical Microsoft stretch marketing by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Trying to make a failed product launch look like a success.

    Fortunately, there are articles that take a more rational view of how many copies of Vista are actually being sold.

    The headline is simple, 40 million copies sold. Wow, we rox0rz! This is twice as fast as the XP adoption rate. What he didn't mention is that sales of PCs have more than doubled since XP came out. Silly Vole, no statistical cookie. The problem? Well, PCs sell at about 60 million units a quarter, and everyone we talk to expects sales of around 240-245 million units in 2007. Vista went on sale at the end of November for corporate customers, and one would expect a fair chunk of sales there from pent-up demand.

  14. Re:I'm confused... by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no such thing as slashdot group think. There are a wide variety of opinions expressed on this site, that's why I keep coming back. I think that the only reason anyone believes that stupid "group think" meme is because they believe that only someone brainwashed by group think could ever possibly disagree with them.

    Get over it. People who disagree with you are not weak willed idiots infected by some "group think" mental virus.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  15. Indeed by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you read the TFA carefully, you notice that they speak about "Vista license sold".
    Not "Vista License currently used to run the OS" or "machine currently running Vista in the wild".

    Almost any of my non-Linux-using friends that I know to have recently changed their computer, got it with Vista pre-installed by default and had to either go through the "can I swap it for a Windows XP if I send you the media ?" procedure with the machine manufacturer or dig out one of their one "Win XP Pirate edition".

    They are counted as "sold License". They don't run Vista any more.
    So my interpretation of the data is :

    40 * 10^6: Number of time Microsoft *sold Vista* (pre-installed on some machine at a time when the manufacturer didn't propose alternate OS)
    4 : Number of users currently running Vista (and still waiting for their legal WinXP install media that they claimed from the manufacturer to come in their mailboxes).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  16. What about our own dogfood? by GovCheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Few MS products look good out of the gate. Then they do what we do: they listen to their users and improve their product incrementally. Same thing FOSS devs do - but we don't like to admit that because MS are evil and their products don't live up to our standards. However, they make a shit pile doing it. A company with 20 something billion in reserves and no debt is not going to go down anytime soon folks and its foolish to underestimate a juggernaut with their resources. I'm not a fanboi and I could care less how well they are doing and its silly on our part to fixate on how poorly we would like to believe they are doing. It makes us look foolish. Let's fixate on improving our own dogfood instead of listening to our own make believe FUD. Let's not stoop to their level.

    --
    "He's using a quantum encryption scheme! That'll take hours to break!"
  17. Re:In other other news... by wilsonthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a myth, lemmings don't really jump off cliffs

  18. Less Vista licenses than PCs sold. by geoff+lane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone elsewhere pointed out that since Vista was released there have been approximately 50 million PCs sold. So, selling 40 million Vista licenses isn't that great.

  19. Re:XO by DShard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If naive doesn't apply to children I doubt it applies to anyone. Kids _become_ the most computer savvy people after spending time with them. The idea they will be more knowledgeable than computer scientists is so laughable as to be endearing. On the other hand, it is one of the better trolls.

  20. ALL of them--the story summary is a troll by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't reveal consumer and retail sales of Windows licenses, only license sales to OEMs. They did the same for Windows XP. Microsoft doesn't want people to know that retail sales are down 60% from Windows XP and that Vista demand is so low, Dell has reinstated XP as an option on its machines.

    As for "beating" Mac numbers, Britney Spears also sells more CDs in a year than Mozart concerts do. If that's the kind of victory that Microsoft fanboys want to trumpet, go ahead. Meanwhile, Vista is a flop.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  21. Re:Hmm.. by the_womble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Linux fanbase has no qualms claiming downloading=using
    Really? The only Linux number I have seen recently were for Ubuntu, and that was based on the number of people downloading updates through the automated system.

    those who use Linux a large number have it installed on secondary partitions as they want to keep their primary windows platform while playing around with Linux to get geek cred
    No. The dual booters I have met use Linux as their primary OS and use Windows for games.

    it never was, never was meant to be and never will be a mass market operating system used by the naive users
    I know several naive users who prefer it to Windows.