Slashdot Mirror


Is the CD Becoming Obsolete?

mrnomas writes "What's to blame for the declining CD sales? Is it that manufacturers are putting out more and more 'safe' (read: crap) music while independent musicians are releasing online? Is it because iTunes is now the third largest music retailer in the country? Or is it just that CDs are becoming obsolete?" Quoting: "Forbes.com [ran] an article showing that CD sales are expected to be down 20% in 2008 (slightly higher than the 15% drop initially predicted). Why such a drop? What's truly happening is a gradual shift away from physical media to downloadable formats. What this indicates, so far, is that US sales of digital music will be growing at an estimated rate of 28% in 2008, however physical sales will drop even further, resulting in a net overall decline.""

7 of 645 comments (clear)

  1. Speaking for myself by Whuffo · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My CD purchasing is zero these days - until the music industry quits harassing their customers and treating the performers as slaves they're not getting a dime from me.

    Maybe others feel the same way?

  2. I still buy CDs, and here is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. It's a high-quality, DRM-free copy of the music which I can convert into FLAC and other digital formats I choose. (Yes, there are exceptions, but it's much better than most online stores).

    2. I have a semi-permanent copy which I can re-rip as many times as I want.

    3. Shiny.

  3. I hope not... by spoco2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At least, I hope a physical medium for purchasing and keeping your music is not on the way out.

    I hate downloaded music, I hate having nothing but some files and a printed out cover to show for my money (or no cover etc. if I'm not going to back them up individually).

    I love having shelves of cds, with their cover art, their liner notes etc. I love the hard, physical format of them.

    I'm forever worried that I'll lose or misplace, erase or whatever the tracks I've legally downloaded...

    I want physical music delivery to remain dammit!

  4. Re:Not yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Higher Bit Rate music sounds better on even poor quality sound systems. The problem is, is that most people who say they don't care just haven't heard their music in +384kbps and don't know what they're missing.

    The music industry should realize the CD is a fading format. They need to start pushing 192khz audio dvds. They have almost the same manufacturing cost as CDs. And considering the number of homes that have surround sound system in the US, this is quality that could easily be appreciated.

    (under 25 and appreciates good sound quality)

  5. Re:Not Just Away From CDs by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wouldn't say that the music has changed at all. Some musicians work best in the medium of the album (Pink Floyd, The Beatles, etc..), whereas some musicians work best in the context of individual songs (one-hit-wonders, and 90% of the "top 40" artists).

    I would say that (for the past few years at least), good solid albums have stuck out more in my mind than individual singles have. This is especially true among independent artists.

    A few somewhat recent albums that I've enjoyed as a whole (in no particular order)
    • The Crane Wife by The Decemberists
    • Boxer by The National
    • Plans by Death Cab For Cutie
    • Hissing Fauna, Are You The Destroyer by Of Montreal
    • The Magic Position by Patrick Wolf
    • Funeral by The Arcade Fire
    • Cassadaga by Bright Eyes
    • "Cross" by Justice
    • A Weekend in the City by Bloc Party
    • Illinois by Sufjan Stevens
    • Armchair Apocrypha by Andrew Bird
    • Like the Linen by Thao Nugyen
    • In The Aeroplane Over The Sea by Neutral Milk Hotel (10 years old, but arguably one of the most influential albums of those 10 years)


    and the list goes on.... There have been quite a few high-profile "popular" albums released by popular artists such as Green Day, My Chemical Romance, Justin Timberlake, and The Red Hot Chili Peppers, all of which are very much intended to be played as an entire album.

    At a show I recently went to, I bought the band's CD on a whim because I enjoyed the show. As the guy handed it to me (he was the band's bassist), he encouraged me to copy it, share it, email it, or "do whatever you want to get the word out." The side you don't hear is that most small artists owe much their very existence to the internet.

    So, no. The album is far from dead. Even though popular music has almost completely gone to shit in the US, the independent music scene is arguably the best it's ever been.
    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  6. Re:Not yet by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all you're starting with a weak argument: "what does Bob Dylan know about what music sounds like" is not the sort of position I would prefer to defend. Someone called Chefelf wrote an interesting blog entry called Bob Dylan can go to hell. With a title like that, you know it's not going to be a "Dylan is God, Maaaaaaan" fest, but in case you think I (or he/she/it) is trolling, here is the part that applies to what we were discussing. It sums up Dylan's hypocritical attitude towards digital music. (Read the article to see it properly in context).

    [Dylan says that] CDs apparently have no stature, but the iPod does, particularly when Apple is giving him a sizeable check to perform a yawn-inducing "blues" track from his shitty new album which he is also able to shamelessly plug at the same tune. Or

    Bob Dylan: "CDs are small. There's no stature to it."
    Translation: It is the size of CDs that affect sound. Records are bigger. Bigger is better. That's just common sense. The replies are certainly worth reading too; it's not an all-out attack on Dylan- he has his defenders, but having read them all, I'm not convinced that Dylan's attitudes are worthy of attention any more than any other angry old man's.

    And the guy was *never* technically brilliant. Quite the opposite. It's somewhat strange to be lectured on issues like sound quality by a guy whose sound was.... rough. I don't deny the guy's influence, and he's undeniably recorded some important stuff, but that doesn't make him God, or even stop him being a Grumpy Old Man.
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  7. People don't care about sound quality by tentimestwenty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People don't care about sound quality. Now that they've seen that they can put their whole music collection on a little box the size of a deck of cards, the only thing 99% of people care about is size. Take it from someone who owns a high end stereo store. The number one request I get is for "wireless speakers." This is followed closely by "a tiny amplifier." People just want invisible music. They're not listening seriously, it's all for background. And now that they can download anything they want, why the hell would they buy space-taking CDs? The CD is dead. Ironically, the only people who do care about quality have gone back to vinyl, largely because the CD selection locally is dwindling to the same size.