Vista Not Playing Well With IPv6
netbuzz writes in to note that some early adopters of Microsoft Vista are reporting problems with Vista's implementation of IPv6. An example:"'We are seeing a number of applications that are IP-based that do not like the addressing scheme of IPv6,' says one user. 'We will send a print job to an IP-based printer, and the print job becomes corrupted. We're seeing this with Window's Vista machines. When IPv6 is installed, this happens without fail. As soon as we remove IPv6, all of our printer functions return to normal.'"
Disable this whole "internet" thing altogether. It's been full of security problems for Windows ever since someone dreamed it up.
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
"2^32 unique addresses ought to be enough for anybody."
I suspect that also IPv4 is having problems.
Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
"We recognize that not all applications and drivers were up to date by launch and that there have been some compatibility issues as a result,"
"But we also know that Windows Vista is the highest-quality, most secure and most broadly supported operating system we've ever released."
Hameroff adds that Microsoft is running an IPv6 network and "to my knowledge has not experienced these types of issues"
davecb5620@gmail.com
I think you responded to the wrong story, but you're amazingly on topic anyway.
When IPv6 is installed, this happens without fail. As soon as we remove IPv6, all of our printer functions return to normal.
;)
It fails without fail?
Slashdot Burying Stories About Slashdot Media Owned
Embrace, Extend, and Explode! :D
Microsoft's IPv6 stack is extremely secure, more so than the Linux one. It achieves this by simply not talking to anything.
How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
Standard Operating Procedure: To usurp a world standard and boost Microsoft sales:
(1) Deliver a "world standard" implementation
(2) ???
(3) Offer Microsoft-only extensions with subsequent "patch" (for efficiency of course)
(4) Developers use the extensions
(5) Standard subverted!!
(6) Profit
Implementation Notes:
step (2) may be completely omitted for already well established and widely adopted standards (e.g. C, C++)
step (2) has recently been proposed as "Break something important"