The Impossibility of Colonizing the Galaxy

OriginalArlen writes "The science fiction writer Charlie Stross has written an excellent and comprehensive explanation of why, thousands of SF books, movies, and games notwithstanding, human colonization of other star systems is impossible. Although interstellar colonization seems common-sensical to many, Charlie makes a clear-headed and unarguable case, so far as I can see, that it ain't gonna happen without a 'magic wand' or two. Nevertheless it would be interesting to see reasoned responses from the community who believe that colonization is not merely possible, but inevitable — and even, as Hawking has said, vital for the survival of the species. So, who's right — Hawking or Stross?"

Comments

I call BS

[Timesprout]

And as soon as I settle the rebellion on the outlying planets in the Sprouticus system I will be bringing my Imperial Battle Fleet to explain the situation to Mr Stross. Perhaps I will banish him to one of my penal planets, he can amuse the inmates with his so called logic.

Mac'D's

[Anonymous Coward]

$10 says we see a McDonalds on Mars before NASA arrives.

Re:Both right?

[wkitchen]

Well it may be physically impossible but also essential for our survival. Thus int he end we're really screwed.

Getting screwed in the end? What a bummer.

Re:Clarke's first law

[Afecks]

Congratulations, you just proved that interstellar travel isn't currently possible.

Re:1800's logic though that travelling100MPH=death

[Glonoinha]

The possibility of successfully navigating an asteroid field is approximately 3720 to 1.