Team Discovers "Throttle" For Solar Wind
ScienceDaily is reporting that a team of scientists have discovered that Helium may act as a "throttle" for the solar wind. The team hopes that this insight will provide them a better look inside the dynamics of space weather. "Because helium nearly vanishes from the solar wind at its minimum speed, the researchers believe helium might somehow set the minimum speed. Helium is not accelerated efficiently by any process thought to be propelling the solar wind. Instead, it has to be dragged along by the hydrogen: Solar wind hydrogen atoms exert a small electric field that drags the helium out along with it, according to the team."
I wonder *how* one measures anything going that slow considering there isn't something *tangible* to watch and measure... I wish the article could have explained this as I am now lost wondering... Which is faster, a slug, three toed sloth, helium or plasma...
Infiltrated dot Net
Anyone else feel like releasing a few million helium balloons right above Redmond, Washington, right about now? ;)
My blog
Could this be used on long range satellites?
Alpha quadrant : Freezio!
Beta quadrant : Freezio!
Gamma quadrant : Freezio!
Delta quadrant : Freezio!
Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
What truth?
There is no dupe
helium is heavier than hydrogen snd it requires a higher voltage potential to leave the sun's gravity well- in the case of solar wind the concentration of helium is actually lower than in the sun its self [4% vs 25%] the hydrogen has a better chance of escaping and at higher energies helium levels increase.
Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
So, helium is the brake and hydrogen is the gas pedal. Who's driving?
"All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
it's a plasma. without electrons, it's a positive ion.
The Science Daily article gets stuff a bit wrong. The hydrogen mentioned is not hydrogen it's protons (hydrogen without the electron), which are accelareted by the Suns magnetic field. Helium, being a neutral atom, is much less affected by the magnetic field and it moves much slower than the charged protons. Now, charged particles have a very high probability of colliding with a neutral atom (much highr than the neutral atom has), so protons will keep colliding with helium which will slow them down. The analogy is the bumper cars, except helium is a bumper 18-wheeler. So basically, the speed of fast protons will be reduced to the speed of the slow helium atoms by all these collisions. Why is this making the /. is beyond me, not the sort of sensationalist "we're all doomed" or "we're going to be OK" stuff.
This is not neutral hydrogen therefore it is highly affected by the electric field. This plasma has come from the sun which is way to hot for molecules or neutral atoms for that matter. The article does make good sense.
Ok, I think everyone is kinda missing what the question and answer are here...
/quote
/quote
The question is why in the name of the sweet baby Jeebus does the solar wind have a minimum speed of about 161 miles/sec. It sounds like, according to the article that the ammount of helium asomatotically approaches 0 as the speed slows to 161 miles/sec.
So the question becomes:
1) why must helium be present?
2) why is there a relationship since nothing that promotes the solar wind is thought to have an effect on the air speed of an unladen plasma of helium?
QTF:
Because helium nearly vanishes from the solar wind at its minimum speed, the researchers believe helium might somehow set the minimum speed. Helium is not accelerated efficiently by any process thought to be propelling the solar wind. Instead, it has to be dragged along by the hydrogen: Solar wind hydrogen atoms exert a small electric field that drags the helium out along with it, according to the team.
Basically, they don't have a frigg'n clue, but they figured out how the helium might be present.
It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
I have to agree with this sentiment. The article seems to have been targeted at a fifth grade reading level (or below) and was quite painful to read. It isn't Science Daily's fault, however, as it appears the article was not an "adaptation" but rather a blatant reprint of the original press release. Oh, silly me, I forgot one minor detail: Adaptations are little more than a copy and paste away!
The WIND-SWE group appears to have links to some of the papers they have presented. I'm not sure of the relevancy but it might make for a worthwhile read to curious minds.
He who has no
By the way, the lead researcher happens to be one of the guys reappearing yearly on slashdot as the students who built a breeder reactor for the University of Chicago Scavenger Hunt.