Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Goes International

Bizzeh writes "YouTube has announced that they plan to go international. The video site, owned by Google, has launched nine country-specific versions across Brazil, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the UK. The BBC reports: 'YouTube is now stressing its credentials as a platform not just for user-generated content but also for professional broadcaster and advertisers. The company says it has more than 1,000 global partners, with more than 150 deals signed in Europe since March. [Chad Hurley, YouTube co-founder] said: "We respect copyright and we want to create new revenue streams to create opportunities. "We have been working with rights holders to help them leverage new audiences."'"

13 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. No German version? by MavEtJu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting that they left out a German version. After all, there way much more Germans than Dutchmen.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:No German version? by Eddi3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's also possible the Germans weren't interested.

    2. Re:No German version? by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Germans will take over the Polish and French versions.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:No German version? by MavEtJu · · Score: 2, Informative

      NL: 16.5 million people, 11 million internet eyeballs. Additional countries with the same language: Belgium, Suriname, Nederlandse Antillen.
      DE: 82 million people, 50 million internet eyeballs. Additional countries with the same language: Austria, Swiss.

      Your reasoning for including the Netherlands and excluding Germany is a very fragile one.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    4. Re:No German version? by Simon+Donkers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do note that Netherlands has a far higher broadband penetration. From the first result in Google Netherlands has 22.5 broadband connections per 100 inhabitants ranking #2, Germany ranks #18 with 10.2%. Belgium, partly Dutch ranks #8. Full stats.
      Also in the Netherlands online video is very popular, the public broadcast puts all self created shows on the internet, other providers also have online offerings. The VPRO already has a Youtube channel, so has the Public broadcasters in general and the institute for Beeld en Geluid.
      While population wise the Netherlands is small, with the high broadband we have many active internetusers. Microsoft Live mail for instance was launched in the Netherlands even before any other country because we have a high broadband penetration and a population eager to test new things.

    5. Re:No German version? by Nuskrad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but, Germany is a nation of industrious, hard working people. The Netherlands is a nation of stoners. Who's going to be watching more YouTube clips? :D

    6. Re:No German version? by Catil · · Score: 2, Informative

      The German newspaper "Ruhrnachrichten" reported today that Google is still in negotiations with the musicrights organisation GEMA (German RIAA eqivalent) about copyrighted music used in videoclips on Youtube without royalties getting paid.
      They quote an unnamed Google spokesman saying that a German Youtube site will hopefully follow in a few month.

      I really don't see how the GEMA could now demand their cut on behalf of a simple German translation of Youtube. It seems that the other already translated sites are still hosted in the USA and I guess de.youtube.com will be as well.

  2. Channels by interiot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well-known examples of producer-specific channels include BBC, NBA, and Al Jazeera.

    So major content providers are partnering with YouTube, but their YouTube videos are essentially DRM-free (they can still be downloaded like normal youtube videos can). So are content providers starting to care less about DRM now? Or since most of them are putting teaser promotional videos up, not full-length content, they don't worry so much if the short snippets are copied elsewhere?

  3. Video.Google by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can someone please explain to me why Google bought YouTube, merged the search results for the two sites, etc. but still hasn't ported over some of the nicer features of the video.google.com player?

    Doesn't it make sense to merge the best features of the two sites and the two players?

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  4. Oh wow... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is amazing. At last the international world can explore the wonderful technology that has brought together so many, using an effective comment and rating system to ensure that each video posted is as high quality as the last (the infallible "5 star system").

    No but seriously, YouTube is like a cesspool. There is no quality control for comments. There are no moderators who bann idiots who do stuff like chain letters and spamvertising their own videos. People are now using videos of themselves talking for what the comment box was supposed to originally be. And this is not just the fault of the stupid users on youtube. The limited size of the comment box and the ease of posting comments is all their issues.

    Lets not ignore the fact that people are trying to make this like a second my-space. I'm tired of getting e-mails from people who just want to say "hi" to me over and over again for no god-damned reason. Its nice and all, but its not a "comment" or appropriate "message". Your not telling me what I can do to make better videos. Your not critiquing my videos or even asking me what the source of my video files are (to which I usually reply "it costs money" and never hear from you again).

    Furthermore, the lack of quality control of videos (I'll just say it: reposts) and lack of meta-tag control is absurd. I see people copying-and-pasting lists of every anime ever created (or at least most of them) followed by every number from 1 to 400 to ensure there SLIDE SHOW OF GOOGLED IMAGES can be found. 90% of the "anime music videos" on the bloody site are either slideshows that don't even match the beat of the music or use a single image size for consistency, or else videos copied and pasted from AMV.org.

    Lets not forget the flagging system. With this wonderful system, even the most innocent of videos can be tagged as inappropriate, nevermind that it was tagged simply because its a "rival video" of another creator...

    This isn't even looking at the fact every video uploaded on youtube ends up having lower quality then an AVI washed through windows-movie maker with the default render settings.

    I'll stick to Crunchy Roll and Stage6 for now, thank you very much.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  5. Censorship by another name by jonnyj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article: "It's not just about translating, it also about creating content unique to certain countries."

    This is marketing double-speak for 'we want to restrict certain users from accessing certain content.' It'll start with pressure from commercial organisations (MPAA, TV networks, etc) and gradually move towards yielding to government pressure - as we've already seen with Google's search engine censorship antics. Anyone in China want to see footage of Tiananmen square? Forget it. It's not in Google's best commercial interests.

    In future you will see only what Google wants you to see. With its increasing dominance of both access to web content and content itself, Google is becoming the new global censor, answerable to no-one but its shareholders. This is very, very scary

  6. Awwww. by nixkuroi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this mean that the Japanese are going to start paying attention to all the copyrighted anime, game shows, talk shows and dramas people have put on there?

    Damn internationalization is going to ruin my interweb. :P

  7. Did you know... by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    YouTube accounts for 10% of Internet traffic. Imagine that. That's more than milions of other site do, combined.

    And they built that entirely on venture capital (until they got bought by google).

    I read all the time about competing video sites bragging about their high def videos - could they possibly sustain the video playback count of YouTube with such high bandwidth videos? I really doubt that. And no wonder YouTube stays low quality as well.