Slashdot Mirror


Is Cash No Longer Legal Tender?

An anonymous reader asks: "I attend the University of Illinois at Chicago. Last semester my housing arrangements went smoothly. I put down my application fee, and my deposit just fine, got a room for the semester and life went on. This semester, because there was supposedly a large number of students who did not check into their rooms last semester, we were required to make a $100 prepayment, in addition to the application fee and deposit. No problem, I think, I see the university is trying to make a quick buck off people who don't follow through with their plans. Now I do NOT have a checking account, a credit card, or anything. I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash. However, they refused to take the cash. Is it legal for a state-owned university, let alone any business to not take legal tender?" The housing department also will not charge my university account (so I can pay the bursar or whoever I need to) in cash, and they want a check or money order. Nowhere in their letter did they say that. I fear out of technicality I am going to loose my housing since I cannot get them their money on time because they do not take cash.

What can I do?"

9 of 719 comments (clear)

  1. In some cases.... by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My understanding of the issue, although I do not specialize in this kind of law, is that your cash must be accepted for everything for which the good or service has already been provided; they are not required to accept it when you are making a payment for something you are to receive in the future.

    --
    "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    1. Re:In some cases.... by simm1701 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That probably what he told you, however if he only accepts payment in cash the most common reason is that he will only declare 1/2 - 3/4 of it as the actual income from rent and pocket the rest.

      Cash is nice and untraceable like that

      --
      $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
    2. Re:In some cases.... by zootm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then bring them the requested amount (+-3%) in pennies. "I can be an asshole too, sir."

      I don't know if that's legal in the US, but here (Scotland) one can refuse cash payment if the amount of change given is unreasonable. I think there might even be a legal definition of what "reasonable" is.

    3. Re:In some cases.... by oggiejnr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is UK law that there is a maximum that can be paid with each value of coin. See question 12 of http://www.royalmint.com/RoyalMint/web/site/Corpor ate/Home/Corp_faq.asp

  2. Re:Wow... by ximenes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The post office charges the following amounts for postal money orders:

    $0.01 to $500.00 - $1.05
    $500.01 to $1,000.00 - 1.50

    which I'm sure can fit into anyone's budget. Although I guess if a person doesn't trust banks then why entrust your money to the government or quasi-government agencies.

  3. Re:Wow... by sgant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For some reason, this guy doesn't trust banks and does everything in cash. What makes you think he's gonna trust the post office and all their new-fangled machines that do their witchery?

    I'm just saying...

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  4. Re:It's Your Choice by HappyEngineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's possible that the real reason he uses cash is because he doesn't like being tracked.

  5. Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm of the philosophy that the home ownership race is just another rat race right now. The majority of the reason why two-income families in America today have less savings than single-income families of 50 years ago is that home prices have more than doubled since then (adjusted for inflation).

    I'll have no part of that for a few reasons:
    1. I live in the city. All the even close to affordable houses are well outside what I consider a reasonable commuting range.
    2. It's just plain cheaper to rent. Sure, I'm not storing up equity, but really neither are a lot of people on subprime mortgages. At least the money I'm saving is being put into investments.
    3. I predict that once the baby boomers get a decade into retirement (with no kids in the house and failing health) a lot of them are going to start moving out of houses; many of them will be moving into "assisted living" centers. Houses in areas near good schools are going to get a LOT cheaper in the next ten years. At that time, I'll reevaluate whether owning a home is a good thing or not, but unless you can solidly plan to put down roots for the next 30 years where you are right now, owning a home might be an unwise investment.
    Leasing is silly if your end goal is to own.

    So? What makes owning such a great goal to have in the first place? If your privacy or your paranoia is so important to you that you'd go through life without a bank account, then going without owning the house you live in isn't so bad in comparison.

    Frankly, I'm paying about 1/2 to 2/3 what I'd pay for a mortgage on a home or condo in my area. My insurance is significantly cheaper, and I wouldn't have enough deductions to qualify for a tax break anyway.

    Consider this wise or unwise as you wish, but I was able to live for half a year without a paycheck to go volunteer in the local election last year, and I had no fear of losing a place to live. I know that I'm fortunate to be in a very high income bracket due to my choice of careers, but I could get by comfortably with a third of my income because I live below my means.

    Home ownership is overrated, if you ask me.
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by japhmi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Frankly, I'm paying about 1/2 to 2/3 what I'd pay for a mortgage on a home or condo in my area. My insurance is significantly cheaper, and I wouldn't have enough deductions to qualify for a tax break anyway.


      Rents go up, mortgages don't. My dad is currently paying 1/4 to 1/3 for his mortgage what it would cost to rent a house in his neighborhood, and 1/2 what a small apartment would be. That's because he's owned the house for years.

      Mortgages are horrible at first, because they take up a large chunk of your money. After a while, you get raises and your mortgage stays the same. Checking out my old apartment, it's already gone up $200 since I moved out, and another $200 (maybe 2-4 years down the road), it will be equal with my mortgage.

      Yes, there are cases where it may be better to rent than own, but there are probably more cases where it makes more sense to own.
      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke