Slashdot Mirror


Jobs and Gates Chat Amicably

circletimessquare writes "As noted, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs met at the D conference yesterday. AllThingsD has video of the entire convivial and historic meeting — check the highlights clip. When a reporter asked if their rivalry was overblown, Jobs offered up this joke: 'We've kept our marriage secret for over a decade' — to an apparently flummoxed Gates. Other tidbits: 'His mother loves him!' said Gates about PC Guy in the famous series of commercials. 'And we love them because they're all customers!' said Jobs about Microsoft employees working on Zune who use the iPod. Read more about the event, which also covered a lot of serious ground, such as Apple's iPhone, at CNN and the Times Online."

50 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Gatres/Jobs marriage by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    We've kept our marriage secret for over a decade


    Well, they fight like an old married couple anyway... ;)
  2. What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lesson: sputtering halfwitted rage is for idiot fanboys. The people who actually make things base their self-esteem on what they accomplish, not on how insanely they hate someone else.

    1. Re:What did you expect? by Applekid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I completely agree.

      I think some were expecting fire, wrestling, and a Mortal Kombat style finish. It's not the job of these head honchos (even though Gates isn't really chair anymore) to bash the other guy. Especially not in public.

      They leave that for the marketing folks.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lesson: sputtering halfwitted rage is for /. posters.

      Fixed!

    3. Re:What did you expect? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lesson: sputtering halfwitted rage is for idiot fanboys. The people who actually make things base their self-esteem on what they accomplish, not on how insanely they hate someone else.

      On the contrary, there are many feuds between high-level execs I could name, some of whom worked together, some of whom were rivals. Some of those feuds get to the rage level. The difference is the savvy ones realize that they can't show it in public, and maintain a calm, even witty demeanor.

      That observation has no bearing on this particular pair of executives, however.

    4. Re:What did you expect? by jcr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The people who actually make things base their self-esteem on what they accomplish, not on how insanely they hate someone else.

      And that's why Microsoft's shareholders really need to kick Ballmer to the curb.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:What did you expect? by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Lesson: sputtering halfwitted rage is for idiot fanboys. The people who actually make things base their self-esteem on what they accomplish, not on how insanely they hate someone else.

      I wonder. Do you really think the movers and shakers of industry are really any more well-balanced and secure than the rest of us? Personally, I doubt it. For one, they have a lot more stress to deal with and blow off. For another, these are extremely driven, focused people. When you're hellbent on becoming the #1 OS in the world, making the #1 MP3 player, or the fact that your company's market value went down a billion dollars in the past 24 hours, well, all those other, minor side issues- like how you treat your fellow human beings- tend to get forgotten. Last, they are in positions of power, surrounded constantly by people who are afraid to call them on their bullshit. So they are free to be arrogant jerks all they want and rarely if ever get called on it. Very few people, I think, manage to resist being surrounded by sycophants and flatterers without coming away with inflated egos and turning into a jerk, or at least, more of a jerk than they otherwise would have been. I suspect that your average CEO deals with money, power, and success no better than your average Hollywood star, which is to say, not all that well.

      Sure, here they behaved themselves: they were in public, after all, and knew that people would watch for any hint of animosity. The real question is what happens when these guys are off-camera. Then do we get chair-throwing tirades where they threaten to "F-ing kill" the other guy? To build on the marriage analogy, Steve and Gates may be like a married couple that behave themselves in public and go home and have their vicious, drunken arguments in private. Personally, I think Steve Jobs comes across as an arrogant jerk in public (and I'm speaking as a Mac fanboy who likes what he's done with the company) so I can't imagine that the uncensored, private jobs is any nicer.

    6. Re:What did you expect? by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think some were expecting fire, wrestling, and a Mortal Kombat style finish. It's not the job of these head honchos (even though Gates isn't really chair anymore) to bash the other guy. Especially not in public.
      . They have been spoiled by Linus, RMS, and Theo de Rath.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:What did you expect? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The only problem with Microsoft is they just have no taste. They have absolutely no taste. And I don't mean that in a small way, I mean that in a big way, in the sense that they don't think of original ideas, and they don't bring much culture into their products."

      "I wish developing great products was as easy as writing a check...if so, then Microsoft would have great products."

