New Review Compares MythTV to Vista MCE
Parkus writes "There's a nice review on AVS forum of MythTV (Ubuntu) and Windows Vista MCE. The author tried both back to back and explains the pluses and minuses of each system after using them for a month. Helpful if you're thinking about setting up your own home theater rig."
The more I think about it, the more the article looks like an ad for Vista. One of many M$ PR drones posting as AC insultingly froths:
All you're doing is slagging off the author and not addressing some of his very reasonable points.
I did not see many reasonable points in Vista's favor. Mostly the author dips to M$ talking points about "correctness" "experience" and other nebulous observations. There was no number of click count for common tasks, mention of digital restrictions or other ease of use issues that people really care about.
Why, exactly would someone spend hours setting up (or failing to set up) MythTV when Vista can do everything MythTV can?
Here the author almost got things right. Vista gave him more hardware trouble than MythTV did. Getting Vista to work at all is difficult for all but the most hardened fanboys who know all the details of driver downloading, register hacking, etc. That he used Vista at all is fishy, because most AV people will tell you to sick with XP and excellent third party software available on that platform. HD is almost certain to tip the balance further in Myth's favor because it too has been working for a while and you can still get hardware that is not limited by broadcast flags. Try that on anything from M$.
Yet again, Microsoft have produced a superior product which people actually WANT, and can USE.
People don't want DRM and the very purpose of digital restrictions is to keep people from doing what they want, even if the shit worked out of the box.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.