Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Acoustic Caller ID Patent

theodp writes "A new patent granted to Microsoft Tuesday for automatic identification of telephone callers based on voice characteristics covers constructing acoustic models for telephone callers by identifying words or subject matter commonly used by callers and capturing the acoustic properties of any utterance. Not only that, it's done 'without alerting the caller during the call that the caller is being identified,' boasts Microsoft in the patent claims."

15 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Only Innovation: Real Time versus Offline? by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dunno how useful this is. I usually just recognize the voice myself. Our wetware has some wonderful capabilities.

  2. NOW I get it... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...they're looking to patent-troll the CIA!

    Brilliant!

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  3. For real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Developers, Developers, Developers. I love this company, yeah" ** Sounds of flying chairs **

    Welcome to Microsoft patented caller Identity v1.0 beta
    Caller Identified: It's Steve... again
  4. Worse than IP broadcast TO THE WORLD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had no idea someone I might call might be able to indentify me.

  5. they think they can ... by twitter · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but it works as well as their speech recognition. Between this, face recognition and kill drones OBL will be found and exterminated early and often. I hope it's not me next.

    The programmers put in an Easter egg, just for you. Whenever Twitter says "shit" into his cell phone, the official Microsoft transcript has "M$".

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  6. Thus proving the rule by killmenow · · Score: 4, Funny

    To patent anything, follow these steps:

    1. Choose something already being done in the real world, anything really
    2. describe it with maximum verbosity
    3. add "on the Internet" at the end

    Tada! PATENT!

  7. Actually, NSA will have prior Art by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

    NSA has had real-time voice ID since before '96 and possibly longer. How MS got this patent is beyond me. Our system is soooooooo broken

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Re:Only Innovation: Real Time versus Offline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Me: "Thank you for calling, may I have your store's telephone number, area code first please?"
    Dumbass: "Yes, this is **** from the "
    Me: "Your phone number?"
    Dumbass: "Oh, it's ###-###-####" ... Yes, sometimes it is really fucking hard for the jackasses to even listen to what you ask? Like I wasn't clear about what I needed, and like you didn't know what it was either.

    Q-TIPS PEOPLE! FUCKING USE THEM!

  9. Sneakers by Loconut1389 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My name is Werner Brandes, my voice is my passport. Verify me.

  10. Without the caller's knowlege? OMG! by TheTranceFan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it's done 'without alerting the caller during the call that the caller is being identified.

    ...Sometimes...when the phone rings...
    ...I answer it...and just listen...
    ...I hear the caller's voice and identify them by their voice...
    ...Then hang up without saying anything.

    How insidious!
    What. Is. The. Difference.

    1. Re:Without the caller's knowlege? OMG! by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Funny
      Them: "Is [insert partners name here] home?"
      Me: "Oh, hi [insert partners' friends name]. I'll go get her."
      Them: "How'd you know it was me?"

      Sheesh do anything with computers or on the internet and you can patent it.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  11. Re:"Can you guarantee my safety?" by FSWKU · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The hot chick with the Uzi... can I get her phone number?"

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  12. Re:Only Innovation: Real Time versus Offline? by omeomi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that why they ask for my account number?

    Good Lord, no. They ask for your account number just to irritate you because both you and the person you're talking to know damn well you had to key in your account number just 2 minutes ago.

  13. Haven't I done this before? by gringer · · Score: 2, Funny

    A method and apparatus are provided for identifying a caller of a call from the caller to a recipient. A voice input is received from the caller, and characteristics of the voice input are applied to a plurality of acoustic models, which include a generic acoustic model and acoustic models of any previously identified callers, to obtain a plurality of respective acoustic scores. The caller is identified as one of the previously identified callers or as a new caller based on the plurality of acoustic scores. If the caller is identified as a new caller, a new acoustic model is generated for the new caller, which is specific to the new caller.
    Hrm, sounds familiar for some reason. Oh, wait... there's a phone call. I'll just go and pick it up.

    me: hello?
    caller: Hello, I'm Suzi Cheatem from Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe. I was wondering if you'd like to answer a few questions about your behaviour while using the Internet.
    I think hrm, this sounds like one of those annoying telemarketers
    me: Sorry, I'm not interested in speaking to telemarketers
    caller: It seems like you have identified me from a previously identified acoustic model. I'm afraid I'm going to have to tell Microsoft that you have stolen their idea. You can expect a bill from them within two weeks.
    <hangs up>

    Gosh, those telemarketers get stranger every time they call me.
    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  14. Re:Only Innovation: Real Time versus Offline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I dunno how useful this is. I usually just recognize the voice myself.

    Ah ha! Prior art!!