Slashdot Mirror


Building a Data Center In 60 Days

miller60 writes "The facilities team at Australia's Pipe Networks is down to the wire in its bid to complete a data center in 60 days. And in an era when many major data-center projects are shrouded in secrecy, these guys are putting the entire effort online, with daily updates and photos on the company blog, a live webcam inside the facility, a countdown timer, and a punch-list of key tasks left to finish. Their goal is to complete the job by Friday morning eastern US time."

29 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. why? by thedrunkensailor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not forget the deadline and get it right? TFA says this was an exec's idea....go figure

    --
    i support the right to offend.
    1. Re:why? by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why not? It's a challenge, not a true 'deadline'. Think of it as an episode of 'Monster House' where they get to keep the tools if they get the nearly-impossible project done on time. There's -always- work to be done afterwards to finish it off, but the work is complete as far as they were contracted.

      It's not 'have a fully functional data center filled with customers.' It's only 'build it.'

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  2. Can be that great of a data center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's already Slashdotted.

  3. What's burning? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, it's just the server going up in smoke trying to serve a live webcam on Slashdot...

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:What's burning? by Tim82 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess they just need a bigger datacenter.

    2. Re:What's burning? by Thox · · Score: 4, Funny

      60 day project set back to day 0 due to fire damage.

    3. Re:What's burning? by Kerto · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last month the PIPENetworks site reported that they had installed a temporary ADSL connection for the webcam. I guess that's what it's still using. Mirrordot: http://mirrordot.org/stories/948bdf7529da4432c4216 0f0c33166c1/index.html

  4. A couple black boxes by mikaelhg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They could also just have bought a couple of Sun Black Box datacenters in a truck container.

  5. Checklist by WillRobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Get first DS3 up - check
    2. Setup webcam - check
    3. Setup webserver - check
    4. Post on slashdot and soak the DS3 - check
    5. Stress test in progress

  6. Datacenter???? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pipe's DC3 facility will be about 4,800 square feet and will be able to accommodate 170 server racks.

    I'm sorry, but 4,800 square feet and room/capacity for 170 server racks is a SERVER ROOM not a DATACENTER. I'm not trying to troll here, but this mis-use of the word datacenter gets old. The time/effort/planning/money it takes to build a datacenter is exponentially more complicated than to upfit an area to accommodate a few server racks.

    In short, sticking in a few Liebert CRACs and a little 150kva UPS does not constitute "building a datacenter".
    1. Re:Datacenter???? by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends on the community it is serving. Yeah, that is pretty pathetic compared to datacenters in major cities, but for a small city it would be perfectly fine.

      When I first started using colocation back around 96, Exodus's colo room was 6 racks. They had explosive growth and by 2001 had massive datacenters in several cities around the globe. Anyway, give them time. If they do things right, they will grow.

    2. Re:Datacenter???? by Xicarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Australia, its a datacentre. Comparative to the number of people in Au & the connections within Australia & to the rest of the world, its pretty big.

      We only have two major cables out of Australia & capacity on them to the US costs hundreds of dollars a megabit/month.

    3. Re:Datacenter???? by zevans · · Score: 3, Informative

      But with blades, 1U pizza boxes, xSeries+VMWare, LPARs, 156 and 288gb spindles, etc and the consolidation tools that all the vendors are pushing, data centres can and should be smaller than they were five years ago.

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    4. Re:Datacenter???? by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That depends on how the data center is designed. Is it the typical 300W / sq foot that typical datacenters are, or is it designed for high density servers and the additional power / cooling they need? From the size of the generator, there is no way they can go that dense.

    5. Re:Datacenter???? by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that's a little bit of wishful thinking. With the shift to online apps, the increase in streaming media, and general hunger for bandwidth/throughput (especially on corporate LAN's), I'd say that while it's true that advances in server design and virtualization has enabled the IT industry to do more with current equipment, the "market" that those products/services serve have stepped up their demand as well. The idea that datacenters are serving a static need just plainly isn't true. The demand for increased speed, storage, processing power will continue to increase at a rate reciprocal to datcenters' ability to provide it.

    6. Re:Datacenter???? by jlf278 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is a data center; and actually, you're the one guilty of mis-use as datacenter is not, in fact, a word. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_center

    7. Re:Datacenter???? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      You think a 150KVA UPS will service 170 racks?!?!? HAHAHAHAHA
      You have lost all credibility to determine what a datacenter is. A 150KVA UPS would service about 50 moderately loaded (about half empty) racks with most current equipment. 170 racks could power many midsized companies, my employer's an S&P 500 company and we have 11 racks moderately full. Wikipedia defines a datacenter as:

      A data center is a facility used for housing a large amount of electronic equipment, typically computers and communications equipment. As the name implies, a data center is usually maintained by an organization for the purpose of handling the data necessary for its operations

      Which I would say 170 racks could definitely qualify as.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  7. Make a TV reality show by yohanes · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone is doing that, why shouldn't they. Then we can fire managers that we hated the most.

  8. slashdotted an interconnect??? by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Funny

    The connection has timed out
    The server at www.pipenetworks.com is taking too long to respond.

