Slashdot Mirror


White House Derails Attempts to End Illegal Wiretapping

P. Rivacy writes "If you recall, last month we discussed Congress's attempts to outlaw the already illegal NSA wiretaps authorized by the President. The White House is now using delaying tactics to derail the passage of that bill. Their tactic is to stall on providing documents related to the President's warrantless wiretapping program, despite requests from the Senate Intelligence Committee that is currently reviewing the proposed legislation. '"Another critical priority for congressional oversight is government wiretapping of Americans, conducted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and, illegally, under the President's warrantless wiretapping program," Senator Russ Feingold said. "When the program was finally placed within the FISA process, an opportunity arose for the Administration and the Congress to move forward, under the law. Unfortunately, the Administration has yet to demonstrate a real interest in doing so."'"

5 of 647 comments (clear)

  1. What I find astonishing is... No impeachment yet?? by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean, think about it, all Nixon did was send some spooks into the Watergate Hotel to snoop on the Democratic Convention. Suddenly he was Satan incarnate, and the whole country was on him like a cheap suit.

    Dubya and his cronies spy on EVERYBODY, brag about it, torture people to death, invade other countries for personal gain, "out" CIA agents, fire U.S. attorneys, get cozy with the commies in China, kidnap people (extraordinary rendition)...

    And nothing! Not a whimper! And the Red States think he's a Good Ole' Boy!

    Seriously, people -- WTF???

    --
    NO CARRIER
  2. Re:Legalities and such by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I made another post talking about this at greater length, but the fact is that you're right that without a court ruling we can't say with certainty that this program was illegal. As far as I'm concerned, the fact that Bush has not claimed that he has complied with the law, and rather has argued that he does not need to comply with the law because the Constitution grants him the power to ignore the 4th Ammendment when he wants to, is all I need to know to form an educated layman's opinion that the NSA program was not in compliance with the law, i.e. illegal.

    The only real question is whether the court will agree with Bush's interpretation of the Constitution. The question of whether he complied with FISA has already been answered. And somehow I doubt the Judicial branch will agree that the Judicial power of granting warrants is irrelevent to the Executive branch.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  3. Re:I predict... by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The tactic of ignoring laws and judgments that do not fit the executive agenda has worked for 6 years now

    Come, come. 6 years? Ever heard the official term Contempt of Congress? This administration is yet to have an official to be so condemned (in six years!), but the list is long, and even the previous administration is on it.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  4. Re:I predict... by bentcd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I don't know enough of domestic US politics to be any kind of final judge, the following word seems interesting in this context (emphasis is mine).

    From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
        Tyrant (...)
              1. An absolute ruler; a sovereign unrestrained by law or constitution; a usurper of sovereignty. [1913 Webster]
              2. Specifically, a monarch, or other ruler or master, who uses power to oppress his subjects; a person who exercises unlawful authority, or lawful authority in an unlawful manner; one who by taxation, injustice, or cruel punishment, or the demand of unreasonable services, imposes burdens and hardships on those under his control, which law and humanity do not authorize, or which the purposes of government do not require; a cruel master; an oppressor. "This false tyrant, this Nero." --Chaucer. [1913 Webster]

    --
    sigs are hazardous to your health
  5. Re:I predict... by jahudabudy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While there is certainly some wisdom to the idea of moving on, I hesitate in this case to espouse it. Nixon, while he didn't face charges, lost his position and faced universal condemnation. Bush, on the other hand, does not seem likely to face any real consequences from his flagrant abuses of power. If we as a nation do not call him out on his abuses in some manner, I predict more and more abuses of this nature cropping up in future administrations. Plus, as the GP indicated, a little bit of wrist-slapping might go a long way towards improving our public image abroad.

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA