Microsoft Gives Xandros Users Patent Protection

DigDuality writes "Microsoft, shrugging off licensing moves to prevent it from repeating its controversial patent deal with Novell, has signed a set of broad collaboration agreements with Linux provider Xandros that include an intellectual property assurance under which Microsoft will provide patent covenants for Xandros customers."

Comments

Very disappointed with Xandros

[Anonymous Coward]

I wonder what else Xandros has sold out! I thought they had a good distribution. Thanks, but no thanks. I will stick with people who have integrity and honesty - Fedora and RHEL.

See also: http://www.bpmlegal.com/wselden.html.

A propoganda step with a little fish

[Bruce Perens]

For those who have never heard of Xandros (which will be a lot of you), it's a commercial distribution descended from Corel's Linux system, funded by the same VCs that funded Ximian, and derived from Debian at one point, although I don't know how much comes from there any longer. They've been around a long time, although for obvious reasons I can't believe they are very successful.

They took the money that Microsoft offered. That's really all the news there is here - that Microsoft found another foundering commercial Linux distribution willing to sign up to the patent covenant and give it publicity. The technical aspects are irrelevant, as they indeed are in the Novell deal. Xandros is a little fish without significant technology to offer. Even in the case of Novell, nobody needed Microsoft's help with virtualization - the only thing Microsoft can offer is the slight performance increment of paravirtualization for Windowsover the full virtualization that is available now.

There's not much to do about Xandros. They aren't a big player, this isn't going to make them into one. We should turn away from them as was the casewith Novell, but it seems a bit silly since most of us didn't even know they existed.

Bruce

Re:Patents?

[Cato]

Patents are involved, but they are Microsoft's not Xandros', since Xandros is quite a small company that clearly has no patents of interest - that's why it says MS is not licensing patents FROM Xandros. Another part of this article says:

"The agreement with Xandros, to be announced Monday, includes a promise by Microsoft to refrain from pursuing patent claims against users of Xandros software."

Tell Xandros what you think

[Bruce Perens]

Those of you who would like to tell Xandros what you think may do so here. You may also tell Novell here. - Bruce

Re:Tell Xandros what you think

[Bruce Perens]

I REALLY need to be able to contact you when your state, nation, whatever is considering a bill that would be harmful to Open Source software. To do that, I need to know where you are. This is much more important than the Xandros and Novell matters.

Thanks

Bruce

Re:Andreas Typaldos (CEO of Xandros) is a MORON!

[Grishnakh]

The "community" of which you speak might be good at "blackballing" but so what? That community doesn't pay the bills. It's not like you guys actually buy any distros or sign up for support contracts anyway, so you can "blackball" whomever you want. It makes no difference since distros aren't seeing any money from you anyway.

Don't be ignorant. The "community" typically has day jobs in the IT sector where they get to recommend vendors. By pissing off the community, they've bought themselves a lot of bad word-of-mouth inside companies that they seek to sell cupport contracts to.

I used to recommend SuSE whenever I had the chance. Not any more.

Lotus v. Borland

[tepples]

Other word processing Suites can claim that they are similar, but again to a lot of people, they are not the same. (Unless the software "copies" MS's navigation style. And in this case, they are liable of being sued of the content, as the copyright law today would dictate). Program menus are deemed a "method of operation" and not subject to copyright. Lotus Development v. Borland International .