Slashdot Mirror


How the Pentagon Got Its Shape

Pcol writes "The Washington Post is running a story on the design process for the Pentagon building and why it ended up with its unusual shape. In July 1941 with World War II looming, a small group of army officers met to consider a secret plan to provide a permanent home for War Department headquarters containing 4 million square feet of office space and housing 40,000 people. The building that Brig. Gen. Brehon Burke Somervell, head of the Army's Construction Division, wanted to build was too large to fit within the confines of Washington DC and would have to be located across the Potomac River in Arlington. "We want 500,000 square feet ready in six months, and the whole thing ready in a year," the general said adding that he wanted a design on his desk by Monday morning. The easiest solution, a tall building, was out because of pre-war restrictions on steel usage and the desire not to ruin Washington's skyline. The tract selected had a asymmetrical pentagon shape bound on five sides by roads or other divisions so the building was designed to conform to the tract of land. Then with objections that the new building would block views from Arlington National Cemetery, the location was moved almost one-half mile south. The building would no longer be constructed on the five-sided Arlington Farm site yet the team continued with plans for a pentagon at the new location. In the rush to complete the project, there was simply no time to change the design."

12 of 473 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Pentagon or Pentagram? by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Historical trivia on how one of the most known military buildings in the world came to be, I'd say. If they thought the Pentagon was built that way to fit the enormous pentagram in the basement and that the US military is run by devil worshippers, they'd simply do so. Right up there with the flat earth society and those that believe the moon landing was a hoax. Both of which should be put on a one-way rocket to crash into the moon's surface, HHGTTG style so they'd hopefully realize their error along the way, but that's a different story.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  2. Re:Permanent home? by drsquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry but this isn't the 2nd century BC where all you needed to go to war was to pick up a spear and put a helmet on. Amateur 'pickup' armies don't work, and will be easily destroyed by a full-time professional army.

  3. Re:How the Pentagon Got Its Shape by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next up - "what part of George's anatomy inspired the Washington Monument".

  4. the names of the chief alternative designs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..."Rectangle", "Quadrilateral", and "Square", tested poorly in focus groups.

  5. Re:Pentagon or Pentagram? by bobo+mahoney · · Score: 5, Funny

    wow an anti-conspiracy theory guy on Slashdot? I didn't think you guys existed.

    --
    Bobo Mahoney
  6. When the bureaucracy worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WW2 was a special time in the history of the public service. Projects were approved and built at a pace that embarrasses us today. Sure, the military had a bureaucracy but there was a war to be won. Everyone focused on being effective. Petty bureaucrats with petty bureaucratic concerns were swept aside.

    The lessons were learned in WW1. When that war started, the British officer corps was incompetent. They were in charge of the empire's troops and there were massacres of Canadian, Australian, Newfoundland etc. troops. The colonies weren't about to put up with that. In fact there is a story that the Canadian prime minister hauled the British prime minister out of his chair by his lapels and made it very clear that, if there was another such massacre, the Canadians were going home. The incompetent British officers were replaced by competent colonials. By the time the Americans arrived, they had some very good models of military efficiency to copy. (You could also make the argument that they weren't that stupid in the first place.) In any event, when WW2 came along, the lessons learned in WW1 were still living memory.

    Sadly, given enough peace time, the fat bloated bureaucracy rears its ugly head again. The meritocracy is suppressed. If we had to build another Pentagon today, it would cost too much and take too long, and some company close to certain politicians would get rich. In fact, looking at the corruption and waste of money in Iraq, I'm feeling very depressed.

  7. Re:Permanent home? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the full-time professional army was allowed to fight like their enemies in Iraq do, then the situation there would be different.

    If we were actually fighting a War of Conquest, as people seem to insist that we are, then the situation would be different. We aren't fighting a War of Conquest though. We are fighting some sort of wet-dream nation-building exercise created by the Neo-Cons that assumed we'd be welcomed as liberators and only planned on being there for six months or so after the war. We are fighting Dubya's war because he had to one-up his Dad and go to Baghdad.