      "I wish him [Bill Gates] the best, I really do. I just think he and Microsoft are a bit narrow. He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once or gone off to an ashram when he was younger."

      Nothing petty and childish about Steve Jobs. No Siree.

    8. Re:What did you expect? by h2g2bob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lesson: sputtering halfwitted rage is for Steve Balmer.

      Fixed!

    9. Re:What did you expect? by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's funny you should mention this, since Gates responded to a question by saying that what he most wished he had was Jobs' sense of taste. The crowd laughed (obviously remembering that quote), but Gates told them he wasn't joking, and went on to describe Jobs' sense of product design as "magical". Basically, he admitted something we've all known for many years: Microsoft is not as good as Apple is at making cool user interfaces.

      That was pretty big of Gates. He went up in my estimation for that.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    10. Re:What did you expect? by Khuffie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. What he admitted was that he was not as good as Jobs at making cool user interfaces. There's a slight difference there.

    11. Re:What did you expect? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but that's the point. Hating is a distraction from the goal. For fanboys, ostentatiously deranged hatred *is* the goal.

      Ah, but that's *my* point. It's not that they don't hate; it's that the smart ones don't show it. Although I agree with you on the latter point; for the maladjusted it seems all they need is an outlet for their general rage.

  3. *Brain explode* by mattgreen · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know what to think now! Choosing an operating system is a very serious matter of the highest concern, indeed, a matter of life or death. And to think that these two people have the gall to be civil to each other? They are making a complete mockery of everything we hold dear here! I cannot stand by and let myself watch in an idle manner while they trivialize one of the most epic battles by their 'jokes' and 'conversation'. It is tantamount to Yoda hanging out with Darth Vader! The only explanation is that Jobs has sold out to the dark side!

    1. Re:*Brain explode* by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny
      Choosing an operating system is a very serious matter of the highest concern,

      Yeah, it's the biggest thing since Betamax versus VHS -- otherwise known as Better versus Cheaper.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    2. Re:*Brain explode* by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better in what sense? Better in the sense that you couldn't fit most movies on 1 tape, so you had to switch tapes halfway through, or better in the sense that there was only one manufacturer of the devices to play the tapes, so you had to pay more for them. Or better in the sense that the people in control of the technology tried to control which types of films got distributed using that technology.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:*Brain explode* by svendsen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better in the sense that any person who buys something that later turns out to be crap/dies/whatever has to justify it to death why it is better and why the market was wrong.

      :-)

    4. Re:*Brain explode* by El_Smack · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It is tantamount to Yoda hanging out with Darth Vader! The only explanation is that Jobs has sold out to the dark side!"
      Apple is actually creating the dark side. Remember? It started out as a republic. Everyone votes; do what you like; run your planet however you like; we all prosper. Like a big hippie commune. But then it got big. Trade groups sprung up, deals got made and broken. Whispers in back rooms. Greed, ego, power. Even now, the power hungry are positioning to fill Jobs' seat. Dark times await.

      --


      There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  4. I'm just impressed they found a venue big enough by bad_fx · · Score: 3, Funny

    To fit those egos in... :p

  5. While drinking water.... by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    'And we love them because they're all customers!' said Jobs -- as Gates drank a glass of water....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  6. Other topics not broached by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

    While the talks were described by Jobs as being "positive", rumor has it that neither side brought up hot topics such as Microsoft's continued use of centrifuges for uranium enrichment or Apple's purported covert operations in Redmond.

  7. Behind the scenes by packetmon · · Score: 4, Funny

    As captured by planted Microphones...

    Jobs dressing room:
    Jobs in the background squeezing the head off a Bill Gates bobblehead doll... "As a kid I broke more windows than an urban problemed child on ritalin in an abandoned factory full of windows and an endless supply of rocks. I hate you"

    Gates dressing room:
    "Who thought it would be funny to send me Apple pie? I want him DEAD! I want his family DEAD! I want his house burned to the GROUND! I wanna go there in the middle of the night and I wanna PISS ON HIS ASHES!
    (Untouchables movie quote)

  8. Conspiracy... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone ever got the sinking feeling that Gates and Jobs have been pulling the wool over our eyes with their "rivalry" for 30 years? Blatant cooperation on such a scale would have been even MORE monopolistic than Microsoft is now, and such competition has always been good press. I say they've had a weekly phone conversation since their supposed "split." Pirates of Silicon Valley, indeed.

