Slashdot Mirror


Creationism Museum Opening in Kentucky

Noel Linback writes "A new creationism-espousing museum is opening in the state of Kentucky. According to a New York Times article the museum depicts humans and dinosaurs living together in traditional 'diorama' style exhibit. 'Whether you are willing to grant the premises of this museum almost becomes irrelevant as you are drawn into its mixture of spectacle and narrative. Its 60,000 square feet of exhibits are often stunningly designed by Patrick Marsh, who, like the entire museum staff, declares adherence to the ministry's views; he evidently also knows the lure of secular sensations, since he designed the Jaws and King Kong attractions at Universal Studios in Florida. For the skeptic the wonder is at a strange universe shaped by elaborate arguments, strong convictions and intermittent invocations of scientific principle. For the believer, it seems, this museum provides a kind of relief: Finally the world is being shown as it really is, without the distortions of secularism and natural selection. '"

3 of 1,166 comments (clear)

  1. Heading off at the pass by conigs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just remember: not everyone who partakes in Christianity (big C or little c) believes the world was created 4,000 years ago. Some of us actually believe in evolution. (Well, us non-fundies anyway.)

    --
    Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
  2. Re:On the other hand, they also make great Bourbon by kennygraham · · Score: 5, Informative

    several groups (both religious and secular) will be protesting. come join us!

  3. An appeal by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm attaching this as a reply to the first post in the hopes that it will be seen by people entering the thread and thus head off some inevitable posts. Creationists, this is addressed to you.

    Here goes:

    The word "theory" is not synonymous with the word "hypothesis" in science.

    Please, please try to remember this when you instinctively want to cry "but it's only a theory!" when talking about evolutionary theory. As has doubtless been explained to you ad nauseum by the scientifically-inclined, Theory is a designator that must be earned and requires a reasonable body of supporting evidence. So while indeed the colloquial allows the use of "I have a theory" to mean a hypothesis, this is not correct in science.

    Make whatever other arguments you will, but please stop making this elementary mistake. cheers.

    --
    P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.