Slashdot Mirror


Google Buys Anti-Malware Security Startup

J Tomas writes "Google has quietly made its first anti-malware acquisition, snapping up GreenBorder Technologies, a venture-backed company that sells browser virtualization security software. GreenBorder's software creates a DMZ (demilitarized zone) between the Windows desktop and programs downloaded from Web pages or opened from e-mail messages in Microsoft Outlook. The early speculation is that Google will add the sandbox technology to the Google Toolbar or release a rebranded version as a standalone download."

13 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Google is the new Microsoft, etc. etc. by athloi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...proving that corporations aren't evil, but trying to stay on top when you're top dog might corrupt absolutely. This would not have happened in "Lord of the Rings."

    I refuse to demonize corporations, because I know that people run them and do the best they can with an often paradoxical set of goals. I remember when one boss I worked for sold his company to a larger technological concern, and suddenly all the rules changed. Image became more important than reality. We did everything we could to inflate figures. And the guy who once spent hours thinking about "the next cool thing we'd all like to use" stayed up late looking over spreadsheets, metrics, indicators and other spaced-out crap that has no relevance to reality.

    We might call this time "the devirginization of Google," as they are inducted to the weird malevolent world of corporate politics as the top dog in the Darwinian internet struggle for virtual world domination.

    1. Re:Google is the new Microsoft, etc. etc. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Corporations aren't evil in the same way that sharks aren't evil. They're just doing what comes naturally. Sharks eat furry little sea lions; corporations make money. If either stopped doing what came naturally, they'd die.

      The key is to harness the corporation in such a way that it improves the lives of individuals without running roughshod over society. And that is the point of regulation. Well, that *should be* the point of regulation.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  2. Great ... :-S by SplatMan_DK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great!

    Yet another piece of software that interferes with my network layer, slows my PC, and eats half my CPU cycles just to keep malware from infecting my machine.

    When will we see a REAL solution to these problems, and stop implementing obscure security work-arounds that eat more resources than the applications themselves? Anyone?

    When more than 50% of the CPU cycles in my PC go to security software (Antivirus, Antiphising, Antispyware, Antiadware, Antifraud, heuristics scanning, SPAM filter, personal firewall, strange DMZ browser-thingeys) during the display of a simple HTML page in a browser i would say that our current approach is broken. Totally.

    I need an Anti-security-bloatware product. And fast!

    --
    My security clearance is so high I have to kill myself if I remember I have it...
    1. Re:Great ... :-S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A fantastic solution exists -- it's called "not using Microsoft products".

    2. Re:Great ... :-S by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      When will we see a REAL solution to these problems, and stop implementing obscure security work-arounds that eat more resources than the applications themselves? Anyone?

      You would have to ask Microsoft that. These bandaids fix a lot of MS' screwups. Or you could switch operating systems and use Windows only when necessary (games, etc.)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Great ... :-S by grub · · Score: 3, Insightful


      It's still pretty lame though...

      Yeah, absolutely. However Mom & Pop will still run down to BestBuy and buy a new "Norton IntraTubes MegaDefender 2008 Plus" for $69.99 instead of learning something new and refreshing. It's that kind of inertia that keeps a lot of the clowns in greasepaint and goofy wigs.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Great ... :-S by apathy+maybe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know, it is just an added bonus of using a more secure browser (because of less functionality) with a more secure OS.

      As I said, you have the choice of security or functionality, and in many cases you can't even have either (the scenario of having all the anti-malware products eat up your CPU time, but still doing a crappy job).

      If you want real security, you unplug your computer from the network and remove all other forms of accessing it (including the keyboard). It just depends on what you are willing to put up with.

      Of course, it is perfectly possible to have a functioning MS Windows PC connected to the Internet and even have a decent browser and have no worries. You just need to have security culture and a firewall the rejects all connections from outside (except those related to web browsing, so that would be everything except port 80, and maybe whatever port FTP is on).

      A security culture is the most important thing, and comes from not randomly downloading and installing everything, deleting spam, not opening executable attachments in emails (including in some cases such things as Word Documents!),or at least verifying that the person who sent them to you, really did.

      My mother has managed to only (I think) get one virus (or worm, I'm not sure what it was actually) for years. Yet she runs MS Windows XP (SP1 I think). She has a firewall (outdated ZoneAlarm free I think), and she doesn't use IE (rather Mozilla, again outdated). No worries, because she practices security culture (to the best of her ignorant ability). She has an anti-virus, except because the signatures take so long to download (only slow dial up, no broadband in the country) it doesn't get updated so often. No worries though, because she doesn't run random stuff, doesn't go to random websites and doesn't use IE.

      Security culture will get you everywhere.

      (Also important if you are an anti-state activist. Got to watch out for them police...)

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    5. Re:Great ... :-S by bvankuik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't need any of it. Just work with a user account (not administrator/root), use firefox, thunderbird and don't install all that crapware.

    6. Re:Great ... :-S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A few years ago I bought a mac.

      Just this weekend, and largely due to my previous purchase, my dad decided to buy two macs to deal with his frustration.

      None of my immediate family uses MS now. Time to work on my aunts and uncles and friends.

      Of course, I also surf alot on my linux box too, without the bloat.

      I wonder what cpu % I spend on the protections. It isnt near 50%.

      Make the switch. MS will be plagued by this for a long time to come. Switch now before you go Vista, imho.

    7. Re:Great ... :-S by SplatMan_DK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually they don't. Thats half of the problem. They expect me to come fix things when they stop working - but spend 69.99$ on a security app that really "does nothing" as far as they are concerned? Never!

      So to make matters worse, *I* am the one going down to BestBuy to pick up the latest Trend Micro Take-A-Pill PCCillin (Superinfused edition) because I get tired of saving their machine from the software pests they collect online... :-S

      --
      My security clearance is so high I have to kill myself if I remember I have it...
  3. Google... by Mockylock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now, if only they would filter out the sites that CAUSE the malware and spyware. Not only that, but so many garbage/search sites come up when you search for simple things like drug names and such. You would think they could block out other automated crawlers that clog up bandwidth as well.

    --
    "Please, shut up. Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid, you speak again." -Archie Bunker.
  4. Re:Reap the whirlwind, MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There IS a way to "sandbox" IE, and iirc, it even works on IE7:

    http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=9654&off set=15&rows=30

    RUNNING IE in a "runas limited user class" sandbox effect:

    "It is actually possible to run IE securely: just create a throwaway restricted user account for IE use alone. The restricted account user can't install software and can't access files of other users, so even if IE autoexecutes any nastiness, it can't do any damage.

    Of course, it's a hassle to log in as a different user just to browse the web. So we'd want to use "runas" to run just IE as a different user.

    Unfortunately, MS has made running IE as a different user a little harder than necessary. Rightclicking and using "Run as" doesn't seem to work. What did work for me was the following.

    Say the limited account is called "IEuser". Then create a shortcut to "runas /user:IEuser cmd". on your desktop. Double-clicking this will open a command prompt that runs as IEuser. Now you can manually start IE with "start iexplore". Or create a batchfile c:windowsie.bat that just contains the line "start iexplore" and you can start IE by just typing "ie". Remove all shortcuts to IE from you normal desktop and only run it from the restricted account. This way you can use IE without worry about any IE exploits"

    APK

  5. Re:I guess a newb submitted this by empaler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I bet we've all read /. summaries with abbreviations that we've wondered about. The summary just courteously saved those people a lookup, even if just to brush up.