Slashdot Mirror


ISP Closes Webmail After Spammers Get Addresses

An anonymous reader writes "Error prone British ISP PlusNet, who you might remember for accidentally deleting 700GB of customer's e-mail last year, have done it again with a major security gaffe. Their webmail service was compromised this week, and spammers got hold of customers' e-mail addresses who they've been happily spamming away ever since. They've since made the decision to close their webmail service, in the ultimate admission of incompetence for the now BT owned ISP. In an e-mail to their customers, Network director Phil Webb goes on to recommend that their customers install security software, along with telling them that they shouldn't call up to complain. One might suggest that they need to practice what they preach."

142 comments

  1. Erm ? by mewt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh well who needs email anyway ?

    1. Re:Erm ? by owlnation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Old people. In Korea.

    2. Re:Erm ? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Websites with braindamaged signup processes still do.

    3. Re:Erm ? by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      In an e-mail to their customers
      And how were they supposed to read it?
      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    4. Re:Erm ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POP3?

    5. Re:Erm ? by zygwin · · Score: 1

      My ISP provides 25 MB of email space! .I have never bothered to login ever.

    6. Re:Erm ? by digitig · · Score: 1

      It's only webmail that's suspended. POP3 still works fine. FWIW, on what was a spam free address I'm now getting something like 2 or 3 spam per day (although that may go up as the list of addresses gets sold on). On my main address, which receives about 100 spam a day (I have good filters...) I can't see the difference.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    7. Re:Erm ? by Aliriza · · Score: 1

      The users should run away after last years disaster :) , it was a warning.

    8. Re:Erm ? by katsklaw · · Score: 1

      they deleted WEBMAIL, not the email accounts.

  2. Not surprising by Zelos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not all that surprising, this is a company whose account password policy is 5-8 characters, all lower case, no non-alphanumeric characters. I've been with plus.net for ages, they seemed fantastic after my truly awful experiences with Demon, but they've been much worse recently - they broke routing recently so that I couldn't connect to my work VPN for days. Anybody recommend any other decent UK ISPs? I hear good things about Pipex.

    1. Re:Not surprising by russasaurusRex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Recommend another ISP? Sure. I've used Freedom2Surf for just over 4 years now and haven't had a problem with them once.

    2. Re:Not surprising by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      Zen or Claranet

      Both have decent news feeds too.

    3. Re:Not surprising by Kryis · · Score: 1

      When I have a say in the matter, I tend to use Zen. They may be slightly more expensive than most, but on the few occasions that I have had to contact support, they have been very helpful. I will be switching my family to Zen from Freeserve/Wanadoo/Orange/Whatever they call themselves now.

    4. Re:Not surprising by maxume · · Score: 1

      Just how many invalid login attempts do you think they allow? I'm sure that foolish customers getting separated from their passwords by malware or stupidity is a much larger concern for them than brute force attacks.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Not surprising by DavidWeight · · Score: 0

      I've had good experiances with Bulldog - average to poor customer service, but no noticable downtime in a year, and unlimited service (downloading approx. 45Gb per month) with no complaints

    6. Re:Not surprising by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Since I left Metronet (after they got bought by PlusNet!), I've been with both IDNet and NewNet both of which are brilliant. Neither is expensive, and both provide problem free broadband without any port blocking or "traffic shaping". I would strongly recommend either!

    7. Re:Not surprising by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember when Demon used to be good? I'm talking about 15 years ago now at the dawn of the internet, one of their selling points was their usenet news server (the newsborg!), when they were a small company and close to their customers. They've never been the same since they were bought up by Thus.

      I keep my Demon account open purely because I have used the TAM account for a long, long time and a large number of people know that as my contact email. Recently they wrote to me to say I hadn't paid for 3 years, even tho my bank statement says otherwise. Why would they would still be providing a service for me after that long if I hadn't been paying?

      Almost an hour on a phone with someone who I could barely understand and couldn't understand my accent, kept insisting I give my credit card details and didn't know how to handle my request, a supervisor that wasn't very helpful and then a 10 minute hold where presumably they transfered me back to an office in the UK from some offshore phone center I finally got it sorted. Having not had to deal with them direct for several years I was gravely disappointed on how far they have fallen.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    8. Re:Not surprising by matt_wilts · · Score: 1

      I'm off to Zen, I requested my MAC (code needed for an ADSL transfer) last night. They're stalling at the moment, trying to get me to move to a new product, but after seeing their service gradually go down the toilet without a corresponding drop in my rental, I decided enough was enough.

      It's a shame, because a few years back when I joined them they were an excellent "techie" ISP...but then the binary newsgroups were dropped, next the traffic shaping started (so they could reserve bandwidth for their VoIP service), then the 700Mb loss of email last year, and finally this latest hack.

      Call me picky, but....

    9. Re:Not surprising by cruachan · · Score: 1

      I've been using Zetnet since 1995 (www.zetnet.com). They used to be Shetland based, but moved to Manchester in a buy out a few years back. They are very much a small independent ISP undoubtably reselling feeds from another company and with that you get the positives and negatives. On the positive side their techies - of which they only have a few - are available by IRC as well as phone and email and they're more than happy to go the extra mile with you. If you like being on first name terms with your support staff, and knowing you can email the guys directly fixing the problems instread of going through a call centre in Bangalore then they are ideal. On the negative side their cover is real sparse (i.e. none) outside business hours.

    10. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember when Demon used to be good?

      Yes. Back when they had real people in customer service. Back when they sent you instructions on how to configure your Amiga to dial in. Back when you were stupid to use anyone else.

      Oh Demon, where for art thou? I havn't dealt with them since I got my Telewest^MBlueyonder^MVirgin broadband cable seven or eight years ago, but from what I hear they suck as much as the rest these days.

    11. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I shifted to Zen when I left Plus a few months ago, with a very similar story to yours. Aside from a few teething troubles getting it set up, most of which turned out to be BT's fault rather than Zen's, the technical service has been fine.

      The customer service at Zen is appalling, however. They don't have a 24-hour tech support number, for one thing, so there is no "quiet" time to call. After sitting on hold for 45 minutes during one of those teething troubles, my first question of the technical adviser was how many staff they had answering the phones that night. He dodged the question at least three times. I asked whether, since we both knew very well that I was paying around 50% over the odds to get Zen because they supposedly provided better service than other ISPs with similar packages, he thought it was reasonable for me to be on hold for 45 minutes just to follow up a call from the night before. "All I can do is apologise..." He even had the audacity to suggest that perhaps if we moved right along to my problem, it would help ease the pressure on their phone lines!