    Am I making sense, or is this just pure flamebait?

  9. They don't hate each other by Bullfish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fanbois might wish they did but they don't. MS actually has actually helped Apple more than once. They even gave them a much needed cash infusion at one point in the 90's. And back in 83, at a meeting of my local apple users group, there was a MS shill talking up the apple and the software ms was making for it. Any bad blood is more between the basement dwellers of the world than these two. They have both contributed to the other being very rich. There are other examples, but the apple/ms rivalry is more of a media/fanboi concoction

    1. Re:They don't hate each other by Mordaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They even gave them a much needed cash infusion at one point in the 90's.

      Right, in a history of dirty dealing, Microsoft just decided to give Apple a friendly loan! ;) That cash injection wasn't for Apple's benefit. I'd wager on that move having been an attempt to look better in the face of the pending anti-trust case. Although, I wouldn't be surprised if it were something to do with the deals MS Signed with Apple in 1986 (GUI) and 1991(truetype.)

      Gates and Jobs may not hate each other, but that doesn't make MS and Apple buddies.

    2. Re:They don't hate each other by swillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with all but the "much-needed cash infusion". MS made a tiny investment in Apple, partly as a PR gambit, but mostly as part of a settlement of a couple of lawsuits Apple had filed against MS. Apple didn't need the money -- MS only gave Apple $150M, and Apple had over $1B cash on hand -- but was certainly happy to take it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:They don't hate each other by dmarcoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      bullshit.
      the "much needed cash infusion" of $150 mil of non voting stock was more symbolic than anything. Apple had over $4 Billion in cash at the time

    4. Re:They don't hate each other by vought · · Score: 5, Interesting

      MS actually has actually helped Apple more than once. They even gave them a much needed cash infusion at one point in the 90's.

      I'm very tired of hearing this - because it has no basis in reality.

      In 1997, Microsoft invested $150 million in Apple's non-voting stock. They sold this stock earlier this decade. Apple did not need cash at the time - the company had over $4 billion in the bank, but was losing money each quarter. They didn't need $150 million in stock sales to keep them afloat, and such a stock sale certainly couldn't be characterized as a "much needed cash infusion". It was a vote of confidence in Apple by Microsoft - a PR move and little more.

      The most important announcement made on the same day was that Microsoft would continue developing Microsoft Office for the Mac. This announcement was important to Apple's future in a way that a simple $150 million stock sale simply couldn't be - it sent the message to customers that the key to productivity software compatibility for Mac users would remain updated and supported.

      The most important announcement not made that day was that Apple and Microsoft settled a rather serious suit over Canyon Software's appropriation of Apple's QuickTime code, which was used by Microsoft and shipped in Windows Media Player. The suit could have been worth quite a bit more than $150 million - and would have led to a protracted court battle and some very embarrassing revelations about Microsoft's business practices during the government's antitrust investigation of the software giant.

      PLEASE stop repeating the canard about Microsoft "giving" Apple a cash infusion. It's not true, and never was.

    5. Re:They don't hate each other by vought · · Score: 3, Informative

      David Boies found the evidence that the suit was settled during his work on the antitrust suit for the government.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/1998/10/29/microsoft_ paid_apple_150m/

  10. Re:Bill Gates by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A little off topic...

    I saw a news video online with Bill Gates regarding that new touch table thingy last night.

    During the interview, he laid his credit card down on the table. It got me to thinking, what kind of credit limit do you think Bill Gates' credit cards have? (Now I know the obvious answer is that he could buy the credit card company).

    The interviewer asked him how he tipped, and Gates' response was "I like to meet expectations..." :P Oh, great. This gives me visions of a CARNIVORE system firing up to index and weight the waiter's internet postings, tip weighted according to what the waiter thinks of Gates. "Ah, MScarnivore says that you think I'm a skinflint bastard. As you expect, so shall you not receive."

    I'm only halfway joking here. Computerized information systems are the wet dreams of the secret police. The classic problem in intel is that data is gathered at a rate far greater than it can be classified, organized, and analyzed. That's why we'll hear about things like "We had the intel pinning him to the premeditated crime three days before he did it....but we only found out two weeks after it went down." Computers are just like guns, dangerous depending on who has them. Mod me -1 paranoid.
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  11. Skip the highlight reel by Nymz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The interview is not as fanboy biased as the /. summary implies. Watching the entire interview is worth it, and entertaining, and you'll be able to see why these two are still such great leaders.

