DreamWorks Picks up Neil Gaimans' Interworld
Lisandro writes to tell us Geeks of Doom is reporting that author Neil Gaiman recently announced DreamWorks has optioned the film rights for his upcoming novel, 'Interworld'. "Gaiman said that in 1996 he began working with Michael Reaves on the idea for a story 'about a boy who finds himself in the middle of a war between two equally powerful forces, who joins a super-team consisting of versions of himself from different alternate realities to try and maintain the cosmic balance.' Soon after, the idea was pitched to DreamWorks and other studios, but was turned down."
I am most likely not alone in not knowing the significance of this. It made the front page, but I've never heard of either the author or the novel -- and I'd like to think I'm fairly up on this type of thing. Could someone who knows please enlighten us as to what the big deal is here?
but I'm far more excited about the fact he has a new book coming out right away than I am over the fact they're making a movie based on it.
Well, it has never been successfully tested.
I'm glad to hear that an author I've never heard of has secured film rights to a book that hasn't been released yet, but I think I liked this movie better when it was called 'The One' and starred Jet Li.
For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
Isn't it only something like 10% of stuff that gets optioned actually ever gets produced? Or possibly even less.
And given the difficulty Gaiman has had with Sandman and movie studios, I don't think this will ever see daylight.
I wonder if we could start a commodities market where movie studios sell tickets/DVDs/downloads for future movie productions. Maybe then "news" like this might be worth something.
Otherwise, wake me up when the movie has actually started *filming*.
Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
Everything being done these days was done better in the '70's!
Comment removed based on user account deletion
The Fantastic One
The premise of the novel is that it's better to have a permanent, eternal and unwinnable war between two opposing forces than it is to join one side, defeat the other side and have a subsequent eternity of peace?
Deleted
Yes, really! Although the bit about Interworld is somewhat interesting, this would have been a much better article if it explained the surrounding context: Neil Gaiman is hitting the silver screen in a BIG way right now. His graphic novel Stardust is coming this August, loaded with an astonishing number of name actors. And for the money shot, Gaiman's adaptation of Beowulf follows up in November, with another big batch of stars.
Anyone who enjoys Alice-in-Wonderland type stories, the book Neverwhere by Gaiman is probably one of my favorite books ever.
n /dp/0060557818/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/103-3732875-4118235 ?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1182206627&sr=8-2
Does an excellent job of telling a Wonderland type story where the protagonist is thrown into a totally different world, fairly close to this one. It is certainly my favorite work by Gaiman (much more so than American Gods, which seemed to be more 'critically acclaimed')
Amazon page: http://www.amazon.com/Neverwhere-Novel-Neil-Gaima
It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
From his website, "Neil Gaiman is the winner of 3 Hugos, 2 Nebulas, 1 World Fantasy Award, 4 Bram Stoker Awards, 6 Locus Awards, 2 British SF Awards, 1 British Fantasy Award, 3 Geffens, 1 International Horror Guild Award and 1 Mythopoeic."
Many of these are judged awards, not fan awards.
I can't agree with the implied criticism of "MirrorMask". I simply loved it, so did my wife.
Sure it lacked mass appeal; it was very much an "art-house" feel, and the cast of only 7 or so people ensured that the film felt more like a screenplay (not necessarily a bad thing in my opinion - check out "Dogville").
But the plot was inventive and quintessentially Gaiman, and the acting was top notch. Costumes and sets were simple but well thought out, and seeing Dave McKean's usual style of artwork transformed from the static page to cgi was absolutely jaw-dropping; it felt like 3D, somehow.
Weirder, both the wife and I had really powerful, lucid dreams that night. How many blockbusters can you say *that* about?
Original.
Conrad