Slashdot Mirror
Far Future Will See No Evidence of Universe's Origin
Dr. Eggman writes "According to an article on Ars Technica and its accompanying General Relativity and Gravitation journal article 'The Return of a Static Universe and the End of Cosmology', in the far future of the universe all evidence of the origin of the universe will be gone. Intelligences alive 100-billion-years from now will observe a universe that appears much the way our early 1900s view of the universe was: Static, had always been there, and consisted of little more than our own galaxy and a islands of matter. 'The cosmic microwave background, which has provided our most detailed understanding of the Big Bang, will also be gone. Its wavelength will have been shifted to a full meter, and its intensity will drop by 12 orders of magnitude. Even before then, however, the frequency will reach that of the interstellar plasma and be buried in the noise--the stuff of the universe itself will mask the evidence of its origin. Other evidence for the Big Bang comes from the amount of deuterium and helium isotopes in the universe.'"
Maybe God already wrote "Yeah I did it" in Hebrew using subtle differences in the Microwave Background Radiation that was clearly detectable from about 300,000 years after the big bang until roughly around the time he had enough trans-helium elements to start toying around making planets.
Dying once isn't such a big of deal. It's that second death you need to watch out for.
God spoke to me.
God made the universe! )
Price Technology Chad Price
No one really agrees on what "black holes" are, we don't know why the universe seems to be expanding faster and faster, and we generally have two physical models that don't agree with each other (relativity and the different quantum physics theories and their details).
But never the less, these "scientists" write as if they knew there was a big bang. The only big bang I see is when the calculation go bang because the physic theories are only approximations of the real thing. That doesn't say a thing except that something in the theories are wrong, and we already know that. Writing about that God creating everything in seven days on in a big back doesn't help at all.
I'll believe these big bang stories as much as I would believe someone showing an enormous amount of data about the population growth and tell me that there was only 2 people at a time and before that nothing. When these things happen in your calculations, it's a sign that your theory isn't complete.