      Zen therefore have a black mark against them in my book as well. There must be UK ISPs who provide the equivalent of what I'm using (well under 5GB a month, "up to 8MB" speeds) for less than the 25 quid a month Zen charge, with better service. If and when I identify one, I will be taking advantage of Zen's month-at-a-time billing to leave them immediately.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    12. Re:Not surprising by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you live in a Virgin (NTL) area, I'd recommend their connection. I've had it for 6+ years, very few outages. Got the 10 meg one at the moment, get full speed whenever the remote site allows.

    13. Re:Not surprising by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

      Tesco I was with tesco broadband there was no fair usuage policy, I got (on my 512kbps line) a constant 50Kb download and always had a good (very low latency.) I am waiting to go back to them their doing a great deal for £24.95 of unlimited (and they actually mean unlimited) broadband which goes at the rate your line can provide (8Mbps for me.)
      Currently I'm with Tiscali, 5GB is what they actually mean (you get FUP'd here) latency is often 180ms and above and between 16:30 and 23:30 they shut down all but the http and ftp ports, killing HL2, bittorrent and any other game you might like.
      Your after a good supplier make sure theres none of this 'Fair Usuage Policy' stuff in the contract, hopefully if enough of us avoid it we can get every ISP to drop it.

    14. Re:Not surprising by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Pipex were excellent up until about 18 months ago. Then they started enforcing FUP conditions, and crippled torrent traffic 24 hours a day. A couple of months ago, they started kicking off people using 'excessive' bandwidth if they didn't agree to very restrictive new FUP conditions.

      Now, they're filtering all encrypted traffic to catch the RC4-based torrent encryption to 30KB/s - on an 8Mbs line. They won't even tell people what the limits are, though it's reckoned to be no more than 30-40GB a month.

      They also have eye-watering cancellation charges; my line was regraded from 1MB to 2MB 18 months ago, which secretly started a new minimum 12 month contract in their eyes. When I came to move house, they were going to chase me for £200 in early cancellation charges, so I got stuck with another new 12 month minimum contract at my new address. To be honest, the service is getting so unusable of an evening due to the filtering, I'm tempted to just take the hit to leave early.

      I have an 8Mb line, it can do 7.5Mb, and unless it's an http connection early in the morning, I get closer to a .5Mb line. It's not just me either, two of my friends on pipex are being similarly throttled in other areas.

      Stay the hell away from pipex, bulldog and whatever other poor sods they swallowed up. I'd also advise staying away from Tiscali and Orange, they have super-sikrit FUP policies too.

      The best bet is to go with an enta.net reseller; they seem to be upfront about the quotas you have, and don't traffic shape at all. One is adsl24.co.uk; has a good rep, I'm headed there the very day I can cancel pipex; 30GB pcm on peak, 300GB pcm off peak, for less than I'm paying pipex, with no goddamn shaping and a 1 month minimum contract. I can't wait.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    15. Re:Not surprising by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Also, when I was a customer, I would ring on some tech support issue and they would *tell me* (or anyone pretending to be me) my password. Not only is it stored in clear text. Not only does some arbitrary low-level tech support guy have access to it but they *tell you* if you ask, lol. I tried emailing them to suggest that this was foolish but these met with the email equivalent of the blank stare from someone who knows they're correct.

    16. Re:Not surprising by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I do some as-needed field tech work for an ISP around here. They will tell me the password for a customer's account when I call in and ask for it (on a "special techs only" phone number), but they won't tell YOU the password.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    17. Re:Not surprising by wild_quinine · · Score: 1

      I've been with plus.net for ages, they seemed fantastic after my truly awful experiences with Demon, but they've been much worse recently
      How the mighty have fallen. I've been around for a while, though not as long as some, and I can tell you with absolute clarity that there was a time when Demon were almost certainly the best ISP in the UK, and there was a time - long after that - when PlusNet were without any doubt the best ADSL provider in the country.

      This isn't their only gaffe, there was that, there was the email, there was also the complete decimation of all their users cgi bin data a couple of years ago. Now I back stuff up regularly, but that was a hit even for me.

      In actual fact I moved out of disgust when they took on a huge surge in new numbers due to being the only ADSL ISP with an unlimited data policy - and boy did they advertise it - and then shortly after that they started punishing all the heavy users with completely crippled accounts (makes Virgin Media's new policies seem generous). I was never one of those heavy users, but I left all the same.

      Hard to believe but just six months earlier they had a 24 hour tech support PHONE service, in the UK, and every guy I ever spoke to knew exactly what he or she was talking about.

      People have always spoken highly of pipex, for years and years, before broadband even twinkled. I've had no experience of them, but it's hard to argue with constancy.

    18. Re:Not surprising by ijakings · · Score: 1

      www.vispa.net They are a small specialised ISP who do truly unlimited broadband at fixed speeds. Its not cheap but you get what you pay for, Unbelievable customer service (the good kind of Unbelievable) and excellent speeds and connection. Moved there after EFH got bought out by 186k, and then 186k's migration plan was written on the back of a napkin, which was then lost.

    19. Re:Not surprising by Cato · · Score: 1

      I use Andrews and Arnold - http://www.aaisp.net.uk/. They give you 8-16 static IPv4 addresses for free, support IPv6 out of the box, are very reliable, and even text (SMS) me when the line goes down. They have lots of latency and loss tracking web reports, and online fault tracking, status blog, etc. Their techie-oriented page mentions some more nice features: URL:http://www.aaisp.net.uk/tech.html.

      Most importantly, you can get through to a real techie in about 30 seconds typically if you have a real problem. I'm on a usage-based tariff (unfortunately very common in UK) but this only applies during working days, not after 6pm or weekends, so I never go over 2 GB (don't do music/video stuff during the day).

      A colleague switched from Pipex to Andrews and Arnold and is quite impressed with them. And no, I don't get commission or own shares etc :)

    20. Re:Not surprising by easyTree · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then there's this (I shit you not) - please bear in mind that I'm not a Pipex customer, nor have I been during the last *five years*:

      --
      Dear Sir or Madam

      You may have noticed that we have not fully charged you for your Pipex services to date. This means your account has an outstanding balance of £46.88, which we plan to take payment for through debiting your credit card on or around 25th May 2007.

      We're really sorry for this mistake, which was caused by a problem with our internal systems not identifying when payments were due at the time. This is now fixed and we assure you that once we have collected the outstanding amount you will be fully up to date with all payments and we won't trouble you again with this matter.

      If you think we have got this wrong or would like to discuss this matter please do call our Credit Control Team on 0800 107 5905. Our office opening hours are Monday to Saturday 8am-9pm.

      Once again, please accept our apologies for any inconvenience this may cause.

      Yours sincerely,

      John Cox
      Associate Director of Credit
      Pipex Credit Control
      --

    21. Re:Not surprising by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      Pipex used to be superb, but nowadays they're just competent; nothing special, and a little pricey.

