Slashdot Mirror


Google Desktop Now on Linux

mytrip writes "Google was set to launch late on Wednesday a beta version of Google Desktop search for Linux in a sign of encouragement by the search giant for Linux on the desktop. Google Desktop allows people to search the Web while also searching the full text of all the information on their computer, including Gmail and their Web search history. Because the index is stored locally on the computer, users can access Gmail and Web history while offline."

7 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Privacy by PaisteUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anybody have concern for Google knowing what's on their local disks?

    --
    root@allevil:~#
    1. Re:Privacy by st0nes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Will they know? It says the index is stored locally, does that mean it never goes to Google?

      --
      Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
    2. Re:Privacy by nickallen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a good point but then shouldn't you extend that thought to all proprietary software? Without the source code any software could be doing a search of your files without you knowing. It seems strange to say you will boycott google search but not other proprietary products just because google's product is software that performs searches. It really depends on how much you trust the vendor when it comes to proprietary software.

    3. Re:Privacy by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it's more like security by diversity. If a burglar had to try dozens of entirely different types of keys (never mind all the key patterns that each type includes) to break into a house, he would not find breaking into houses as attractive a prospect, and if he did try, it would be more likely that someone would notice him. Similarly, if a hacker has to try dozens of different buffer overflow attacks against your system, he's less likely to target it, and if he does, you're more likely to notice it, since naturally a buffer overflow attack will degrade into a crashed program if it doesn't actually execute the intended payload.

      Besides, there's nothing wrong with security by obscurity, as long as it's only one tool. For example, moving your ssh port to 2222 instead of 22 will probably subject you to an order of magnitude or two fewer ssh worms, which is a good thing. But of course you'd still want to have good passwords. Obscurity is a useful tool, especially when you are protecting a system that has no intrinsic reason to be selected. It can make you less of a target, and since security is never perfect, any layer that reduces the probability of an attack is useful.

  2. Re:Spousal Abuse by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is a publicly held company, not a soup kitchen.

  3. No 64 bit by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish they would start making 64 bit versions of their stuff so we could quit trying to force install their products.

  4. Obsession with search by Orlando · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I the only one baffled by this obsession with local search? I send most of 5 days a week using desktop computers and a lot of the weekends, and I have to say that I very rarely need to search for anything locally. I put stuff where I can find it later using simple directory structures. Is that so difficult?

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-