Slashdot Mirror
Best Presidential Candidate for Nerds?
blast writes "Given the broad field of candidates, I was wondering who the community thinks will make the best President when it comes to representing issues Slashdot readers might care about? Eg: privacy, 'total information awareness', Internet regulation and taxation, net neutrality, copyright/patent reform, the right to read, the right to secure communications, the right to tinker. Who do you think best represents your views? "
Trolls don't actually read Slashdot. They're not even PEOPLE for heaven's sake! Not even 2/5ths of a person.
I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
Ron Paul? Racist, Jew-baiting Ron Paul? Economic nitwit Ron Paul who would put us back on the gold standard? "Libertarian" pro-lifer Ron Paul who supports states' rights when it suits his homophobia?
I suggest you google around before deciding to support this guy. And my instincts say don't rely on Wikipedia; ten to one says he's their libertarian darling.
Make Slashdot readable! See journal.
He is, specifically Texas, where one must acknowledge "a higher power" to take an oath of office.
Determining whether or not Texas is *really* a U.S. state is left as an exercise to the reader...
0 1 - just my two bits
I've entered fucking retardville. ...a moronic post with moron scoring. What grand 'ol state are you living in? I'll take my shitty red state over whatever small minded, crap hole, socialist feed bag you live in.
btw...to the Al Gore posters...Al Gore is just another profiteering oil man. His old money is from oil and his new money will be from his "carbon offset" shell game. You get nothing new with Al Gwhore.
We're counting on:
1. A big earthquake sloughing you shits off and into the brine.
or
2. Giving your land mass back to Mexico. Bone up on your Spanish, dude. I'm sure most of the works of Stalin have already been translated for you.
It is refreshing that the people of the United States have managed to push the leftist-nut-factor all the way over to the left coast, freeding the rest of the country of that malady.
If we Americans elect a Republican we will be so burdened by stupid anti-terrorism laws that we won't be able to visit your country.
Since few Americans speak fluent Arabic, and typical 'ugly American' tourists have little interest at all in Islam, why would we be visiting his country in the first place? I am assuming he is writing from somewhere in what was formerly called Europe.