    22. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising at all.
      As someone who has worked for PlusNet in the past I know of at least one previous incidence which staff were ordered to keep schtum about. One night in 2002 there was a DDoS against crofters, one of the cgi servers. This was in fact a diversion tactic whilst someone hacked into another cgi server, criticalmass.

      They needn't have bothered as a slowdown in service was reported but the investigating NOC agent said nothing was wrong. 8 hours later and they realised criticalmass had been completely owned so it was yanked offline. Fair dues to them, in less than 12 hours they had a new criticalmass online and functioning.

      As far as users were concerned it was a temporary outage, and noone really asked why they were advised to change their passwords at the time. Unfortunately less than a week later someone realised that during the build of the new criticalmass, someone had gone and left a nice plaintext list of passwords in a world readable directory so that had to be fixed and people advised to change their passwords again.

      Bit of an uh-oh there, but at least the principal of keeping cgi scripts on their own servers paid off and nothing else got compromised.

      In this case, the info PlusNet have sent out indicates that since the compromise of the email system (less than a week to the email) they had conducted a full security audit and revealed a variety of unpatchable bugs. My question is, if it took less than a week then why wasn't this audit done before the service went live?

    23. Re:Not surprising by mistralol · · Score: 1

      I left plusnet 6 months ago for the following reasons Bandwidth limits. Crappy Support Slow speeds I have always done a roll my own email and since i have canceled my account i have no login details for plusnet what so ever but yet they keep spamming my email address with various emails about things like the webmail service issue and service changes etc... I have attempted to email their support and any public email addresses about 4/5 times to get my address removed and have so far failed to be in contact with anyone. This shows to me that they are greatly pathetic.

  3. Waiter, Can I have the bill please? by jamesjw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Honestly, if this happened to me, not only would I feel it my right to complain but to also seek out a new ISP.

    Nothing completely short of complete incompetence!

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
    1. Re:Waiter, Can I have the bill please? by uzytkownik · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you - it is IMHO totally irresponsible ISP.

      --
      I've probably left my head... somewhere. Please wait untill I find it.
      Homepage: http://blog.piechotka.com.pl/
  4. How your post reads - at a first glance by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why should we expect anything more than incompetence from shelleytherepublican.com? They probably run the inferior shelleytherepublican.com software anyway. Their lack of morals and shelleytherepublican.com is something only satanist democ-rats and shelleytherepublican.com could empathize with.

    While their Great Leader, shelleytherepublican.com, was in power, we could trust our oldest allies to loyally support our victory against the Iraqis, but alas, no more. I believe the only real solution is to liberate this backward nation, before it becomes a threat to our shelleytherepublican.com and forces us to use communist European shelleytherepublican.com.

    (With special thanks to the /. auto-linking URL system)

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    1. Re:How your post reads - at a first glance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (With special thanks to the /. auto-linking URL system)
      Which unfortunatly is triggered by http://./ Nice try though. :o)
  5. Email a fake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that be a laugh.

  6. They sent an email to their customers?! by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their webmail service was compromised this week, and spammers got hold of customers' e-mail addresses who they've been happily spamming away ever since. They've since made the decision to close their webmail service, in the ultimate admission of incompetence for the now BT owned ISP. In an e-mail to their customers...

    It's unlikely they'll actually be able to read this email given the fact that they're now drowning in spam...

    1. Re:They sent an email to their customers?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not drowning. My family have email address that has been affected. The total number of spam messages that have got through to me is around 20 to each address since the incident began.

      The spam messages themselves are very crude though. So I was extremely glad to be using Mac OS X parental controls for my kids email addresses. I quickly had a rule in place to deal with the incoming messages and the associated parental request emails.

    2. Re:They sent an email to their customers?! by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      I've actually had more emails from Plusnet apologising and informing of the availability or non-availability of webmail and other services than have had spam from Plusnet (11 spam emails since last weekend). I'm feeling somewhat left out!

    3. Re:They sent an email to their customers?! by mcfedr · · Score: 1

      at least they remove the spam for you though...if only in bulk, once every so often

    4. Re:They sent an email to their customers?! by narooze · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely they'll actually be able to read this email given the fact that they're now drowning in spam... Better yet, their webmail is closed, so they wouldn't be able to read it anyway (don't count on that ordinary people can configure a mail client, if they've even got that possibility).
  7. Lost emails by SuperGT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always worry about this. I use my gmail account as a sort of backup, just in case my laptop decides to fail. And I also keep loads of emails there with important information I may need later. I treat it as my safety net, but what if this was to happen? I understand that google and this ISP are probably years apart (as far as security and technology), but it still makes you wonder. Now I feel like making a backup on a thumbdrive, saving it on a dvd-r, etc.

    1. Re:Lost emails by wumpus188 · · Score: 1

      That is exatly the problem I had a year ago. The solution - get a cheap box, put Linux on it and install IMAP server.

    2. Re:Lost emails by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Google is all about redundancy. We hear these kinds of stories a lot but they don't actually happen to many companies at all.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    3. Re:Lost emails by mce · · Score: 1

      This is why I don't leave any mail on my ISP's server. Everything gets downloaded to my home desktop as soon as possible. This machine is automatically backed-up to a separate partition on the same disk on a daily basis. Once a week the latest of these daily backups is copied to a normally powered down external disk attached to my laptop. Finally, that disk is backed up regularly to another one that normally is not even on-site. The day that all of these things fail at the same time, I more than likely am not around to care anymore.

      The other reason why I download everything is that I do not want some random ISP admin to be able to read all my mail (current and past) or some random ad agency in disguise (need I still name them?) to scan it for profiling purposes.

    4. Re:Lost emails by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Use a third party email client locally.

      I use mac's so it's Apple Mail, but thunderbird works just fine. Set your gmail account to leave messages on the server. when you connect with thunderbird you download all messages that you already haven't gotten.

      you can archive stuff with gmail, and your local client will download those too.

      It is a great saftey net because it is unlikely both will fail at the same time. Plus once it is on your machine you can back it up as you like.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Lost emails by neural+cooker · · Score: 1

      I worry about this a lot too. On a hopefully helpful related story, I recently thought about using Amazon's S3 storing my essential data backups. Sure, they seem to have a great record of always being available and secure and all that, but who knows. My critical data would be handled by a corporation, which is black-box to me, who knows what is going on in there, or what might happen in the future. Also by them being a big company they would be a huge target for black-hat hackers. Could you imagine the cracker cred that someone would get for hacking into things like Gmail or S3? Plus, we all know that anything can be hacked given enough time.

      The short story is basically I can get a better, safer, cheaper backup plan by making copies on DVD's, or what have you, and storing one copy at home and one at a friend's house (in case of fire, etc.).

      I'm currently considering running my own email server at home and ditching my online mail accounts for the same sorts of reasons.