    This does not look good!
    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  9. Sun has your covered there by invisik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Project Black Box. Just drop it off in the parking lot and plug it in.

    http://www.sun.com/emrkt/blackbox/index.jsp

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
    1. Re:Sun has your covered there by eln · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it requires "chilled water." I took a tour of this thing when it came to the local Sun campus, and it really is quite an amazing piece of engineering. Basically, you need one (small) cargo container for the data center itself, and a chiller for the water. They are able to carry the cargo container and a chiller around in a standard sized 18-wheeler. Obviously, if you were trying to take this into a disaster area, you'd need another truck or two to carry generators and fuel.

      Inside the building, they had a bunch of photoshopped pictures of these black boxes in various locations like on top of an offshore oil rig, stacked 3 high in a warehouse, and sitting on top of a skyscraper. The photoshopping was fairly good, but you could tell the photos were faked, mostly because at the time only 2 black boxes had actually been built, and one of them was outside in the parking lot.

  10. Time zones by Xiroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, the article says that they aim to be complete at 9 am EST. While that might mean an American time zone in America, in Australia that means an Australian time zone (specifically, AEST, or GMT+10, aka their local time). So they're actually aiming to finish on Thursday afternoon Eastern American time.

    Just a FYI, unless there's clarification somewhere that they were speaking of the American EST.

  11. Re:Trunk delivery timeframe by mcbridematt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Former government phone monopoly, now privatized and run by evil Americans - Telstra, basically owns 99% of fixed-line infrastructure. (As they are legislated to do so) Captial cities got TWO separate cable networks during the 1990's - one from Optus (who got the first telco license after deregulation), and the other from Telstra, who built one thinking pay TV was the bomb - it wasn't, and both cable networks have actually shrunk by some degree since.

    (Note the Optus cable network provided , and was designed to fixed line telephones from the start, which makes up the small percentage of non-Telstra fixed-line infrastuture around.)

    However, Telstra, as a monopoly, MUST provide wholesale access to the fixed-line infrastructure, as such most Australians are actually with internet providers who wholesale off Telstra, either over Telstra DSLAM's or their own. The wholesale prices of which have been ENFORCED even DICTATED by the Australian competition authorities, who among other things, refuse to tolerate American crap such as "up to XXX mbps" (Australian consumers, unlike American's, demand full line speed, no lousy contention or else), "unlimited... up to XXX GB" etc.

    A federal election issue this year is an FTTN (fibre-to-the-node) rollout to every single location within these captial cities, and an assortment of regional centers. Two proposals are in play - one from Telstra, who set wholesale prices up high because they don't want to share, and their shareholders (investment funds, small % of mon'n'dad investors) who want returns, and the "G9" - favored by many, but the pricing still sucks.

    As the majority of Australian internet traffic is to/through the US, Australian bandwidth pricing is dictated by capacity on submarine cables to the US - of which there is only one - running out of "spare" capacity fast*, despite only being turned on a decade ago. Some providers lease additional capacity via Japan, and there are three new submarine cables under planning that are attempting to remedy the bandwidth shortage, either by going to Guam to patch into Japanese capacity, or only up to Hawaii. As I've said, unlike American's, Australian users, after suffering a few years of low broadband speeds, don't tolerate US style bandwidth overselling (those that have tried failed miserably), and as such a lot of ISPs, outside Telstra (who charge almost business rates anyway), we're forced to raise prices due to the increasing use of bittorrent etc.

    * even worse the operators of the cable in question, Southern-Cross cable, aren't in a particular hurry to upgrade either.

  12. And the judges say... by VinB · · Score: 3, Funny

    This challenge would be great if they also had David Hasselhoff, Paula Abdul and John Schneider making comments after each piece of equipment installed.

  13. Call me when they've kept it running for a year by progprog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Building something in a hurry is not an accomplishment in itself. Keeping it well-maintained is the real challenge.

    Would you rather slap together a DIY PC in 15 minutes or spend time ensuring your cables are positioned to allow good airflow, etc? Same principle applies.

  14. This is a great PR piece! by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a great PR piece! Budding marketeers take note: "experiments" like this is a great way to get all kinds of free press. I hope the marketing team at Pipe gets a raise for this.

  15. He didn't want to block the tubes! by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    Duh...he just said bandwidth was expensive.

  16. More details by BDPrime · · Score: 2, Informative
    More details in this story. It definitely seems like a "we promised the customer we'd be ready by this time so you'd better get it done" type of deal. Demand for colo space is strong, but I don't know that it's so strong that Pipe Networks has to cobble together a data center as fast as it can. It could have probably doubled the time and it wouldn't have made a difference.

    The story also says the 60-day period is just the construction time period, and not the planning behind it, etc. But whatever. They created some hype and it worked. It worked too well, apparently.

  17. Context is everything. by Shadowlore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you think an article from Australia about an event IN Australia by an Australian company just might be enough context for EST to mean AEST? Sure, they should have used the correct *full* AEST but hey habit is as habit does.

    And there is no "Eastern American Time", it's EST/EDT. if you feel the need to spell it out, it is "North American", don't forget the Canadians, eh?

    Sorry mods, nothing insightful about the parent. Informative perhaps, but certainly not bearing any insight.

    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.