Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Going the Big and Bloated IE Way?

abhinav_pc writes "Wired is carrying an article pondering whether Firefox has become big and bloated, much like IE. As the browser's popularity has risen, the interest in cramming more features into the product has as well. Slowdowns and feature creep have some users asking for a return to the days of the 'slim and sexy' Firefox. 'Firefox's page-cache mechanism, for example, introduced in version 1.5, stores the last eight visited pages in the computer's memory. Caching pages in memory allows faster back browsing, but it can also leave a lot less memory for other applications to use. Less available RAM equals a less-responsive computer. Firefox addresses this issue somewhat, setting the default cache lower on computers with less than a gigabyte of RAM. Though the jury is still out on where the perfect balance between too many and too few features lies, one truth is apparent: The new web is pushing our browsers to the limit.'"

17 of 653 comments (clear)

  1. well no wonder by kauttapiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why I never get the first post!

  2. Oh! Oh! I know! by El_Isma · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's make a new and smaller browser, based on the same rendering engine! We'll call it Phoenix or something like that. You know, like it's brand new! It comes from the ashes, it must be good! And we won't bloat it, no, no. We'll make it speedy!

    Where did I hear that before?

  3. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least when you install Firefox, you don't get some version of Windows along with it :-)

    I mean, talk about bloat!

  4. Re:Besides the cache by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So other than the memory cache, what features could be stripped from FF to make it leaner and faster? I know nothing of its internals, but without any extensions it doesn't seem to have many wasteful features.

    A quick glance at the Firefox features page lists these things, which as far as I'm concerned are bloat as they are not fundamental to a web browser:

    • Spell Checking
    • Search Suggestions
    • Session Restore
    • Web Feeds (RSS)
    • Live Titles
    • Integrated Search
    • Live Bookmarks
    • Pop-up Blocker
    • Accessibility
    • Phishing Protection
    • Automated Update

    I don't see any reason why all of those things are integrated and not seperate addons. And that list gets bigger with each new version.

  5. Re:Firefox 2.x crashes all the time by ookabooka · · Score: 4, Funny

    My attempt to get modded up (any positive mod) by only quoting grandparent, parent, and the summary(and in that order). . . here goes:

    Most annoying thing are the crashes of Firefox 2.x! I don't care if it eats a lot of memory (I've got 2GB - who wouldn't these days?) or is bloated, but I can't stand the crashes!

    I'm running 3/4 of a gig, and I've never had Firefox crash. And I have BOINC running all the time. My CPU is spinning pretty high all the time, and I tend to have a good bit of my RAM being used all the time. So I don't know what you're doing wrong dude.

    Firefox addresses this issue somewhat, setting the default cache lower on computers with less than a gigabyte of RAM.

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
  6. Re:is it time by soleblaze · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's time to bring back VRML!

  7. If firefox becomes bloated by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Funny

    If firefox becomes bloated I will eat the internet with a fork.

    Get it? 'Fork'? *wink*

    I wouldn't worry to much.

    Oh and give epiphany a try.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  8. Re:Firefox=Mozilla? by The_Quinn · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's the beauty of open-source! If you want to maintain the current, lighter version of the browser, all you have to do is fork the source, manage an maintain security patch merges, compile from source, avoid legal entanglements by making the source available to requesters, and try to avoid fracturing the user/developer-community!

    Simple!

    :D

  9. Re:rethink the OS by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    The OS could send a "SIG_FREE_UP_SOME_DAMN_MEMORY". The best part would be applications that don't handle it would just crash, freeing up lots of memory :) But yeah, your point is valid; An OS managed shared cache could make cache management easier. An easier to add although not quite as elegant solution would be to have that cache be part of the desktop suite; While not fully shared, at least all the desktop apps for one user would be cooperating.

  10. Re:well by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Funny
    HALF???

    Speak for yourself, dude....

  11. A masterpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    The Concerto for Whiner in Five Movements, RMS235:

    • Movement I: There is no such problem, it's all FUD - Allegro assai
    • Movement II: Look over there, it's "M$ Windoze" - Grave larghetto
    • Movement IV: The community is "fixing" it - Lentissimo non tropo
    • Movement V: Free software is undeniably superior to everything - Andantino grazioso
    • Movement VI: This doesn't work, but try this other broken thing instead - Moderatto con brio
    Bravo maestro!
  12. Re:Opera! by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can watch whats going in and out of my ethernet and wireless card, but even so opera could be using some undocumented "feature" of a closed-source operating system to make sure I don't see it.

    That's possibly the most insane statement I've ever read by someone who claims to be savvy enough to fork a development project on his own. If you really think it's possible for an OS to pass information over a network in such a manner as to make it undetectable, then I have a very special invisible firewall to sell you. Don't worry, it's open source.. I only charge for the distribution costs.

  13. Alpha Bravo... by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, thats just perfect.

    GRANDMA, LISTEN ITS ABOUT:CONFIG

    ABOUT WHO NOW?

    CONFIG!!!

    KENNY FIG??? Alpha Bravo Oscar Uniform Tango colon Charlie Oscar November Foxtrot India Golf
  14. Real men.... by DanielG42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course this is irrelevant, because real men use lynx.

    --
    Daniel
  15. Re:Firefox is written in J#, IE is written in D by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, they're currently addressing that problem by rewriting Gecko in PHP (the UI will, however, continue being written in their flavor of eXtended ML). It will run on Mozilla's webservers and you will be able to run Firefox via any compatible web browser.

    Apple, OTOH, will rewrite Safari, KHTML, Konqueror and most of KDE in Objective Ruby, which will run on their iNternet iServers, accessible via iTCP/iP (compatible with Mac OS 10.9 and up). Right after they switch their kernel to Hurd.


    Yes, that's exactly how the future is going to be or my name is not Sir Reginold Frankbarrister O'Fritzebolt-Tooley the Thirteenth!

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  16. Re:Firefox 2.x crashes all the time by bunratty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exactly. 640K ought to be enough for anybody.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  17. Re:The flip site of strict error handling by Almahtar · · Score: 3, Funny

    But can you imagine a web built solely by programmers?

    Yeah, it probably would have consisted entirely of porn.