Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Security Makes "Worst Jobs" List

Stony Stevenson asks, rhetorically, "What do whale-feces researchers, hazmat divers, and employees of Microsoft's Security Response Center have in common? They all made Popular Science magazine's 2007 list of the absolute worst jobs in science." Quoting: "The MSRC ranked near the middle as the sixth-worst job in this year's list.. 'We did rate the Microsoft security researcher as less-bad than the people who prepare the carcasses for dissection in biology laboratories,' Moyer said. Moyer didn't have to think long when asked whether he'd rather have the number 10-ranked whale research job. 'Whale feces or working at Microsoft? I would probably be the whale feces researcher,' he said. 'Salt air and whale flatulence; what could go wrong?'" Here's the Popular Mechanics list all on one page.

22 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Odd... by ForumTroll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft actually has security researchers? What do they actually do?

    --
    "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:Odd... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
      What do they actually do?

      Dissect a bloated carcass.

      No, sorry. That was the whale guys, wasn't it?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Odd... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the contrary, I'd expect it to be one of the best jobs ever; you don't have to do anything.

    3. Re:Odd... by revengebomber · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the health plan is terrible. It doesn't even cover flying chairs.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  2. I call whaleshit by jomama717 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Support sucks no matter what you're working with - I've been there - this is a Microsoft slam piece from an unlikely source.

    For giggles, here's the list:
    • Number 10: Whale-Feces Researcher
    • Number 9: Forensic Entomologist
    • Number 8: Olympic Drug Tester?
    • Number 7: Gravity Research Subject
    • Number 6: Microsoft Security Grunt
    • Number 5: Coursework Carcass Preparer
    • Number 4: Garbologist
    • Number 3: Elephant Vasectomist
    • Number 2: Oceanographer
    • Number 1: Hazmat Diver
    --
    while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
    1. Re:I call whaleshit by BlueTrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Technology/Story?id=32909 63&page=4

      2. Oceanographer: Oceanographers' jobs are "getting harder and harder every year," said Ward. Faced with the predictions that by 2048 seafood will no longer exist, coral reefs will vanish in the next decade and that an ever expanding mass of garbage the size of Texas in the North Pacific has caused irreparable damage to the world's water supply, these scientists are charged not only with protecting the health of the ocean, but also with turning the prognosis around.

      "Oceanographers are really tasked with just analyzing sad facts on deoxygenating oceans, increased pollution, whole masses of garbage swirling in the middle of the ocean. What it really is, is a testament to how devoted and loyal a bunch of people they are.

      "They're working extremely hard on a very difficult problem, but they also are very optimistic people. They believe that we can turn it around and the ocean is a very dynamic living environment and they feel that with the proper care, we can turn it around, but so far that has not been the case," said Ward.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    2. Re:I call whaleshit by DrMrLordX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oceanographers are dedicated to the study and, ideally, salvation of numerous aquatic ecosystems that are in a rapid state of collapse. It's one thing to deal with "bad news" on a regular basis. It's quite another to watch the sea dying right before your eyes. Most of us have become comfortable with our oceans' plight by ignoring it; that is a comfort not easily afforded to oceanographers.

    3. Re:I call whaleshit by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny
      How about Proctologist or as they are currently known (in the PC world) colorectal surgeons.


      They're the ones who work for the TSA who allow you to get on a plane, right?.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  3. Time to rethink OS's by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When staff is short I am sometimes stuck with help-desk duties of late. I am appauled by the lack of transparency when trying to troubleshoot Windows. There is no easy way to "X-ray the pipes" to see what is going in and out and where it is getting stuck. Thus, one ends up having to play Sherlock Holmes to figure out the crime based on random clues scattered here and there. One cannot open the blackbox, but rather has to tweak the front knobs, trying a Cartesion Join of all possible combos, or at least a random sample as an approximation.

    It does not have to be this way. The OS should be broken up into fairly independent services and the protocol of each service known, shown, and loggable. One could thus isolate oddities. If a peice of software I build constantly has problems (or confusion) with certain processes or steps, I make trace modes and special reports that can echo and document the process as it is taking place. OS's don't seem to be built this way, you have to randomly tweak stuff until the problem (hopefully) goes away. It is like banging the Mellenium Falcon when it stalls. In the digital age I am stuck with analog-like troubleshooting techniques.

    1. Re:Time to rethink OS's by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The OS should be broken up into fairly independent services and the protocol of each service known, shown, and loggable.

