Hearing Date Set for SCO vs. Novell
duh P3rf3ss3r writes "According to Groklaw, a hearing into seven summary judgement motions in the SCO vs. Novell case has been set for 31 May at 9 am before Judge Dale Kimball. Groklaw's PJ speculates that David Boies may have to show up for SCO just to keep their case alive."
Enough time to get popcorn and coke then :D
This is the sig that says NI (again)
...that really bites. Where will we get our schadenfreude after the SCO thing has been laughed out of court?
Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
For a second there I thought it said David Bowie. I suppose if he showed up it would help too.
...to invest heavily into Put-options of SCO. Then again, with them already listing in the penny-stock area, maybe rather invest in the spam companies that send out the pump'n'dump mails...
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Judge Dread and David Bowie must appear? Wait, I think the coffee has brewed. (SCO stories are always at least a two-cup problem and I'm down a cup this morning. Fill'er up, premium!)
One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
SCO Attorney: Your honor, we'd like to rectify the use of our patents but since they are propietary information we cannot disclose them publicly.
Novell Attorney: Your honor there are no infringements. If SCO could present the infringments they would. Their use of the word "propietary" is solely FUD based manipulations
Prosecutor Attorney: Did you say Fud?
Juror Attorney: *whispers to another juror* I didn't even know they infringed on Warner Bros, patented Looney Tune character Elmer Fudd"
Judge Attorney: *Watching Judge Judy in the background*
Infiltrated dot Net