    6. Re:Lost emails by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      If you were seriously worried, I'd be going a little more expensive and getting some RAID into that... just felt the addition was necessary.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    7. Re:Lost emails by SuperGT · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the government should take tips from you. I understand the automatic back-up that happens (though you use the same disk), but the others are done manually? That sounds like a lot of work for someone who is too lazy to reply to emails from family members.

    8. Re:Lost emails by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      I looked at Amazon S3, however it turns out to cost the same over a 12 month period to buy a network attached hard disk, an ADSL router, small UPS and pay for connection and 12 months broadband at my brothers home 200 miles away, then do daily rsyncs. After year one the costs with this route plummet to the broadband connection and the electricity. The Amazon costs stay the same year on year.

      Even a DLT VS4 drive and half a dozen tapes is cheaper over a two year period than Amazon S3.

    9. Re:Lost emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I treat it as my safety net, but what if this was to happen?

      Then you're fucked and you got exactly what you paid for it: nothing.

    10. Re:Lost emails by mce · · Score: 1

      You're right, the second and third level backups are done manually. But it's not a lot of work, as each just involves a single file copy operation. My off-site disk is stored in a location that I need to pass by very frequently anyway. I just pick up the disk when I'm there and bring it back the next day or the day after.

      Regarding lazyness, it's all a matter of trade-off. Are you willing to loose your digital history or not? I sure as hell am not, so I make sure to have my backups under control. OTOH, wether or not I'd consider an e-mail worth replying to is a completely different matter: it seems perfectly possible to me to be "lazy" on that front while not being so on the backup one. One can always tell one's sister that the mail got misfilled or burried in work related e-mail, but it's impossible to restore a backup that never got made.

    11. Re:Lost emails by russ1337 · · Score: 1
      The company should have "partnered" with Gmail. They could have sent out an e-mail like this:

      "Dear valued PlusNet customer,

      PlusNet has recently partnered with Google for the provision of e-mail services. This new service will give you 2.7GB of e-mail storage space and the ability to access your e-mail via secure login from any computer with an internet connection. Of course you will still be able to download and send e-mail from your home PC just as you already do, but with the addition of Gmails world class spam and virus protection.

      Unfortunately you will be unable to keep your existing e-mail address, so to register for your email address visit: http://mail.google.com/mail/a-2472162305-fa494e274 1-65f53f6cf9

      If you haven't already heard about Gmail, it offers:
      - Over 2,700 megabytes (two gigabytes) of free storage
      - Built-in Google search that instantly finds any message you want
      - Automatic arrangement of messages and related replies into "conversations"
      - Powerful spam protection using innovative Google technology
      - No large, annoying ads--just small text ads and related pages that are relevant to the content of your messages

      We kindly request that you transfer your account immediately as our current PlusNet e-mail services will cease in 7 days. See here for assistance in transferring your contact data and address book to Gmail here"
      Yours sincerely

      The (incompetent) Management .
    12. Re:Lost emails by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I worry the same - but then I stared using Mozy with my own encryption key (2gb space for free), and it backs up my thunderbird folder every half hour so I don't worry about that anymore, now I just worry about forgetting my key :)

  8. units, people, watch your units. by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "700 Gb" does not seem much (divide by gmail box size and you get the number of 200 maxed out beefy gmail users), because it is an idiotic measure of stolen goods. "X raped whopping 500 women pounds", "Y stole 4500 banknotes from the bank", "Z trespassed 100 feet of my property".

    Reminds me of the Russian cartoon for kids, where different animals measure their sizes relative to the sizes of other animals, and in the end the Python says "I am much longer in Kakadoo than in Elephants".

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:units, people, watch your units. by ShadowFalls · · Score: 1

      I can't say as I do not know what PlusNet's email capacity limit for each account was, but most ISPs have small limits 20mb or less for each account, if it was so, 700GB is a hell of an impact. Some people might not even know what they lost.

    2. Re:units, people, watch your units. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      If you actually followed the story at the time, the vast bulk of the email lost was stuff that had already been downloaded at least once from their mail servers and customers had just left it there. Very few unread emails where actually lost, and Plus.Net don't advertise their email service as something that you can leave emails on. It is strictly a store and forward service, with a webmail option for when you are travelling.

  9. Security software by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Network director Phil Webb goes on to recommend that their customers install security software, along with telling them that they shouldn't call up to complain. One might suggest that they need to practice what they preach."
    A few comments:
    1. They almost certainly were using security software. The problem is that it is awfully difficult to judge effective security software from the much more common snake oil that is out there.
    2. There is a decent chance that the breach was not the fault of the security software but some kind of human error. They probably made the common mistake of assuming all they had to do was install firewall, intrusion detection and anti-malware tools and they were magically fully protected.
    3. This kind of event will probably become commonplace. There is a lot of money to be made, the crackers are technically more competent than much of the sysadmin community, and they only need to attack at the weakest points.
    1. Re:Security software by joto · · Score: 1

      They almost certainly were using security software. The problem is that it is awfully difficult to judge effective security software from the much more common snake oil that is out there.

      Obviously not. Assuming they used security software, this ISP certainly learned the difference.

      There is a decent chance that the breach was not the fault of the security software but some kind of human error. They probably made the common mistake of assuming all they had to do was install firewall, intrusion detection and anti-malware tools and they were magically fully protected.

      That's certainly excusable for a naïve end-user. But if you are that naïve, you should at the very least hire a tech, before you start your own ISP-business.

    2. Re:Security software by Serious+Poo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No offense intended, but when you say "almost certainly", "there's a decent chance", and "will probably" that means that you don't really know and are making assumptions and/or generalizations. I'm not so forgiving in my view of this ISP's actions - it appears that they messed up big time. While I completely agree that there's a lot of FUD in the security marketplace these days, it's the responsibility of management to hire people who know this stuff cold. People who know that it's "People, Process, and Technology" - in that order. Any company that goes and implements Technology (i.e., a security product) without first considering People (e.g., training & hiring competent people) and Process elements (e.g., adequate supporting policies, procedures, security architectures, reviews/audits) is at considerable risk of failing by design. Companies that make money from processing/storing/selling/brokering people's sensitive information have a responsibility to safeguard their customer's data. This ISP appears to have failed in that regard.

      --
      "There is nothing more unequal than the equal treatment of unequal people." - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Security software by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      There was a flaw in the third party software they where using for web mail, and they suffered from a zero day attack. Hardly Plus.Nets fault. On those grounds everyone using Microsoft software would be in for trouble.

      On the plus side they are activating their spam filtering for free, which was previously a paid for service.

      As a Plus.Net customer I have not actually been effected, as I ditch all email addressed directly to the account, as I have a domain hosted with them, and that does not appear to have been effected.