  12. Re:Old Buddies by schiefaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if you call a $150 million investment in a company that has $4 billion in cash reserves "bailing out". I would consider it a darn good investment considering what the stock has done since then.

    --
    Angleyne: You can't bend that girder - it's unbendable! Bender: Well I don't know anything about lifting, so that ju
  13. Mac vs PC ad by objekt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Weren't you hoping you'd see something like this?
    http://i17.tinypic.com/52ax05t.jpg

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  14. Amicably? by Anarchysoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Respectfully perhaps, but I didn't perceive any genuine warmth between the two. Their body language clearly indicated that they were uncomfortable, especially Bill Gates. It also seemed like there was a lot of unspoken (or merely hinted at) anger from Steve Jobs towards Gates and, given the history of the two companies, I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case. They were both nervous, but Gates seemed scared and embarrassed at several points. This whole interview would make an excellent study for a psychology or communications student. ;)

    1. Re:Amicably? by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think Gates is just socially awkward. Have you ever seen him look comfortable in public?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Amicably? by Anarchysoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know, remember when Gates was on Jon Stewart, and the moment the interview was over he sprang up out of his chair and booked the hell out of there? Totally unlike every other interviewee on the history of the show? You and the parent poster are right about his social akwardness, though a review of the video I think reveals a much more comfortable Bill Gates. He does a lot of public speaking and, while not (IMO) charismatic, can communicate clearly. He looked much more like he was sweating bullets in the interview with Steve Jobs and this wouldn't be very surprising given the history of those two.
  15. Winston Churchill Said it Best by germansausage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.

  16. Why would they care? by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do they really dislike each other? Really? Maybe they used to, back when business was shaky and they were only multi millionaires. But now? They both won.
    Both Apple and MS could go bankrupt tomorrow and Gates/Jobs would still have more money that they could ever spend. It's easy to be magnanimous when you are untouchable.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  17. Re:Bill Gates by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would he bother even using credit? Couldn't he just get a very high daily limit debit card and use that? Doesn't using credit decrease your wealth? Although I'm sure he would have enough to pay the card(s) off at the end of the month, what advantage does somebody like Gates get from using credit? Does he like collecting the Airmiles? Credit should only be used if you don't have the cash to pay for something. Unless you have some weird credit card where the interest rate is lower than what the bank pays you on savings (very unlikely), then paying on credit is always a bad choice.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  18. Re:Bill Gates by jaysones · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, he's building good credit so he can buy a house or car one day.

  19. Re:Bill Gates by Reverberant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Couldn't he just get a very high daily limit debit card and use that? Doesn't using credit decrease your wealth?

    Doesn't spending your own money also decrease your wealth?

  20. Re:I've said this many times by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The people that love Gates hate Jobs, and vice versa. Hence, their PRODUCTS may be similar but their CUSTOMERS are definately not the same people.

    riiiiight, that's why Apple has the "Switch" ads, because they aren't trying to attract Microsoft customers. Good reasoning, sparky.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Re:Bill Gates by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Credit should only be used if you don't have the cash to pay for something.

    Could you please explain why I have a credit card then? I always pay everything at the end of the month.

    Credit cards are handy because they are accepted everywhere and debit cards, well, often aren't. Credit Cards also have certain guarantees (Check your contract!). For example: sometimes you get extra warranty on an item you buy. That, plus I like the fact that once a month I get a bill and I can see where I did stupid things again. A 1000$ bill huts much more than 10 smaller 100$ withdrawals with a debit card.

    Besides, if you cannot afford something you have two real options:

    1. Don't buy it.
    2. Go to the bank and ask for a loan. (There is a thing called a "Consumer Loan" for smaller items) You will much likely get better interest rates than on your credit card.

    Option number "3", which is using your credit card for it and pay it off over an undetermined time is foolish and expensive. A credit card is for convenience, not to build up debt. Once you understand that, you're golden.

    Oh, and if you talk about those impulse buys of 50" Plasma screens, you should reconsider your buying behavior. You do not buy a 50" Plasma screen on a whim, and that means you do have the time to go to the bank to get a real loan.

