Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

EU Broadens Probe of Search Engines and Privacy

Posted by kdawson on from the 30-year-cookies-need-preservatives dept.

Raver32 sends in word of a PC World article reporting that EU officials are looking beyond Google in their examination of the impact search engines have on privacy. Quoting: "A panel of European data protection officials called the Article 29 Working Group decided Wednesday to request information from Google's rivals amid concerns that search engines are holding onto information about the people who use them for too long, Hustinx said. Hustinx... declined to name the companies. However, they are believed to include Yahoo Inc., Lycos Inc. and Microsoft Corp.'s Windows Live.com."

5 of 35 comments (clear)

  1. Pot / Kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering the data retention being required of ISPs by countries like the UK how can they complain about Google etc. ?

    1. Re:Pot / Kettle by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I don't agree with the EU's data retention directive, there is a clear difference between the regulated retention of logs by ISP's and the unregulated retention of log by search engines.
      The logs of ISP's can only be released under court order, and the period of retention is regulated.
      The logs of the search engines however can be accessed by the companies owning the search engine as well as anyone the company decides to sell them to, and they can retain the logs for as long as they want, all without any kind of oversight.

    2. Re:Pot / Kettle by Ravnen · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I suppose the primary reason I disagree with this is that I haven't the time, expertise or resources to determine what all the people and firms I interact with are doing with any information I give to them, and I'd argue neither have most people. To me, privacy is no different to any other fundamental right: if I buy a plot of land, for example, I don't expect to have to enforce my own property rights, it's something I expect the state to do. It's the same with protecting my rights to free speech, privacy, et al.

      I can certainly see the problem with the state placing onerous burdens on the private sector, and care should be taken to ensure this doesn't happen, particularly where there's scope for abuse. If, for example, privacy concerns over Google were exposed as an attempt by its competitors to abuse the legal system because they're unable to compete on merit, I'd object to that. However, a lot of people have real concerns over their privacy rights being violated by firms like Google, and as far as I can tell, that's the basis of the EU's actions here. Moreover, the requirements being placed on these firms seem quite reasonable to me.

  2. Hardly surprising by tqft · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Hardly surprising - see here

    http://technology.guardian.co.uk/opinion/story/0,, 2107262,00.html

    "But arguing over whether discussion should focus on the worst offender, versus a general industry indictment, can be a distraction from the need to implement privacy protections which cannot be easily ignored."

    http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001218. html

    http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/mt-comments.cgi? entry_id=1218

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  3. Re:EU protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >The EU started out as a common market, to make trade easier between European countries. Now it's turned into an anti-America machine. Now everybody loses.

    No, you're wrong, and your post is typical of many USians. You're used, as a country, to trampling all before you - but the EU is too big to push around. The EU is not anti-US but it does have its own point of view on many topics that may diverge from the States. You are confusing the normal free will of the EU with being specifically anti-US.