    4. Re:Security software by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      They used a proprietary web mail product, which suffered from a 0day attack.

      Obviously this is not desireable, but it can happen to any software... The real reason they turned it off, is because due to the webmail system being proprietary, they can't fix this problem so it will only get compromised repeatedly.

      Also, most of the webmail systems i've seen don't hold any data or authentication details themselves, they just hook over an imap server, so by hacking the webmail system you can only compromise the users who actually use it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:Security software by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      There was a flaw in the third party software they where using for web mail, and they suffered from a zero day attack. Hardly Plus.Nets fault.

      On the contrary. The software they chose to use was bug-ridden — and I don't mean subtle, occasional bugs, I mean "incapable of even performing its basic functions correctly" — and this was abundantly clear to anyone who had tried to use it for more than a few minutes and received a couple of HTML e-mails. It doesn't require a 45th level geek to appreciate that such software is also likely to be unreliable and insecure.

      So, either Plus didn't test the software, or they tested it but missed the fact that it was clearly broken, or they tested it, knew that it was broken, but went ahead and used it anyway. All of these scenarios make the problems Plus's fault, and they are the only possible scenarios that explain what happened. This is negligence, pure and simple.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  10. Enough by leathered · · Score: 1

    Well if it's not incompetence that mars PlusNet's service then it's deception. Over the last couple of years customers have had to endure blatent throttling of P2P and caps on bandwidth, the closure of their binary Usenet service and customers being banned from their forums for daring to criticise them.

    I can only blame myself for staying for so long. My previous ISP provided an excellent service but was far more expensive. As always, you get what you pay for.

    --
    For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    1. Re:Enough by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      I used to be with a wonderful ISP known as Metronet. They were cheap, but had *really* clued up staff (i.e. when you phone you don't speak to phone monkeys - you speak to actual techs). Meanwhile, a shite ISP called PlusNet who had been publicly floated, wanted to impress share holders with their fantastic management team so decided to buy a small-ish ISP, namely Metronet and then proceeded to migrate Metronet customers to the PlusNet platform resulting to many of them leaving (including me). All the while they kept saying how this new system would be much better, blah blah, and then something would break really badly, and there would be another excuse.

      Seriously, PlusNet are simply a sack of shit. That's all that's to it!

    2. Re:Enough by Arimus · · Score: 1

      They didn't used to be shite....

      At one point PN where probably the best ISP in the UK - sadly after floating on the stock market those days soon came to an end at the alter of shareholder profits and sod the customer :(.

      Anyway even while a good ISP one thing PN had going for it was the customer forums - usually had a lot of knowledgable people on so even if you ran some odd software/os/hardware combination or wanted to do something beyond a simple mail form on your website you'd get alot of community help.

      It now (just had a browse of the forums today) sadly looks like the community is starting to die on its feet as well.

      RIP Plusnet.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  11. This is *not* a solution! by The+tECHIDNA · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From PlusNet's letter:
    In the meantime, if you use Webmail to check your PlusNet email from your own PC, you might find it more convenient to use an email program which runs on your PC instead.

    So let me get this straight: PlusNet's closing down the WebMail service, but leaves the main e-mail server running, so

    (1) the spam still comes in to the e-mail addresses
    (2) users now cannot access via their Internet Browser and must use an e-mail client which may not filter spam as well (or sometimes at all)

    Brilliant!
    Who's running this company -- Moe, Larry, or Curly?

    1. Re:This is *not* a solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paula Bean perhaps?

    2. Re:This is *not* a solution! by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      (1) the spam still comes in to the e-mail addresses Its not like we didn't get spam before this happened.
    3. Re:This is *not* a solution! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      (2) users now cannot access via their Internet Browser and must use an e-mail client which may not filter spam as well (or sometimes at all)

      In what way is this worse than accessing it via a browser, where you rely on PlusNet's own spam filtering, which is proven not to work well (or at all)?

      I can always install Thunderbird and use its built-in filtering. Or I can even setup my own mailserver (I like bogofilter and IMAP) and use fetchmail to collect my email. But I cannot do anything about the shitty or nonexistant filtering that PlusNet themselves are doing.

      I would much rather have email working only via standards designed for email (SMTP, POP3, IMAP) than only via webmail.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    4. Re:This is *not* a solution! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Brillant!

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  12. The same Freedom2Surf that were bought by PIPEX? by TheScienceKid · · Score: 4, Informative

    PIPEX are looking to be bought out. Maybe by tiscali.

    Get a real ISP, like Black Cat Networks or Andrews and Arnold Ltd. Alternatively, UKFSN (an Enta.net reseller) are pretty good, if you're tighter around the pocket.

    [Captcha: protests]

  13. Couldn't find a UK host, but I sure tried hard. by SpzToid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I tried Pipex and was unimpressed, among several UK hosts. Still, they did come through on their 30-day money back guarantee, and on the last day possible even.

    I had a client that *required* a use a host within the UK and I never did manage. It was a nightmare. In the U.S. I use Dreamhost http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?134994 in L.A., Even though I'm in Amsterdam using Drupal which requires much server interaction, I'm very pleased with my subscription for nearly 2 years already. I've seen and heard of similar good US hosts, and some nearly as competitive here in the Netherlands, but I'd really like a solid UK host with skillz to step up to ./ and tell us what they've got, and why they deserve our business.

    - - - -
    you can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    1. Re:Couldn't find a UK host, but I sure tried hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try http://uk2.net/. I've never had a problem with them and their hosting prices are not far off US prices.

      Hmm nice attempt to get some referral points with dreamhost there.

    2. Re:Couldn't find a UK host, but I sure tried hard. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Avoid uk2 like the plague...
      They are a buch of cowboys, and they make many horrendously stupid security mistakes.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:Couldn't find a UK host, but I sure tried hard. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      My isp sucks worse than yours. I have to use hughes net over satellite. The laws of physics demand that I have a min ping time of 500ms.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    4. Re:Couldn't find a UK host, but I sure tried hard. by Gossi · · Score: 1

      I use United Hosting, which is based in the UK, with UK servers. Have done for years. No problems. They're really good. No Windows hosting, though.

  14. I understand other BT costumers aren't happy... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like, um...this guy.

    1. Re:I understand other BT costumers aren't happy... by Blackheim · · Score: 1

      Fucking brilliant. *wipes tears from eyes*

  15. PlusNet reached a high 5 years ago, and down since by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in like 2000 or so, PlusNet were actually good.

    Seems that they haven't invested in their services enough since, nor their administrative staff, so you get issues like this. Rather poor really, no idea why BT bought them.