    Irregular/guerrilla warfare only works if you assume that the occupying power has to follow certain conventions and rules of war that you (as the guerrilla) don't. If the occupying power is free from any political constraints then the guerrillas are screwed. Guerrilla warfare never worked against Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia.

    It also never really worked against the early Romans. They were only too happy to slaughter entire villages. Kill every male of military age and sell the women and children into slavery. Yeah, it's not pretty, but by the rules of the day it worked quite well. Lay down your arms and you can join the empire, resist us and we will crush you utterly and enslave any survivors.

    People who accuse the United States of trying to "conquer" Iraq or Afghanistan don't know what true conquest is.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  8. Re:Pentagon or Pentagram? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny
    I blame the freemasons.

    I totally agree. Like all open source ventures, the quality just isn't there. The proprietary masons would have done it properly.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  9. Screw the pentagon by antiaktiv · · Score: 5, Funny

    Screw the pentagon, i want to know how this military building got its shape.

  10. Re:Principia Discordia reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    > The Illuminatus Trilogy is a humorous work of fiction. It doesn't try to explain anything. It is a comedy novel, like Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, except about conspiracies instead of space-travel. It finds an audience in the post-LSD era, because it is still funny.

    The Illuminatus Trilogy is a humorous work of non-fiction. It successfully tries to explain everything. It is a comedy novel, like Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, except about conspiracies instead of space-travel. It finds an audience in the post-LSD era, because it is still relevant.

    ("Both of the preceding statements are true. Both of the preceding statements are false. Both of the preceding statements are irrelevant.")

    The passages on Celine's Laws are particularly relevant today. You don't need a conspiracy to explain Gulf War II. You just need Saddam's lieutenants swearing up and down that the WMD projects are going well -- because they know they'll be shot if they tell the truth. Nor do you need a conspiracy on the American side -- you just need a bunch of paranoids listening in on the conversations between Saddam and his lieutenants.

    Saddam: "How are my nukes?"
    Lieutenant: "What nukes?"
    Saddam: *BANG*
    Lieutenant #2: "Gulp... umm, actually, they're going very well, sir!"
    Lieutenant #3: "Yes, it's going very well!"

    America: "What's Saddam up to?"
    Spies: "Well, every one of his lieutenants say his nukes are almost ready, sir!"
    America: "Launch the missiles!"

    Some folks might even find the following little snippet of dialogue to be relevant.

    "Their grip on Washington is still pretty precarious. They've been able to socialize the economy. But if they showed their hand now and went totalitarian all the way, there would be a revolution. Middle-readers would rise up with right-wingers, and left-libertarians, and the Illuminati aren't powerful enough to withstand that kind of massive revolution. But they can rule by fraud, and by fraud eventually acquire access to the tools they need to finish the job of killing off the Constitution."

    "What sort of tools?"

    "More stringent security measures. Universal electronic surveillance. No-knock laws. Stop and frisk laws. Government inspection of first-class mail. Automatic fingerprinting, photographing, blood tests, and urinalysis of any person arrested before he is charged with a crime. A law making it unlawful to resist even unlawful arrest. Laws establishing detention camps for potential subversives. Gun control laws. Restrictions on travel. The assassinations, you see, establish the need for such laws in the public mind. Instead of realizing that there is a conspiracy, conducted by a handful of men, the people reason--or are manipulated into reasoning--that the entire populace must have its freedom restricted in order to protect the leaders. The people agree that they themselves can't be trusted."

    Not bad for the 1970s.

    It's not true unless it makes you laugh.

    But then, to bring us back on topic, my first thought on 9/11 was to wonder if he got out of the Pentagon. Unfortunately, it looks like he did.

  11. Re:WWII looming? by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, America's lateness in WW-II used to always bother me.

    Then I realized -- the new "pro-active" America bothers me a LOT MORE.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  12. Re:bad shape for aerial attack by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A pilot would easily find it even without a map.

    Uh, yeah. I think that actually happened. Heard about it on the news or something.