Improved High-Performance Energy Storage
Physicists at the University of North Carolina have developed new improvements for high-energy-density capacitors that can store up to seven times as much energy per unity volume as common capacitors. "The amount of energy that a capacitor can store depends on the insulating material in between the metal surfaces, called a dielectric. A polymer called PVDF has interested physicists as a possible high-performance dielectric. It exists in two forms, polarized or unpolarized. In either case, its structure is mostly frozen-in and changes only slightly when a capacitor is charged up. Mixing a second polymer called CTFE with PVDF results in a material with regions that can change their structure, enabling it to store and release unprecedented amounts of energy."
Is this really newsworthy?
http://www.google.com/search?q=ultracapacitors
No sig today...
In his novel Friday Robert Heinlein described a fictional device called a "Shipstone". This was an ultra-super electricity storage device.
Supposedly, the shipstone had a dramatic positive effect on the world. It was no longer a problem to get electricity from where it's made to where you need it. Big solar power systems were put in areas that get lots of sun, for example. Cars would run on Shipstones, and instead of gas stations, they had stations where you could swap the discharged Shipstone from your car for a fresh, fully-charged one.
I have been wondering if these new ultracapacitors might someday become practical "Shipstones". How close are ultracapacitors to, say, powering a car?
Can you drain the power slowly from an ultracapactor, to run a car for a few hours, or do you have to drain it quickly? Does charge leak out slowly over time from an ultracapacitor, or can you make it fairly inert?
It's great that they have "seven times the energy per unity [sic] volume", but what is the energy density improvment per unit mass??? Seems like that would be a lot more important for mobile applications.
Capacitors are rarely meant to be a battery replacement. They are meant to be used for fast storage and release of energy on the order of milli- or microseconds. The chemical reaction that occurs in batteries is far too slow to produce a resonating RLC circuit, or even power a bright camera flash where a capacitor is used in parallel with the battery. Likewise, the Capacitor has a much smaller operating output than a battery in general and they tend to leak thus requiring a load just to keep them at full charge.
The excitement isn't in the fact that they may be a battery replacement, it's that they can store a ton of energy for many other electrical uses.
Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
While I do agree that this research is still preliminary, the technology has the huge potential to finally overcome two major hassles in terms of electric power storage, namely charge times (after all, capacitors charge way quicker than any NiMH or Li-On battery pack) and density of storage.
:-)
This could open the way for two things:
1) A decent means to storage power generated by solar panels and wind turbines so it can be used when the Sun is not up and wind velocity is low. That could make it possible for true distributed power generation, where every home generates its own electricity and shares the excess with other people in the neighborhood.
2) A true, practical electric car. With supercapacitor batteries, we could dramatically increase the range of the electric car, reduce the size of the battery pack so it rarely inteferes with interior space, and charge the battery pack in about the same time you fill up a 20-gallon fuel tank!
That's why I think people are still underestimating MIT's announcement of nanotube-based supercapacitor development. It could potentially make the whole idea of fuel cell power superfluous.
As an EE student in Virginia, I'm very interested in the subject of this article: unfortunately, it doesn't really say much more than the post above....
www.purevolume.com/martyd
Energy and power density are usually given by mass (Joules/kg or Watts/kg).
The one major thing to worry about though is that an item that can charge up incredibly fast, contain a lot of electricity, and store it efficiently, can also discharge rapidly and violently...
Ultracapacitors are really impressive. They exceed the limits of what was considered physically possible twenty years ago. The newer ones can be charged fast and discharged fast; it's not like the older ones that could only deliver tiny currents. People have used ultracapacitors to start auto engines.
The problem, though, is that all the energy can come out at once if they're shorted or damaged. Lithium-ion battery thermal runaway is a problem, and laptop fires have resulted. Ultracapacitor failures will be worse. You don't really want to have a fuel tank's worth of energy stored in a capacitor. But saving the energy from braking a car is probably OK.