Slashdot Mirror


Liquid Lens Can Magnify at the Flick of a Switch

An anonymous reader writes "German engineers have designed the first liquid camera lens with no moving parts that provides two levels of zoom. 'Liquid lenses bend light using the curved boundary between watery and oily liquids. When the two liquids are held in the right container, the boundary between them can be made to curve in a way that focuses light simply by applying a voltage. Liquid lenses have attracted much attention because they are potentially smaller than conventional optics and cheaper to build. Samsung has already built them into some cellphones.'"

26 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Lens isn't working by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Lens isn't working by Leontes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about using these in reading glasses or goggles. People find bifocles somewhat frustrating due to the disruption to field of vision.

      I can imagine: Let me put on my glasses. Oh, they are set for concave. ::tap:: Presto, convex.

      I guess there *is* something to see.

    2. Re:Lens isn't working by 2meen · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are already products out there which use liquid lenses to provide cheap classes to people in developing countries.

      http://www.adaptive-eyecare.com/ comes to mind (link from an article in Illustrerad Vetenskap http://www.illvet.se/Crosslink.jsp?a=1218&id=7354_ 2, a swedish popular science magazine).

  2. This is old by 2.7182 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A guy did this at Bell Labs 2 years ago, and around the same time so did some French company that was going to put them in cell phones.

    1. Re:This is old by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      "German engineers have designed the first... Samsung has already built them into some cellphones.'" Bell Labs aand Samsung used a time machine. It clearly says the German engineers have just done it first. The only possible explanation for Bell Labs doing it two years ago and Samsung having already built it in to cell phones is that they went forward in time in some kind of a time machine, possibly involving a flux capacitor of some sort, and brought the technology back with them to before it was first implemented.

      That, or it's a badly phrased article.

      In related news, German scientists have designed the first "circular device for the conveying of people and objects" and the first "source for the creation of heat and light by combustion of a 'fuel'." We may mock but the USPTO will still grant them a patent on the lot of it.
    2. Re:This is old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is about liquid lenses with zoom capability, which is new.

      Samsung etc. have had liquid lenses, but they haven't been able to do zoom. The German researchers found out how to make it work.
      Hope that helps.

  3. Shake It by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I shake it before snapping a photo, do I get a really cool bubble-like effect ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Shake It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what I told your wife too, but she didn't listen....

  4. Herbert used it in Dune in 1965... by KokorHekkus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Are there any earlier mentions of liquid lenses before Dune? The article links seems to think he was firtst. Even if there is, it's still a pretty nice catch by Frank Herbert.

    Will you look at that thing! Stilgar whispered. Paul lay beside him in a slit of rock high on the shield wall rim, eye fixed to the collector of a Fremen telescope. The oil lens was focused on a starship lighter exposed by dawn in the basin below them. The tall eastern face of the ship glistened in the flat light of the sun, but the shadow side still showed yellow portholes from glowglobes of the night.
    (ref. source http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=52
    1. Re:Herbert used it in Dune in 1965... by shrikel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except in Dune, the oil was suspended in a force field, allowing perfect (and perfectly adjustable) refraction. I've long wanted a telescope like that. No more recollimating my scope every time I take it somewhere out in the boonies over a bumpy dirt road!

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    2. Re:Herbert used it in Dune in 1965... by obender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are there any earlier mentions of liquid lenses before Dune?
      In the Mysterious Island novel by Jules Verne published in 1874, Cyrus Harding lits a fire with a lens made up of two watch glass lids stuck together and filled up with water. You can read the chapter here
    3. Re:Herbert used it in Dune in 1965... by pclminion · · Score: 3, Informative

      Changing the shape of a lens doesn't adjust its refraction, it just... changes the shape of the lens. Refractivity is a property of the material, not the geometry of the lens.

    4. Re:Herbert used it in Dune in 1965... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative

      The way you've worded your post is pretty much a flat contradiction of all optics since Newton. Go look up what a lens is.

      I didn't say the shape of a lens doesn't matter. I said it doesn't alter the refractivity (and by that I mean its index of refraction). Of COURSE it alters the behavior of the lens. Refractivity is an intensive property, the geometry of the lens is an extensive property.