  16. in soviet russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In soviet russia the ISPs shut down the spammers

    1. Re:in soviet russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be a good thing

  17. Doesn't matter... by Elsan · · Score: 0

    Now that STARCRAFT 2 is announced!!!111!!one

  18. From their status page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    19/05/2007 @ 14:28 Reports of Spam Email (42837) - UPDATE

    This is an update to the previously reported issue regarding the increased volume of unsolicited email being sent to some customers' mailboxes. A copy of the last update can be seen here:-

    http://usertools.plus.net/status/archive/117952039 0.htm

    Following the withdrawal of our Webmail service on Wednesday, we have been working around the clock to build a replacement platform for our customers. This solution is now in final testing and we envisage that it should roll live this evening.

    We will provide a further update once one is available.

    Kind Regards,

    Chris Parr
    Customer Support

  19. PlusNet V Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. Data Protection Act? by Phil246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Customers of this ISP may want to check to see if they can take action against them under the data protection act.
    in particular, the sections:
    "Personal data should be securely kept, and not transferred to any other country without adequate protection."
    and
    "Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data."

    ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Protection_Act )

    1. Re:Data Protection Act? by Peet42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a pretty sad state of affairs. I used to be with Plus Net, and they used to be really good. I dropped their service when they sacked a lot of their technical guys and hired a premium-rate call centre to handle their technical queries through a very s...l...o...w... script instead of just talking to you on an ordinary national-rate 'phone line to talk to someone who actually knew what was going on. The guys in the call centre used to look at the same web page as I did to find out if there were any problems.

      But the most impressive thing about the article remains the idea that they closed their webmail service, and then emailed their users to tell them...

  21. Re:Typical Limey Incompetence by clickclickdrone · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I wish I had some mod points left, that was brilliant! Inspired! Good one :-)
    (who marked this troll? sort out your humour dude)

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  22. Eclipse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.eclipse.net.uk/

    Been with them for over 3 years and had an outage only twice, they're also quite lax about their usage policy if you opt for the highest package although even whilst on the cheapest they never throttled me even though I quite often went over the quota.
    They're reasonably price too. They should be offering up to 24meg soon too, check your local exchange and see if they've LLU'ed yet.

    1. Re:Eclipse by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      I've never used Eclipse.... but I've read quite a lot of bad things!

      Their ratings aren't exactly top either:
      thinkbroadband.com - Service Provider Comparison

  23. Re:I'm one of the victims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been with PlusNet a long time, they used to be excellent, however as has been observed their service is NOT what it was and is getting worse.. Thanks to their incompetence I am now getting dozens of SPAMs each day on an account that never got any (I keep it to friends and family). All the family have had to turn on SPAM filters for their accounts, and yes that was and is possible if you watch who you give email addresses to.

    This time PlusNet waited days to tell us what had happened. (I assumed a close friend's system had been infected and skimmed, I never even thought the ISP had screwed up).

    Information was the minimum they could pass on, I still have no idea if the SPAMMERs had access to the emails, but I assume they did, fortunately I never pass sensitive data in emails, but a LOT of people treat email as if it was a real letter..

    I think the best part is the pointer to their web site in the email the eventually sent out. It has "Tips on avoiding SPAM".. I read it and somehow they left out "And no matter what you do we can publish your address and all your efforts come to nothing."

    They've not only been throttling P2P (I found it quicker to download the UBUNTU Feisty ISO via HTTP than over Bittorrent!). They are obsessed with pushing you to use their Website rather than calling them. I've always recommended that you don't use an ISP which doesn't have a reasonably priced phone number. My last query on the PlusNet "No Help Now" website was ignored for a week until I *had* to phone them.

    I left BT because of the appalling service and now I am looking to move off PlusNet, fortunately the UK opened up the exchanges so I have a wide choice, it's just a matter of finding one that offers a decent customer support and isn't being ruined by BT.

  24. We can just blame this on sysadmins ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    We can just blame this on sysadmins that don't want to work at underpaying jobs with bad managers that don't give any respect and corporate executives that don't really give a damn about quality of service.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  25. Re:Typical Limey Incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow... After reading that link-bait you posted, I have a newfound sense of respect for the complete and utter stupidity human beings are capable of. Before you go and trash something, maybe you should do a little research, or pull your head out of your ass long enough to take of breath of reality.

    I'm not calling you unamerican, unpatriotic, or uncivilized; just stupid.

    Regarding what you posted here: don't use someone else's article to further your own political agenda. If you want to do that, post your own fucking article, so that the powers that be can smite it down for being a dimwitted attempt at undeserved notoriety.

    Go kill yourself. Now.

  26. Crossovers by fmobus · · Score: 1

    C'mon... it's not like everyone here read theDailyWTF.com

    and that, my friends, is worse than failure

  27. Re:Pipex? I think of the Hoff by PalmAddict · · Score: 1

    Even though I am in the US, when ever I hear of Pipex I can think of only one thing:

    THE HOFF - King of the Internet

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jphpzjar2y4

  28. let me get this straight... by fmobus · · Score: 1

    people get CHARGED PREMIUM to call helpdesk? WTF dude? In my country, helpdesk lines are ALWAYS 800-like (I think it's even mandatory). Of course, you're gonna pay for this in your monthly bill, but I think this is fair.

    1. Re:let me get this straight... by Phil246 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, its a common practise in the UK for a corporation who wants to squeeze a little more off their customers.
      It sure doesnt go down well but there is very little option at times.

    2. Re:let me get this straight... by blowdart · · Score: 1

      Except it's not actually true; plusnet's support numbers (at the bottom of every page) have a direct, Sheffield number and an 0845 (local rate) number. Neither are premium rate.

    3. Re:let me get this straight... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      It's a common practice here. I often suspect the shadier ISPs of bringing their DNS servers down for a few hours on a Saturday afternoon just for the flurry of premium-rate 'phone calls it nets them.

      Plus Net were one of the few that had a "normal" 'phone number staffed by tech-savvy people who could usually help you in seconds. As this was obviously a net drain on resources, they decided to turn tech support into a net earner by hiring a premium rate call cantre, then giving them a "script" to work from designed to take as long as possible to get to the point where they admitted they didn't know what was wrong and escalated your call to one of the few remaining tech staff. (Or, increasingly frequently, dropping the line as they tried to transfer you thus forcing you to go through the whole thing again)

      That's the main reason I dropped their service.

    4. Re:let me get this straight... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't get the mailshot explaining their "rationalisations". For the last three weeks I was with them, at least, a call to one of those numbers just got a 'phone tree leading to a recorded message asking you to call the new "support centre" number. They just didn't want to reprint all the stationery.

