Slashdot Mirror


Municipal Wi-Fi Networks In Trouble

imamac writes "According to an AP story, municipal Wi-Fi is going nowhere fast. A think tank research director quipped, 'They are the monorails of this decade: the wrong technology, totally overpromised and completely undelivered.' Subscriptions to the services are much lower than expected and lawmakers are concerned that millions of dollars will have gone to waste that could have been better spent on roads or crime-fighting. Satisfaction with the quality of service has also been low, which give some insight into the low adoption rate. Is municipal Wi-Fi just a bad idea, has it been poorly implemented, or is the technology just not there to support such an endeavor?"

2 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Harry Browne said it best... by giorgiofr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe - just maybe - we noticed that everything the gov't does could have been done better, chaper and faster by private companies or individuals? Besides, anybody who is not an anarchap supports, by definition, at least SOME amount of gov't interference in people's and companies' business and as such is a socialist. Yeah, I know you don't like being called as such but realize that's what you are, if you support public schools, police, transport, army, public anything.

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  2. Re:Harry Browne said it best... by gauss314 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Exactly how does not having clothes interfere with your right to life? Nudists seem to manage quite well without it, as do the few remaining tribal folks. Same for shelter, unless, you think that nomads and homeless people are dead. As for food, how can you stipulate, that someone who spends their life in the production of food, owes any of it to you? Doesn't your own socialist philosophy require that you "mix your labor" with it? In fact, to get to the core of the discussion, the socialist requires that others provide for them, and be forced to do so, if necessary. The libertarian does not. The libertarian ideal is that people should cooperate when it is to their MUTUAL benefit. Socialism, on the other hand, forces people to cooperate via the business end of the government. Hence, maybe you should be a little less dependent on using the power of government to force other to follow your advice, and provide you with all the luxuries that you seek, before starting to sound like a lazy fanatical thug.

    --


    If there weren't so many damn idiots in this world, I'd just be average.