      Trouble is, that model's incompatible with Microsoft's business, and it's customers' requirements for DRM.

      They need the OS to be black boxed and inscrutable to prevent people hacking things like WGA and product activation. They also need obfuscated protocols and formats to stop people like WINE from reverse engineering their APIs.

      The clearer and easier to understand MS makes it's system, the worse it is for their business model. That's why there's no way they'll do as you suggest, despite being ordered to by the DOJ and the EU.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:Time to rethink OS's by mastershake_phd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Every now and then my harddrive will start whirring away, when it shouldn't be, and as far as I can tell there is no easy way to tell which process is the culprit in XP. Hell, you ever get one of those "this file is being used by another program" messages and have no idea what program is responsible? I've had to boot into safe mode just to delete a file. And it was an .avi not a system file or anything.

    3. Re:Time to rethink OS's by jimicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So your solution to any random problem is "run it under a debugger"?

      Would it really be so hard for the software writers to, oh, I don't know, USE THE LOGGING FACILITIES THAT ARE BUILT INTO THE OPERATING SYSTEM??. Windows has a perfectly good Event Viewer and APIs for writing to it, so how come hardly any software ever logs what it's doing?

    4. Re:Time to rethink OS's by davebert · · Score: 5, Informative
      Get SysInternal's Process Explorer. It's got a Find action that will tell you which process has a file open.

      It also has an option to replace TaskManager, which is very handy...

    5. Re:Time to rethink OS's by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative

      man fuser
      man lsof

      hth

      --
      Deleted
    6. Re:Time to rethink OS's by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because fucking around with the command line is so much easier and more intuitive than having the error message read "This disk cannot be unmounted because a file on it is in use by the program named ______________ ".

  4. Forensic Entomologist I can relate to, sorta by iHasaFlavour · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many years ago in my former career I had to treat a guy who had been in a ditch comotose for so long he had maggots well established in every available cavity. Took a while that did.

    Not, it has to be said, my fondest memory of that time. It ranks right up there with the odd fact that all tramps poo contains giant lentils.

    --
    Reality is that which, when we cease to believe in it, still exists. - Philip K Dick
    1. Re:Forensic Entomologist I can relate to, sorta by misanthrope101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work in a hospital, and ER docs like to swap stories. The worst I've heard is of a woman who was kidnapped, beaten, repeatedly raped, and thrown into a ditch to die. She didn't die, but she did land on a fire ant mound, where she stayed until someone found her, which was not enough time for her to die. Tragedy happens, crime happens, but sometimes you just have to think "that's not fair." I always think of that story when I hear someone say "well, everything happens for a reason."

    2. Re:Forensic Entomologist I can relate to, sorta by misanthrope101 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      About 70% of the people who are released from death row after being exonerated by DNA evidence were convicted on eyewitness testimony. The death penalty is bad because witnesses lie or are mistaken, cops lie or are mistaken, cops torture/beat confessions out of people, jailhouse snitches are allowed to testify to reduce their own sentence, evidence is planted (or hidden, if exculpatory), and so on.

      We think we have a god's-eye view and we just know that someone is guilty, but the case is stacked to look that way, and we don't really know, not definitively. Very seldom is there videotape of a crime like this--usually we have to rely on people whose careers are built on getting an arrest and a conviction. People will send you to death row just to help their own careers, even if they have to intimidate witnesses, supress contradictory testimony, or reduce someone else's sentence for their "testimony" about the night you confessed to them.

  5. Re:Uh.... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
    So why on earth would anyone be sterilizing an endangered species?

    I just wanted them to get some practice before they did mine.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  6. close... by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dissect a bloated carcass.
    No, sorry. That was the whale guys, wasn't it?

    No, that was the biology lab preparers.
    The Microsoft guys deal with shit, and are in over their heads.

    Oh, wait. THAT was the whale guys!
  7. Misnomer by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know science. I do science. Microsoft security response is not science. It's the intelligent design contingent of the IT world. It can call itself science all it wants but it can't act like science. Sooner or later they'll tell you that you just have to believe them, while they're busily cooking up the next, more complicated batch of the same old same old and collecting more people with impressive credentials to preach it at you.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  8. Mike Rowe by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Mike Rowe of "Dirty Jobs" on the Discovery Channel can spend a day working at MS. It might top the time he had to wade through 3 feet of bat shit. I understand Ballmer goes bat shit all the time over there at MS. Of course, they might not let a fellow named Mike Rowe into their facilities after someone pulled this cute little trick.