    5. Re:let me get this straight... by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      0845 is _NOT_ local rate...
      It is LO-CALL rate, which is a revenue sharing service. It is charged at the same cost local rate calls used to be in the early 90s, and it is always charged by the minute regardless of your phone service plan. Also, inclusive minutes usually don't count for calls to 0845 numbers.
      BT charge a flat rate of 5p for a 1 hour national landline call at evenings and weekends on their lowest call plan, a 1 hour evening or weekend call to an 0845 number would cost 120p evenings and 60p weekends. BT's higher calling plans (options 2 and 3) charge you nothing for the first 60 minutes to a national number at evenings or weekends (again 0845 arent included) and in the case of option 3, also during the day.

      What's worse is, a share of the call revenue goes to the company operating the number (which is why BT can't offer free calls to 0845) which gives these companies an incentive to keep you on hold.
      In essence, 0845 really is premium rate. It may be a lower per-minute cost than 09 premium rate numbers, but it works in just the same way.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0845 is _NOT_ local rate... He was making the point about the 0114 number I think, although if you're on a POTS phone 0845 probably will be the same as local. As you've said, many "call packages" exclude 08 numbers from e.g. "free calls", which is why the 0114 number is there - it's a geographic number, and therefore included. It won't always be local (although it is to me - I live about 30 miles from Sheffield).

      To be fair to Plusnet - they could have enforced 0870-only access (i.e. "old national rate, but probably if you're calling from anything other than a plain BT line, and then some").
    7. Re:let me get this straight... by blowdart · · Score: 1

      What stationary? It's on the *website*

    8. Re:let me get this straight... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      You're doing better than I was. At the time I left them, there was no way at all to get through the phone menu system to speak to a real person. I'm pretty sure about this, because I tried all the remotely plausible paths through the menus, as my phone bill will testify.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    9. Re:let me get this straight... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      What's worse is, a share of the call revenue goes to the company operating the number (which is why BT can't offer free calls to 0845) which gives these companies an incentive to keep you on hold.. Thats ending later this year, number holders no longer get a cut of the call revenue for lo-call numbers.
    10. Re:let me get this straight... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      I suspect you'll find it's on both. It's much cheaper to put a recorded message on an existing number than it is to search for every occurrence of an old number and replace it.

    11. Re:let me get this straight... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Ehm...
      0845 is never the same as local, do BT even have a local rate anymore anyway?
      On the cheapest BT plan, daytime calls could be charged at the same rate as 0845, but i do believe theyre actually 1p/min cheaper... Anywhere else (more expensive BT plans, voip phones, mobiles) 0845 is always more expensive than regular 01/02 landline calls.
      And what with the prevelence of mobiles nowadays, the idea of "local" is pretty meaningless.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:let me get this straight... by evilbetty · · Score: 1

      http://www.saynoto0870.com/ will give you the 08xx number as the geographic number so you can use bt's offers, just remember to use 141.

    13. Re:let me get this straight... by u38cg · · Score: 1

      And if you haven't come across it yet, this is what you need to deal with these annoying numbers.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  29. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh FFS get it right. The software's bought from another company (so it's not their fault). They found a bug in it which was being exploited, so they've quite sensibly taken it offline until the bugs are fixed. Once they're fixed it'll be put back online again.

    Seems like the right thing to do since they knew there was a problem. Plenty of other ISPs might have left it running until it was silently fixed.

  30. So who else uses @mail? by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

    According to Plusnet the problems were exploited before being known about publicly and the leak of email addresses is "not possible to patch". If this is true, then it's rather less of a faux pas than some of their previous problems. Having had the pleasure of dealing with Plus customer support a few times over the last few months I'd be interested to see some corroboration of what the problems actually were from elsewhere, rather than just taking their word for it, though.

    The bigger question is who is else using @mail externally out there and if Plus are right, why? Have @mail said anything about the problem? I'm assuming we're talking about these people - http://atmail.com/ - but there seems to be nothing obvious on their site.

    1. Re:So who else uses @mail? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      It is the same Atmail software, although I hear that Plusnet made custom modifications to the software. Difficult to say, perhaps a programmer made changes and he is no longer working there, perhaps its an older version of the software they won't/can't upgrade. I did see Atmail has an update out on the 17th...

      This has a little bit about the situation:

      http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/i/3088.html

  31. I'm surprised that this is even a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd always assumed that most email addresses such as "fred@anonymouscoward.plus.com" that gets regularly used is going to get spammed - sooner or later an email recipient's PC is going to get infected and the address will become public that way. Changing the mailbox - i.e. to "frederic@" instead of "fred@" isn't going to help since spammers seem to try "anythingresemblingahumanname@anonymouscoward.plus .com" when they're sending.

    In the short term I can understand why people are annoyed, but it's something that they will need to get the hang of sooner or later anyway.

  32. Try Andrews and Arnold by gentry · · Score: 2, Informative

    Andrews & Arnold (http://www.aaisp.net.uk/) have been excellent for me. IPv6, as many IPs as you need, excellent customer service, free domain with a standard ADSL account, unlimited downloads in the evening, IMAP/POP/webmail access with antispam & virus. I've been with them for a few months now and they have been by far the best ISP I have come across in the UK. They do limit usage during the day (I'm on 1GB a month during 0800-1800 Mon-Fri), but over usage is charged in small increments, should you go over it. I'm a pretty heavy user, and I've still not managed to hit my usage limit. If you look on the web site they have an IRC channel where users and staff are happy to help out and answer any questions about the service.

  33. Talk to Mumbai by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the eager and well paid sysadmins in Mumbai and Bangalore will get right on that problem.

    1. Re:Talk to Mumbai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To my knowledge, all the support/sysadmin stuff is done from their offices in the UK.

    2. Re:Talk to Mumbai by gelfling · · Score: 1

      It's just a rhetorical point. One way or another the suits will drive us all to the bottom.

  34. No, not surprising at all by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    I was with Plus for many years, but their service deteriorated dramatically around a year to 18 months ago.

    At the time, they made it unreasonably difficult to get a transfer authorisation for my BT line to move to another ADSL ISP, and the rules requiring all ISPs to give transfer authorisations within a reasonable time hadn't yet come into force, so I would have lost connection for probably a month during the move. Since I knew I would be moving house fairly soon, I put up with them until then, when I could cancel without losing connection unnecessarily. I didn't even consider signing up for their service at the new place, though.

    Frankly, it amazes me it's taken this long for their webmail service to be cracked. They shifted to some funny "@mail" system a few months before I left them, and it was hopelessly easy to break with simple HTML e-mails and the like. It was also bug-ridden to the point of being almost unusable at times.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go back to being smug that I'm no longer with them, and humming "I told you so" to myself. Which I did, in several problem reports I raised, all of which they fobbed off. Ain't karma wonderful? :-)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  35. You have to admire the British by Bombula · · Score: 1
    in the ultimate admission of incompetence

    Personally, I think the British have an admirable demeanor in the face of adversity or even outright defeat, as compared to the US for example. Stiff upper lip, all that stuff. Surely it's better to admit incompetence than not? Then again, maybe it's just our (American) culture of denial that annoys me.