  22. Neat. by sootman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The highlight clips were great. I look forward to watching the whole thing. As much as we vilify Gates, he is a bright guy and he did some good stuff once upon a time and I could listen to either of them tell stories all day. That said, Steve is far and away the better presenter.

    Note to interviewers: SHUT UP! When you ask a question and the guy is trying to answer, quit trying to get your stupid little Friends-esqu quips in. NO ONE is there to hear you speak. Quit trying to be the life of the party. Example: watch Steve TRYING to tell his story at the 5:40 mark in the highlight reel and the inane banter at around 6:15.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Neat. by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto - there were many points that carried a lot of drama, that were utterly fsked up by Mossberg and Swisher. Swisher was particularly cheesy after the admittedly over the top sentimental Beatles' reference, but screwed up what would have been better served by silence or audience reactions either of which would have been more interesting. As much as it's easy to bash professional broadcasters and interviewers, if you compare these print-geeks to someone like Leo Lapporte - I think someone like Leo would have done a better job (with a disclaimer that Mr. Lapporte falls apart around industry veterans like Woz etc). Mossberg wasn't nearly as bad as Swisher - but he had his problems as well.

      I've worked in publishing and print people can be as wonky as they come to public speaking - let alone carrying an interview. They might ask the right questions for print - but they will blow a public performance time and time again with problems in delivery, nervousness, you name it.

  23. Re:Intro song by pitdingo · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Love Will Find a Way" by the band: "Yes", album: "Big Generator"

  24. Re:Cryptic Comments by vought · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ". . . isn't it funny, a ship that leaks from the top."

    Definitively:

    This has nothing to do with Spindler's "ship with a hole in the bottom" comment. The "ship that leaks from the top" is CEOs and VPs who blab about future products to the detriment of current, shipping products while admonishing the vast majority of employees not to leak product details.

    When I joined Apple in 1995, we had to watch a security video. It schooled us about export control, "tailgating" through badged entryways, and not talking about product details with the press, friends, etc. It was silly to expect employees to keep their traps shut while they watched Diesel Spindler yak about upcoming products like the PowerBook 5300 which would have "unprecendented speed and battery life". (It didn't.)

    The ship that leaks from the top comment is simply a jibe at the days of Sculley, Spindler, and to a lesser degree, Amelio - braggadocio CEOs who represented the "old way" of doing things at Apple, and who didn't hold themselves to the same standards they expected of their employees.

      Sculley used to talk about pie-in-the-sky projects like the Knowledge Navigator, Newton, etc. well ahead of the projects actually, you know, working. Spindler was too stupid not to let stuff slip about future product direction. And Amelio talked up future products and strategies in order to keep the company relevant.

  25. Re:TFA by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I disagree. Perhaps in the highlight reel - which is the only video I didn't watch - but in the whole 1 hour 21 minute presentation, it was pretty balanced. In fact, if you watch the whole thing, Job's responses are pretty short - while Bill tended to go on a bit longer (particularly when new products/directions came up). Both of them also handed off responses and first responses to each other.

    The summary is cute. Bill's response lag seemed more in keeping with coming up with a real response to the question - although the comedic timing of said lag is obvious.

  26. Two different people by sg3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm watching the highlights on the Wall Street Journal, and it's interesting how different these two guys are. Gates is a dumpy, middle-aged guy who is slouching in his chair. He starts telling the story about how Apple paid Microsoft for a floating point version of BASIC. Jobs, who sits up straight and appears to be in fairly good shape (particularly since his cancer surgery) has to interrupt him, saying "let me tell the story." Gates is polite and lets Jobs interrupt him. However, suddenly the boring anecdote becomes interesting, since Jobs is just a better storyteller.

    In a related note, at time index 12:04, Jobs starts talking about the memory capabilities of computers back then, and how different they are today. Same theme as the Mac Plus v AMD Dual Core article today!

    On the whole, it's fascinating to see these two giants in the same interview.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  27. Re:credit card by businessnerd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Btw, Black Amexes ain't something you request. It's something you get.
    So you might say that the American Express Black card is like a "Soviet Express" card.

    In Soviet Russia, credit card applies for you!
    --
    "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson