Slashdot Mirror


AMD Finally Launches Low-Price DX10 Cards

Steve Kerrison writes "The Radeon 'R600' HD 2900 XT was late coming, and so by extension are the lower cost parts derived from it. The Radeon HD 2400 and 2600s are now available, just the same, with pricing aimed at knocking mid-range GeForce 8 series cards off people's shopping lists. There's more to a graphics card than price; performance and driver functionality are key too. HEXUS had some fun and games testing the new Radeons: 'The hardware designers may now be sitting back, content that their DX10-supporting midrange SKUs are at least as compelling as the competition's. But, and it's a big, big but, the current drivers aren't realizing the kind of performance we'd expect from a knowledge of the Radeon HD 2600 XT's setup.'" A very useful article ... unfortunately spread across a dozen pages with no 'print view' available.

9 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Jump right to the end... by chris098 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Usually when I read these reviews, the first page that I read is the conclusions. I typically don't have the attention span to read through the whole thing, so this lets me get the drift of the article without sucking up too much time.

    The link to the conclusion page: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=9187&pa ge=12

    I found it humorous that the first line on that page is "Congratulations on getting this far, folks.".

  2. AMD VS. ATI by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a little confused when I first read the headline, and the I saw the word Radeon and I remembered that AMD bought ATI. However, aren't they still using the ATI name when selling these cards? Wouldn't it be a little less confusing to say "ATI Finally Launches Low-Price DX10 Cards"? Anyway, if they have dropped the ATI name, I think it's a bad move. ATI had a pretty good reputation. Changing to a different name seems like a bold move.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:AMD VS. ATI by Bob-taro · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think ATI/AMD should combine the two names and market the graphics cards under the name, "DAAMIT"

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  3. Where is ATI? by cerelib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is AMD planning on absorbing ATI or keeping it as a separate brand? People keep using "AMD" in place of "ATI". The products are called "ATI Radeon HD 2xxx". The ATI website is now green and AMD branded, but the ATI name is still used on the products. Has there been any word from AMD about the future of the ATI brand? Are they just in transition to absorbing ATI completely?

  4. Guess I won't be buying one... by uarch · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... not after that review:

    Whatever the game requirements, it's clear that Radeon HD 2600 XT performance is, frankly, horrible. It's comfortably bested by a Radeon X1650 XT and wilfully thrashed by a Radeon X1950 Pro - a card that comes in at the same price.
  5. Re:So how bout that open source? by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hell, even Intel's crappy integrated graphics work better in xorg than ATI.

    For very strange values of 'crappy'. Intel chips have opensource drivers, unlike those of ATI or NVidia, and most of them are already incorporated into official releases of Linux and Xorg. Intel's graphics chips may not be powerful enough for heavy gaming, but that should not be an issue for Linux users anyway. The Core 2 fiasco is a shame though.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  6. SKU You! by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, we are going to keep using SKU? This is an acronym worthy of being added to the everyday lexicon? It's not even a techie acronym, it's for marketing and accounting!

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  7. OSS drivers ? by BESTouff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OSS drivers for Xorg ? No ? Not interested.

  8. Re:So how bout that open source? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Intel's graphics chips may not be powerful enough for heavy gaming, but that should not be an issue for Linux users anyway.

    Right. Because I have a completely separate computer that I use to boot windows games. Oh wait...

    I see your point, but this is slashdot... not "Microsoft office user formum and portal system framework v3.0" (At least that's what I'd imagine they'd call it.)

    Point is we are largely technology enthusiasts... and there is nothing in intel integrated graphics to be enthusiastic about. Their drivers yes... but the chips themselves... hell no.