    --
    A-Bomb
  36. Captcha by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

    [Captcha: protests]

    What does that mean? Does Slashdot require some users to pass "captcha" tests before posting?

    1. Re:Captcha by Darthmalt · · Score: 2

      Means that his captcha word was "protests". Sometimes the randomly generated words match the story / comment so people post it at the bottom of the comment as an amusing sidenote.

    2. Re:Captcha by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      I've posted to Slashdot hundreds of times and never seen a captcha here.

    3. Re:Captcha by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      Log out then without logging in hit reply to comment and you will see one.

    4. Re:Captcha by compro01 · · Score: 1

      you only get it when you post without logging in. it's an anti-automated spam thing.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:Captcha by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      But he's not posting as an AC, so he must have been logged in...

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    6. Re:Captcha by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      He could have been logged out at the time, on the anonymous post screen is a login form AND a CAPTCHA.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  37. You lose data, I'm gone. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter how little or how much. It doesn't matter if my stuff was even affected.

    If I'm trusting you with my data, that means I've decided you'll probably be at least as careful with it as I would be, and it will probably save me some time from having to do my own backups and such. In the case of email, it would mean that I'm sick of running my own mailserver, worrying about whether I'm online or not, etc etc...

    If your service goes down for a bit, I might be able to understand, especially if it's a one-time thing. But if you lose data, that means you're far less competent than -- oh -- my 16-year-old brother. And it means that the second I hear about it, I'll already be signing up with someone else, or building my own competing service.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  38. Mod parent down by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 1

    Tryin to scam a referral bonus outta slashdot readers? Meh.

    You'd have more credibility if you were pimping out a higher quality host. DH oversells their capacity, and is about average for bargain basement junk. I tried their $10/yr promo a while back to run a small image g2 gallery. I'd say it wasn't worth $10. Their MySQL server was unreliable (lots of downtime), the httpd server I was on was quite slow, and even after canceling the account I get spam from them.

    --
    The revolution will be mocked
    1. Re:Mod parent down by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      All the same, I use them because I have yet to find better. So I recommend them too. This is what I use, it is the best I have found so far. I've got a few dozen sites, more configurations than trafficked sites, but I'm pleased given my purposes and hours spent interacting with the servers myself; and the whole package. I'm trying to figure out how to make best use of their subversion component this weekend, as a matter of fact. Splendid, IMHO.

      So in my defense, I claim no scam.

      but this is off-topic. I'm still hoping to find a good host in the UK. Fortunately someone in another part of this thread listed some to try; they looked promising.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  39. Useless bunch of idiots by kirun · · Score: 1

    I cancelled months ago, and was still hit by the problem. Luckily, since I always sign up with unique addresses, the one in question is now forwarded to abuse@plus.net , and they can deal with the damage.

    --
    I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
  40. Re:I'm one of the victims... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

    Instead of blaming PlusNet, why don't you blame the criminal spammers who are assaulting your e-mail account? We seem to acquire this apathetic attitude towards spam as if there's nothing we can do about it... it's just a fact of life that half our e-mail or more is going to be garbage. Why do people accept this?

  41. say what now? by Deadplant · · Score: 1

    Their webmail service was compromised this week, and spammers got hold of customers' e-mail addresses who they've been happily spamming away ever since. yeesh, What the hell is that sentence supposed to mean?
    Aside from the grammatical problems, what does the author mean by "spammers got hold of customers' e-mail addresses"? Do they actually mean that spammers aquired login access to email accounts?

    oh, and no, I don't feel like reading the fine article.
  42. Re:I'm one of the victims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry, by that logic I shouldn't blame my bank for leaving the door unlocked and the vault door open.. It would be the nasty thieves fault...

    I had done something, I haven't had a SPAM for five years on the main accounts and my daughter had never had an offer to enlarge an organ she doesn't have in all that time... Now she is getting five a day, as well infinte numbers of offers to download Photoshop...

    This was a web server application, it is NOT rocket science to lock the damned thing down, there are a fair number of tools for testing the locks, and if PlusNet don't know how to do that then they shouldn't be running an ISP.

    As I say, my family is being bombarded with SPAM and since it's PlusNet that screwed up and they have not apologised, then I am moving. Fool me once.... (When they lost my mail) now they've fooled me twice...

  43. Re:I'm one of the victims... by AndrewM1 · · Score: 2

    They are obsessed with pushing you to use their Website rather than calling them.

    Seems so appropriate
  44. Re:Typical Limey Incompetence by VagaStorm · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Totally off topic, but that site was hilarious!!!!! Recommend having a look :p
    Teasers:

    Fact File: What is a Kernel? This component is used for typing in simple commands like "dir" and "more". Windows has a component called "cmd.exe" which serves a similar purpose but comes with better commands. Windows programmers often use a modern graphical user interface in preference to a kernel, however Linux users do not have this luxuary.

    Fact File: What is source code? Old computer programs were distributed as source-code on magnetic tape. This is an obsolete way to distribute software that was used before the availablity of the more convenient "Binary" format. Even today, some programs (such as those written by GNU) are released as source code only. Perversely, this is to prevent the software from being used outside the fraternity of computer hackers.
    :D :D :D :D :D
  45. Re:I'm one of the victims... by keithjr · · Score: 1

    In an ideal world, the blame would be shared. True, PlusNet made a terrible error due to their own incompetence. There is no reason why they should not be punished accordingly. And, in the end, with all the lost business from people like yourself, their punishment may come in the form of annihilation.

    However, I still agree that ISPs are too often taking a reactive approach to these disasters rather than taking simple preventive measures. It's great that PlusNet's director goes on the line now to recommend security software, but why wasn't this already mandated to every user BEFORE this all took place? Until ISPs take serious action to break down botnets, pro-actively blacklist compromised computers, and secure the integrity of their own records, things are going to continue to get worse.

  46. Not just affecting PlusNet customers by zombieflesheater · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed a sudden increase in spam since 13 May, perhaps on previously spam-free addresses?

    This might have affected you even if you're not a PlusNet customer. I use them as my ISP, but I host my email on a different server, so my details weren't compromised. Or so I thought. Turns out that address books and customer correspondence were stolen as well as PlusNet's email database, so if you've ever corresponded with someone@username.plus.com, your address could have been nicked along with theirs.

    Now several of my previously spam-free addresses have started giving me investment and health advice. Not impressed >:o[

    ISPs must be given an economic incentive to put their customers' privacy first if cases like this are to be prevented in future. I'll be voting with my wallet as soon as I can. I hope a large number of similarly affected people join me, and let this be remembered by all /.ers when next you consider a switch.

    (More details on my blog.)