      Perhaps my wording wasn't as clear as it should have been. The point stands that the shape of a lens does not alter the ability of the material to refract light, it only alters the specific geometries of the refracted rays.

  5. nearly on-topic: liquid crystal focussing by c_jonescc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This immediately reminded me of a talk I saw recently by Guoqiang Li from U. of Arizona. They're using liquid crystal lenses to make glasses with variable focusing power as a function of applied voltage. You could flip a switch to be able to see near or far - so if you're near-sighted but getting to the age where reading glasses would help, you're the touch of a button away.

    Liquid zoom is quite cool too, but thought this related enough to pass on.

    fyi:
    http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/84/i15/8415lenses.htm l
    (PNAS citation in article)

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
  6. Hubble by tedgyz · · Score: 3, Funny

    It sure would have made fixing the Hubble a lot easier.

    Earth to Hubble: Adjust lens voltage to 1.537mV.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Hubble by tedgyz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except, of course, that Hubble's MIRROR had spherical abberation and this is talking about lenses.... Ok, so fill the "lens" with Mercury. Work with me here.
      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  7. Seeing double?? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative

    With better lenses we might see that this is a dup. These were reported in the media, and slashdot, a year or so back.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Seeing double?? by Nullav · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm afraid the goggles do nothing. I'm sorry.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  8. Can I take camera as carry on luggage? by Palmyst · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it contains liquid?

  9. with a technology like this... by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...could you somehow have a lens with multiple focus points? I'm thinking if you have 4 people in a picture you could focus on each of their faces with one lens and have a nice picture with everyone in focus rather than someone in the background a bit blurry.

    1. Re:with a technology like this... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhh, no need. You can do that with glass lenses. Its called depth-of-field, aperture, etc. The higher the f number, the deeper it is. Up the f, increase the depth of field, everyone is in focus (at the cost of decreased shutter speed - the f number is a ratio of 1/x of the diameter of the lens, so less light). Down the f number and you get nice portraits where only a small DOF exists and everything forward, or back, is out of focus.

    2. Re:with a technology like this... by migloo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have coaxial annular lenses, each with its own focal length, you get as many focal planes. You can thus make a multifocused picture at the cost of more blurry background.
      This has been used for bifocal soft lenses for presbyopia. Focus splitting with diffraction gratings is more commonly used now.

  10. Great for Democracy by soren100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This liquid lens technology sounds like it might really help create tiny and cheap cameras that people can use to bring more justice to the world.

    It seems that police brutality is getting so common now that they are willing to beat members of the media on camera . (The clip begins with the narrator suggesting that the protestors were "asking for it" by throwing rocks at the police, but they can't spin the footage of their own camerapeople getting beaten up.)

    What's worse, is that police now tend to focus on people with cameras , as you can also see in the above video.

    The tapes are very helpful in prosecuting police misconduct , so we neeed more people taping.

    Otherwise, the police tend to lie about the incidents , even going so far to claim in the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes in Britain that 5 different cameras watching the action were all somehow not functioning .

    In a Missouri case, a teenager was being harassed by the police at a DUI checkpoint for not telling them where he was going -- when he asked why he was being detained, he was told If you don't stop running your mouth, we're going to find a reason to lock you up tonight.

    Stuff like this happens all the time, and it will be a great day when we can start getting more of it on tape. Then the police can keep policing the citizens, but the citizens can also police the police.

    1. Re:Great for Democracy by Lorkki · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then the police can keep policing the citizens, but the citizens can also police the police.

      But if the police police police police, who will police the police police?

    2. Re:Great for Democracy by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait a second... somehow, your UID is fairly low, but your post reads like a screed directly off Reddit. What gives?

      Seriously, why turn an article on scientific discovery into a political... essay?

  11. A little earlier by UtilityFog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from here: In the Philosophical Transactions (Abridged), Volume 4, 1694-1702 pp. 97-101 + 1 plate, there is an article by Stephen Gray on "Microscopical Observations and Experiments" in which Mr. Gray explains the making of a water microscope.