Pros/Cons of Working at Big R&D Consulting Firm?
pagalvin asks: "I'm being recruited for an 'R&D Architect' position at a Big 4 consulting firm in the U.S.
Does the community care to share its experience working as 'overhead' in a large organization that is most famous for its consultants working 60 hour weeks and billing 'til the fat lady sings? In such places, do non-billable R&D types get any respect? Is there a a long-term career path that sticks with the technology track?"
Yes, no, and yes.
Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
My father was R&D at Texas Instruments back when I was a kid and TI was hot and all that. He brought me into his lab once and they had liquid nitrogen and helium and oxygen faucets! How cool is that?!
From my experience, the ones who aren't billable are the ones who get cut first.
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
I have a personal aversion to the bullshit at consulting firms. The pressure to generate revenue the brutal social Darwinism, the massive hours just to show your face and the fact that after all that it's bootlickers and sociopaths who get ahead. The only thing worse than a consulting firm is one of those Market Research firms like Gartner or Yankee group. They used to give people personal valets because they didn't want them to EVER leave work. Not ever. May they all sexually service mythological beasts in hell, all of them.